Table of Cases

• Author: Barry E. Hill
• Pages: 18-19

Page xviii Environmental Justice: Legal Theory and Practice, 3rd Edition

Table of C ase s

AES Puerto Rico, L.P. v. Trujillo-Panisse ............................................................................................. 127

Alexander v. Sandoval .......................................................................................................................... 663

Ball et al. v. Union Carbide Corp. ........................................................................................................ 545

Bean v. Southwestern Waste Management Corp. ..................................................................................510

Board of Commissioners of LaPorte County, Board of Commissioners of Porter County, Town of

Beverly Shores and Town of Pines, Appellants-Petitioners v. Great Lakes Transfer, LLC and

the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Appellees-Respondents ......................792

Center for Biological Diversity et al. v. County of San Bernardino and Nursery Products, L LC .......... 739

Communities Against Runway Expansion, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration ............................ 796

Communities for a Better Environment et al. v. City of Richmond and Chevron Products Co. ............718

Darensburg 192 v. Metropolitan Transportation Commission ..............................................................513

Eagle Environmental II Ltd. Partnership v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania....................................... 780

East-Bibb Twiggs Neighborhood Ass’n v. Macon-Bibb County Planning & Zoning Commission ........518

Elizondo et al. v. Royal Metal Finishing, Inc. .......................................................................................535

El Pueblo Para el Aire y Aqua Limpio v. County of Kings .............................................................679, 683

Environment Texas Citizen Lobby, Inc. et al. v. ExxonMobil Corporation et al. ..................................703

Hartford Park Tenants Ass’n v. Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management ..........687, 693

Hinds County v. Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Madison County and

Bilberry Family Limited Part nership and Madison County Board of Supervisors ....................... 788

Hopi Tribe v. e City of Flagsta ....................................................................................................... 759

Houston et al. v. City of Cocoa et al. ....................................................................................556, 563, 565

In re American Marine Rail, LLC ........................................................................................................ 774

In re Chemical Waste Management of Indiana, Inc. ............................................................................444

In re Chula Vista Energy Upgrade Project............................................................................................ 272

In re Envotech, Ltd. Partnership .......................................................................................................... 445

In re Knauf Fiber Glass, GmbH ........................................................................................................... 449

In re South Bronx! et al. v. New York City Industrial Development Agency et al. ................................ 122

In the Matter of Amendment to the Madison County Solid Waste Management

Plan (Re Addition of North County Line Municipal Solid Waste Land ll)................................. 785

In the Matter of Louisiana Energ y Services, L.P. .......................................................................... 236, 238

In the Matter of the Application of Rhino Environmental Ser vices ...................................................... 764

Johnson et al. v. Orleans Parish School Board et al............................................................................... 102

Kelsey Cascadia Rose Juliana et al. v. United States of America et al. ................................................... 954

Latin Americans for Social and Economic Development v. Federal Highway Administration ...............552

Mays v. Snyder ..................................................................................................................................59, 69

Michelle Phillips, an infa nt by her mother and natural guardia n, Rosemarie Phillips, and

Rosemarie Phillips, individua lly v. e City of New York ........................................................... 100

Miller et al. v. City of Dallas ................................................................................................................ 526

Mossville Environmental Action Now v. United States ........................................................................ 932

Neighbors for a Toxic Free Community et al. v. Vulcan Materials Co. ................................................. 246

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et.al. v. South Coast Air Qua lity Management District .......696

Nonnon et al. v. City of New York ......................................................................................................... 98

Padres Hacia Una Vida Mejor et al. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et a l. .............................591

Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma v. Eagle Road Oil, LLC .......................................................................... 200

R.I.S.E., Inc. v. Kay et al. ..................................................................................................................... 522

Robinson Township, Washington County, PA et al. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al. ......148, 157

Rolan v. Atlantic Richeld Co. .............................................................................................................. 90

Romo v. Brown ..............................................................................................162, 174, 180, 184, 193, 197