The management of an ageing workforce: organisational policies in Germany and Britain

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12043
Date01 November 2014
Published date01 November 2014
The management of an ageing workforce:
organisational policies in Germany and Britain
Heike Schröder, Institute for Human Resource Management, Vienna University of
Economics and Business
Michael Muller-Camen, Institute for Human Resource Management, Vienna
University of Economics and Business and Department of Human Resource
Management, Middlesex University Business School
Matthew Flynn, Centre for Research into the Older Workforce, Newcastle
University
Human Resource Management Journal, Vol 24, no 4, 2014, pages 394–409
Demographic change as well as pressure from the European Union and national government are forcing
organisations to change age-discriminatory HRM approaches. Based on a qualitative analysis of eight
British and German organisations, we found that commitment, scope, coverage and implementation of
age management differ due to country-specific institutions, particularly government, in nudging
employers and unions to preferred age practices. This confirms the path dependency concept suggested
by institutional theory. Nevertheless, we also found that industry-specific factors mediate the
implementation of age management, leading to some convergence across countries. This indicates that
organisations deviate from the institutional path to implement practices that they deem important.
Contact: Dr Heike Schröder, Institute for Human Resource Management, Vienna University of
Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, Vienna 1020, Austria. Email: h.s.schroder@
gmail.com
Keywords: age management; firm level; Britain; Germany; case study; qualitative research
INTRODUCTION
In most industrialised societies, demographic change is leading to ageing workforces (OECD,
2006), compelling firms to implement HRM that considers the productivity and inclusion of
all employees, regardless of age. In fact, some organisations are already changing potentially
age-discriminatory approaches by fostering life phase-oriented HRM (Maltby, 2011), which can
help maintain older workers’ productivity (Boehm et al., 2013; Kooij et al., 2013). Also, national
governments aim to introduce policies that extend individuals’ working lives (Taylor, 2004), and
most recent labour market data show a reversal of early retirementtrends in some parts of Europe
(Ebbinghaus and Hofäcker, 2013). However, organisational-level HRM is, for the most part, still
characterised by discrimination of older employees in recruitment, training and development
(Woodet al., 2008; Walker and Maltby,2012), particularly by line managers who are often unaware
or unconcerned with both public policies and their organisations’ HR policies concerning age and
work (Flynn, 2010). Further, at the national policy-level, some countries still have strong early
retirement cultures, pulling or pushing older workers out of employment through financial
incentives and/or lay-offs based on performance criteria (Muller-Camen et al., 2011).
Nevertheless, there is increasing pressure for organisations to abandon age-discriminatory
HRM. For example, population ageing (OECD, 2006) is a significant convergence factor that is
reflected at the policy level in the form of European Union (EU) measures to encourage and
require member states to raise the employment levels of people aged 55–64, and to raise real
bs_bs_banner
doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12043
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, VOL 24 NO 4, 2014394
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Please cite this article in press as: Schröder, H., Muller-Camen, M. and Flynn, M. (2014) ‘The management of an ageing workforce: organisational
policies in Germany and Britain’. Human Resource Management Journal 24: 4, 394–409.
retirement ages (Kok, 2004). The most significant EU policy, the Employment Equality (Age)
Directive 2000/78/EC, prohibits workplace age discrimination and was transposed into UK and
German law in 2006.
However, organisations face a ‘plurality of logics’ (Morgan and Kristensen, 2006: 1472) that
both constrain and facilitate management in following preferred approaches to HRM, and may
hence not necessarily respond to EU pressure to change their approaches to managing older
workers. On the one hand, businesses might have a shared interest with the EU in dismantling
national-level social institutions that support an early retirement culture. They may share the
EU’s agenda of reducing pension costs, and in the case of multinational companies (MNCs)
seek to weaken institutions that represent barriers to market entry (Morgan, 2012). On the other,
they may seek to extinguish even limited EU mandates, realised through national initiatives
that introduce new regulations. Further, EU action to raise retirement age could create a ‘chain
of equivalence’ (Contu et al., 2013: 367) between managers and unions who may have a shared
interest in maintaining an early retirement culture.
AGE MANAGEMENT AND NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
National context, as shaped by the degree of coordination (Hall and Soskice, 2001), as well as
ownership, non-ownership and employment relations (Whitley, 1999), compel managers to take
local path-dependent approaches to management. While Hall and Soskice’s (2001) variety of
capitalism (VoC) approach did not consider the state as a significant institution in influencing
firm behaviour, Whitley’s (1999) national business systems (NBS) approach, among others,
refuted this perspective and regarded the state as one of the main institutions that structure
business systems (Wood and Lane, 2012). Nevertheless, Streeck and Thelen (2005) discuss
whether the state remains a relevant institution in this respect, while Wood and Lane (2012)
argue that changes to the significance of the state, with the effect of, for example, deregulation,
have led to greater variety in firm behaviour, and hence to a weakening of the path dependency
notion.
For example, at a micro-political level, in the case of MNCs, the degree of adaptation of
headquarter policy to the host country institutional logic might be mediated by the type of
management heading international operations: while expatriates may favour implementing
home country strategies, thereby following the institutional logic of the firm’s home rather than
its host country, local managers are more likely to adapt headquarter policies to the local
context (Morgan, 2012). Furthermore, considering macro-political trends, Streeck (2008)
proposes that the strict dichotomy between liberal (LME) and coordinated market economies
(CME), as discussed in traditional VoC literature (i.e. Hall and Soskice, 2001), cannot be
maintained if considering the historical development of (national) institutions. Instead, Streeck
suggests that ‘convergence and continued divergence of national institutional arrangements
may exist side by side, the former, surprisingly, due to political and the latter to economic
reasons’ (Streeck, 2008: 26), possibly leading to internationally variegated systems (Peck and
Theodore, 2007). This is because CMEs are not just coordinated but also organised, as
institutions do not only regulate the efficiency of the market but also allow for its social
buffering through, for instance, welfare arrangements (Streeck, 2011). While CMEs might
become less organised as their political regimes become more liberalised (hence reducing social
provisions), their production regimes remain coordinated (Höpner, 2005). As a consequence,
firms’ social obligations in CMEs might decrease.
This suggests that institutions, as well as their significance, might change over time (Thelen,
2009), and that path dependency is therefore dynamic and reflective of pressure from multiple
Heike Schröder, Michael Muller-Camen and Matthew Flynn
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, VOL 24 NO 4, 2014 395
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT