Job stressors and voluntary work behaviours: mediating effect of emotion and moderating roles of personality and emotional intelligence

AuthorIain Coyne,Dion Greenidge
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12044
Date01 November 2014
Published date01 November 2014
Job stressors and voluntary work behaviours:
mediating effect of emotion and moderating roles
of personality and emotional intelligence
Dion Greenidge, Department of Management Studies, University of the West Indies
Iain Coyne, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of
Nottingham
Human Resource Management Journal, Vol 24, no 4, 2014, pages 479–495
Framed within an emotion-centred model, the current study investigated the mediating role of negative
and positive emotion between job stressors and counterproductive work behaviours (CWB) and
organisational citizenship behaviours, and the moderating effects of personality and ability-based
emotional intelligence (EI) on the relationships between job stressors and emotions. Results from a
sample of 202 Caribbean employees across eight public and private sector organisations showed that both
positive and negative emotion mediated the relation between job stressors and citizenship behaviours,
whereas only negative emotion was found to mediate the relation between job stressors and CWB. Some
support was found for the moderating effects of personality and EI. Implications for research and practice
are discussed.
Contact: Dr Dion Greenidge, Department of Management Studies, University of the West
Indies, Cave Hill Campus, P.O. Box 64, Barbados. Email: dion.greenidge@cavehill.uwi.edu
Keywords: emotion; voluntary work behaviours; job stressors; Big Five personality; emotional
intelligence
INTRODUCTION
Organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) and counterproductive work behaviour
(CWB) are typically seen as discretionary, non-task in nature and, coupled with task
performance, represent three broad domains of job performance (Rotundo and Sackett,
2002). In the HR literature, OCB (sometimes termed extra-role behaviour or discretionary work
behaviour) has received recent attention (Gong et al., 2010; Frenkel et al., 2012) and is viewed as
an HR-related outcome of HRM (Knies and Leisink, 2014). Indeed, OCB ‘. . . is seen as the
critical factor in linking employee responses to performance . . .’ (Purcell and Hutchinson, 2007:
6). Within the same HR domain, CWB has been considered at the level of specific behaviours,
such as absenteeism (e.g. Hopkins, 2014) and workplace bullying (e.g. Woodrow and Guest,
2014), as well as the broader CWB concept (e.g. Chao et al., 2011). In the people
management–performance causal chain (Purcell and Hutchinson, 2007), discretionary
behaviour and attendance (a specific form of CWB) coupled with task behaviour are
hypothesised to influence organisational effectiveness.
However, although OCB and CWB are important HR-related outcomes of people manage-
ment, they have tended to be researched in isolation. Yet with consensus that both behaviours can
be conceptualised via distinct subgroups of organisationally and individually directed
behaviours (Bennett and Robinson, 2000; Gruys and Sackett, 2003), researchers have become more
interested in the commonality between the two constructs and theoretical explanations for why
people engage in them (Dalal, 2005; Spector and Fox, 2010). One such theory, Spector and Fox’s
(2002) emotion-centred model, postulates that an employee’s emotional reactions are induced by
bs_bs_banner
doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12044
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, VOL 24 NO 4, 2014 479
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Please cite this article in press as: Greenidge, D. and Coyne, I. (2014) ‘Job stressors and voluntary work behaviours: mediating effect of emotion
and moderating roles of personality and emotional intelligence’. Human Resource Management Journal 24: 4, 479–495.
his/her appraisal of the work environment, and that induced emotion could lead to OCB or CWB.
Positive emotion should produce OCB while negative emotions should produce CWB. Further-
more, personality and perceived control over work tasks are hypothesised to moderate the
relationship between job stressors and emotions. The purpose of our investigation was to develop
further some of the proposed relationships in Spector and Fox’s model. Specifically, we tested the
main mediation propositions of positive and negative emotion, as well as including the
moderating effects of the Big Five personality traits and ability-based emotional intelligence (EI).
As emotion plays a central role in Spector and Fox’s model, we included EI since an individual’s
ability to understand and regulate his/her emotions so as to attain desired affective states and
adaptive outcomes are particularly relevant (Wongand Law, 2002). Figure 1 shows the proposed
relationships to be tested in this study.
This study constitutes the first effort, to our knowledge, to explore the mediating effect of
positive emotion on the relationship between job stressors and citizenship behaviours, and the
moderating effects of Big Five personality traits and EI on relations between job stressors and
emotions. Moreover, research on the role of emotions, its causes, expression and consequences
in organisational settings are still vastly fragmented and limited (Brief and Weiss, 2002).
Therefore, this study enhances our theoretical understanding of how the work environment,
emotion and individual differences combine to influence OCB and CWB. Furthermore, such
knowledge would allow HR managers and/or practitioners to better develop appropriate
interventions aimed at reducing negative workplace behaviours such as CWB, and enhancing
positive workplace behaviours such as OCB. Hence, HR policies and practices could be better
directed to achieve more favourable HRM outcomes.
Theoretical framework
Emotion and OCB/CWB Emotion is defined as ‘adaptive behavioural and physiological
response tendencies that are called forth directly by evolutionarily significant situations’ (Gross,
Figure 1 Proposed relationships among study variables
Negative
Emotion
Positive
Emotion
Personality
Counterproductive
Work Behaviour
Organisational
Citizenship
Behaviour
Emotional
Intelligence
Stressors Appraisal/
Interpretation
-+
++
Job stressors and voluntary work behaviours
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, VOL 24 NO 4, 2014480
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT