Jury Selection

AuthorEdward L. Birnbaum/Carl T. Grasso/Justice Ariel E. Belen
Pages581-626
JURY SELECTION
20-1
CHAPTER 20
JURY SELECTION
I. PRINCIPLES AND GOALS
§20:01 Right to Voir Dire
§20:02 Purpose of Voir Dire
§20:03 Importance of Jury Selection
§20:04 Selection Is Actually Deselecting
§20:05 Fair Panel of Peers
§20:06 Be Prepared to Proceed With the Trial
II. PROCEDURE
A. General Points
§20:10 General Principles
§20:11 Voir Dire in Bifurcated Trial
§20:12 Presence of Judge
§20:13 Judicial Voir Dire
§20:14 Judge Not Available
§20:15 Time Limits on Voir Dire
§20:16 Presence of Parties
§20:17 Stipulations to Excuse a Juror
§20:18 Excusing Prospective Jurors
B. Alternative Methods
§20:30 Overview of Methods
§20:31 White’s Method
§20:32 Struck Method
§20:33 Strike and Replace Method
§20:34 Comparison of Methods
III. CHALLENGE TO THE ARRAY
§20:40 Panelist Poisons the Well
§20:41 Makeup of Community
§20:42 Timing of a Challenge to the Array
IV. EXAMINING PROSPECTIVE JURORS
A. Examining Entire Panel
1. All Counsel
§20:50 Establish Credibility
§20:51 Relax Panel Members
§20:52 Preliminary Remarks: Introduce Case and Themes
§20:53 “Programming” the Panel
JURY SELECTION
New York Trial Notebook 20-2
§20:54 Objecting During Voir Dire
§20:55 Determine the Prospect’s Honesty
§20:56 Attitudes About Lawyers
§20:57 Responding to Panel Comments
§20:58 Do Not Waste Time
§20:59 Do Not Embarrass Panel Members
§20:60 Inquire About Prospects’ Philosophy
§20:61 Inquire About Potential Evidence
2. Plaintiff’s Counsel
§20:70 Primacy: Take Advantage of Being First
§20:71 Allay General Suspicions
§20:72 Humanize the Case
§20:73 Address Weaknesses
§20:74 Jury Consultants
3. Defendant’s Counsel
§20:80 Remind the Panel to Keep an Open Mind
§20:81 Humanize Defendant
B. Examining Individual Panel Members
1. In General
§20:90 Juror Questionnaires
§20:91 Required General Information
§20:91.1 Using Social Media and the Internet to Research Prospective Jurors
§20:92 Question All Panel Members
§20:93 Minimize Repetition
§20:94 Prejudicial Responses
§20:95 Questioning Alternate Jurors
2. Gaining Commitment
§20:100 Sample Commitment Questions
§20:101 Use a Fair Selection of “Commitment” Questions
§20:102 Establish Commitments From Each Juror Prospect
§20:103 Handicapped or Disabled Prospective Jurors
3. Case Specif‌ic Information
§20:110 Automobile Accident
§20:111 Medical Malpractice
§20:112 Products Liability
§20:113 Corporate Party
§20:114 Governmental Entity Party
V. CHALLENGES FOR CAUSE
A. Grounds
§20:120 General Principles
§20:121 Statutory Grounds
§20:122 Other Grounds
B. Procedure
§20:130 In General
§20:131 Challenge for Cause Granted
§20:132 Challenge for Cause Denied
VI. PEREMP TORY CHALLENGES
A. Grounds
§20:140 General Principles
§20:141 Contesting Peremptory Challenges: Batson
§20:142 Batson Challenge Procedure
§20:143 Batson Challenge Factors
§20:144 Batson Challenge Remedies/Penalties
JURY SELECTION
20-3 Jury Selection
B. Number of Peremptory Challenges Allowed
§20:150 Generally Three per Side
§20:151 Court’s Discretion to Grant More
§20:152 Third Party Peremptory Challenges
VII. ALTERNATE JURORS
§20:160 Purpose; Selection Method
§20:161 Number
§20:162 Challenges to Alternates
§20:163 Nondesignated Alternates
VIII. PRESERVING THE RECORD
§20:170 Record Voir Dire
§20:171 Preliminary Rulings on Expected Conduct
§20:172 Objections to Voir Dire

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT