Menopause and the workplace: New directions in HRM research and HR practice

AuthorJo Brewis,Joanne Duberley,Vanessa Beck,Andrea Davies,Carol Atkinson
Published date01 January 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12294
Date01 January 2021
REVIEW
Menopause and the workplace: New directions
in HRM research and HR practice
Carol Atkinson
1
| Vanessa Beck
2
| Jo Brewis
3
|
Andrea Davies
4
| Joanne Duberley
5
1
Department of People and Performance,
Manchester Metropolitan University Business
School, Manchester, UK
2
Department of Management, School of
Economics, Finance and Management,
University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
3
Department of People and Organisations,
The Open University Business School, Milton
Keynes, UK
4
Department of Strategic Management and
Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law, De
Montfort University, Leicester, UK
5
Department of Management, Birmingham
Business School, University of Birmingham,
University House, Birmingham, UK
Correspondence
Jo Brewis, Department of People and
Organisations, The Open University Business
School, Michael Young Building, Walton Hall,
Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK.
Email: joanna.brewis@open.ac.uk
[Correction added on 8 May 2020, after first
online publication: the order of authors has
been updated in this current version.]
Abstract
This paper offers two key arguments. The first is that HRM
scholars and HR practitioners need to pay a good deal more
attention to the bi-directional relationship between meno-
pause and the workplacehow menopausal symptoms can
affect women's experience of work and how work can exac-
erbate a woman's symptoms. We outline the social respon-
sibility, demographic, legal and business cases which explain
the urgency of more research and more concerted practice
in this area. Our second argument concerns the importance
of future research and practice adopting an intersectional
political economy approach, in order to better understand
the considerable differences between how women going
through menopause transition experience work. Here, we
offer arguments ranging from the macro- through the
meso- down to the micro-level of these differences, in so
doing setting an agenda for the work to come on this very
significant issue.
KEYWORDS
bio-medical approach, bio-psycho-cultural approach,
intersectional political economy, menopause, work
1|INTRODUCTION
This paper focuses on the two-way relationship between menopause and workin other words, how symptoms can
make working life more challenging for women in menopause transition or post-menopause; and how, in turn, work-
ing life might make menopause symptoms worse. Menopause refers to the point in a woman's life when she has not
menstruated for a year. On average women attain menopause at 51, and transition or peri-menopausal symptoms
Received: 29 May 2019 Revised: 18 February 2020 Accepted: 7 April 2020
DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12294
Hum Resour Manag J. 2021;31:4964. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/hrmj © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 49
begin at 48, sometimes lasting for a decade or more into post-menopause. However, some women experience men-
opause (much) earlier, due to what is known clinically as premature or primary ovarian insufficiency. It is usually a
natural experience for cis women and some of those who identify as transgender or gender non-conforming
(TGNC).
1
But others are plunged into cliff edgemenopause because of medical treatments, for example, for cancer
or oophorectomies.
First, we discuss why HRM scholars and HR practitioners should pay attention to menopause as a workplace
issue. Second, we argue that menopause in the context of work needs to be understood through what we call an
intersectional political economy approach, which integrates feminist political economy and intersectionality theory.
Feminist political economy insists on gendering a macro-level political economy analysis of relationships between
individuals, the state, the economy and wider society. Intersectionality, also originating in feminist scholarship
(Crenshaw, 1989) allows us to include additional meso- and micro-level self-identifications and identifications per-
formed by others beyond gender, including occupation, class, employment type, income, education, sexuality, (dis)
ability, motherhood, race, ethnicity, migration status and age in workplace analysis. It offers the metaphor of a cross-
roads of these factors. Intersectionality therefore treats these categories of difference not as separate, stable axes
of identity [or context] that criss-cross each other in a specific subjectivity [but as] systems of meaning and under-
standing that act together in a formative way to define each other(de Souza, Brewis, & Rumens, 2016, p. 605).
Drawing these two complementary perspectives together into an intersectional political economy approach thus
affords exploration of macro-, meso- and micro-level factors which might inform women's experiences of menopause
transition in the workplace.
Applying an intersectional political economy approach also supports a move beyond a micro-level bio-medical
approach to menopause as a disease or form of decline, the problems with which we outline later, while expanding a
bio-psycho-cultural approach as an alternative. The latter, which has gained traction in the wider menopause litera-
ture since the 1990s, contends that a woman's experience of menopause must be understood in the context of both
her psychological make-up and her socio-cultural locationthemselves interconnected in a tangled webof relations
Practitioner Notes
What is currently known
HRM research currently pays almost no attention to the issue of menopause in the workplace, and HR
policy and practice is also lacking in this area.
We set out the social responsibility, demographic, legal and business reasons as to why this is
problematic.
What this paper adds
We provide an agenda for future HRM research into the menopause, based on what we call an
intersectional political economy approach.
This connects together macro-, meso- and micro-levels of women's experiences of menopause and the
workplace in order to grasp the significant differences between these experiences more accurately.
The implications for practitioners
We argue that HR policy and practice on menopause in the workplace should, similarly, address key
issues identified in this paper.
50 ATKINSON ET AL.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT