Preface

AuthorRobert W. Tarun
Pages23-26
PREFACE
Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in the past five years
has increased dramatically. The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are conducting over 140 investiga-
tions of U.S. and foreign companies,1 their joint ventures, employees, and third-
party contractors for alleged improper payments around the world. There is no
reason to believe this trend will subside in the United States or elsewhere. Indeed,
there is now clear momentum and a clear incentive among foreign governments to
investigate bribery and related conduct under various international conventions.
The era of mysterious “one man” consultancies, extravagant behind-the-curtain
gifts to foreign officials, minimal due diligence of foreign agents, and willful blind-
ness to the conduct of joint venture partners is coming to a close. Corporate direc-
tors and officers can no longer ignore or rationalize unusually large foreign sales
budgets, lucrative consultancies, or extravagant entertainment with shadowy or
unknown figures with the words, “This is the way it is done in that part of the
world.” While there remain some lax foreign states that knowingly permit their citi-
zens to engage in corrupt practices in distant countries, they are a minority, their
world is shrinking, and they will likely have to reform if they wish to remain mem-
bers of an increasingly transparent international business community. Transpar-
ency is becoming the governing watchword in multinational mergers, acquisitions,
joint ventures, and corporate transactions and it is all the more critical in challeng-
ing economic times.
Increased FCPA enforcement means increased responsibilities for boards of
directors, general counsel, and transactional lawyers—and new and uncharted
waters for white-collar criminal prosecutors and defense lawyers. “Preventative
law” in the form of proactive counseling and director, officer, and employee train-
ing is the smart way for corporations to manage risk in an area where missteps
can be very costly. Quality anti-bribery and recordkeeping training along with
comprehensive, recorded due diligence on the front end of mergers, acquisitions,
joint ventures, and third-party contracts and follow-on due diligence can minimize
criminal liability and avoid lengthy investigations, serious fines, substantial legal
fees, and damage to corporate and executive reputations. There is no substitute for
live anti-bribery training of senior officers and employees responsible for foreign
sales, finances, and accounting. As important, thorough pre-acquisition due dili-
gence may be the most compelling defense and route to avoid expensive successor
criminal liability.
xxiii

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT