Implied consent

AuthorDon Bartell/Mary Catherine McMurray/Anne ImObersteg
Pages77-94
3-1
CHAPTER 3
IMPLIED CONSENT
I. IMPLIED CONSENT
§3:01 Validity of Implied Consent Laws
§3:01.1 Birchf‌ield Questions
§3:01.2 The Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine
§3:02 Every State Has an Implied Consent Law
§3:03 Federal Land Refusals
II. CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES
A. United States Supreme Court Decisions
§3:10 Unconscious Driver; No Statute
§3:11 Conscious Driver; No Statute
§3:12 Implied Consent Statute
§3:13 Missouri v. McNeely and the Need for a Warrant
B. State Challenges
§3:20 Due Process
§3:21 Self-Incrimination
§3:22 Illegal Search Cases
C. Rational Basis Challenges
§3:25 Only Some Conceivable Justif‌ication Needed
§3:26 Burden of Proof is on the Challenger
III. SUCCESSFUL DEFENSES TO REFUSAL ALLEGATIONS
§3:30 Attack Compliance With Procedure
§3:31 Untimely Warning
§3:32 Misinformation in Warning
§3:33 Refusal to Sign Hospital Release Is Not a Lack of Consent
§3:34 Failure to Notify of Intent to Revoke License
§3:35 Right to an Attorney Before Choosing a Test
§3:36 Miranda-Induced Confusion
IV. UNSUCCESSFUL DEFENSES TO REFUSAL ALLEGATIONS
§3:40 Generally Delay Equals Refusal
§3:41 Equivocation Equals Refusal
§3:42 Conditional Consent
IMPLIED CONSENT
Attacking and Defending Drunk Driving Tests 3-2
IMPLIED CONSENT
§3:43 Change of Mind After Refusal Usually Equals Refusal
V. MISCELLANEOUS DMV HEARING ISSUES
§3:50 Delayed Discovery
§3:51 Calibration Checks Reading High
§3:52 Duress and Necessity Defenses at DMV Hearings
VI. FILING A WRIT TO CHALLENGE A DMV HEARING LICENSE SUSPENSION
§3:60 Sample Writ of Mandate

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT