-
Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal
- Publisher:
- Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal
- Publication date:
- 2011-08-09
- ISBN:
- 1548-2596
- Copyright:
- COPYRIGHT TV Trade Media, Inc.<br/>COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Issue Number
- Nbr. 20, January 2019
- Nbr. 19, January 2017
- Nbr. 18, January - January 2016
- Nbr. 17, January - January 2014
- Nbr. 16, January 2013
- Nbr. 15, January - January 2012
- Nbr. 14, January 2011
- Nbr. 13, January 2010
- Nbr. 12, January 2009
- Nbr. 11, January 2008
- Nbr. 10, January 2007
- Nbr. 9, January 2006
- Nbr. 8, January 2005
- Nbr. 7, January 2004
- Nbr. 6, January 2003
- Nbr. 5, January 2002
Latest documents
- An Oppressor Engaging Herself.
- Lessons from Venezuela on Countering Oppression.
- The Lawyer's Baggage: Engaging the Oppressor Within.
- When a Smile Gets You Inside: Engaging the Oppressor in Service of Resistance.
- Principles, Tactics, and Negotiations with the Oppressor.
- The Choice of an Oppressor.
- The Dangers of Liberalism: A Short Reflection on the African National Congress in South Africa.
- A More Possible Meeting: Initial Reflections on Engaging (As) the Oppressor.
- Engaging the Oppressor Within.
- Engaging the Oppressor.
Featured documents
- The Efficacy of National Human Rights Institutions Seen in Context: Lessons from the Myanmar National Human Rights Commission.
- Engaging the Oppressor.
- Restricting the freedom of contract: a fundamental prohibition.
- An Oppressor Engaging Herself.
- A punitive bind: policing, poverty, and neoliberalism in New York City.
- Speeding up sexual assault trials: a constructive critique of India's fast-track courts.
- Are we violating the human rights of the world's poor? Responses to four critics.
- Going from bad to good: combating corporate corruption on World Bank-funded infrastructure projects.
- The Risk of Statelessness: Reasserting a Rule for the Protection of the Right to Nationality.
- Denial of justice: the latest indigenous land disputes before the European Court of Human Rights and the need for an expansive interpretation of Protocol 1.