Fostering employees' proactive strategic engagement: Individual and contextual antecedents

AuthorIsabell M. Welpe,Matthias Spörrle,Andranik Tumasjan,Maria Strobel
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12134
Date01 January 2017
Published date01 January 2017
Fostering employeesproactive strategic
engagement: Individual and contextual
antecedents
Maria Strobel*,Technical Universityof Munich and BavarianState Institute for Higher
Education Research and Planning, Germany
Andranik Tumasjan*, Technical University of Munich, Germany
MatthiasSpörrle, Privatuniversität Schloss Seeburg, Seekirchen am Wallersee, Germany
Isabell M. Welpe, Technical University of Munich and Bavarian State Institute for
Higher Education Research and Planning, Germany
Human Resource Management Journal, Vol 27, no 1, 2017,pages 113132
Proactive strategic scanning is an important aspect of employee proactivity and contributes to engaging
employees in the organisation-wide strategy process. It also contributes to strategic renewal and innovation
by helping to identify potential strategic opportunities and threats. However, little is known about its
antecedents and how HRM may support this valuable resource. To address this gap, we develop and test a
model of individual and contextual antecedents of proactive strategic scanning. We hypothesise and find a
positive effect of future-focused personality on strategic scanning which is mediated by promotion-focused
self-regulation at work. Moreover, we investigate how work design functions as a contextual boundary
condition of this mediated effect. The effect is strengthened under high social support but is not influenced
by the level of decision-making autonomy. Our findings point to specific variables which can be targeted by
HRM to enhance employeesstrategic engagement and innovativebehaviour.
Contact: Maria Strobel, Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Management, Germany.
Email: maria.strobel@tum.de
Keywords: strategic engagement; employee involvement in strategy; discretionary behaviour;
proactive behaviour; innovation; innovative behaviour
INTRODUCTION
Proactive strategic scanning pertains to proactively surveying the organizations
environment to identify ways to ensure a fit between the organization and its
environment, such as identifying ways the organization might respond to emerging
markets or actively searching the environment for future organizational threats and
opportunities(Parker and Collins, 2010: 637). Thus, proactive strategic scanning is a
discretionary work behaviour that has the potential to ultimately affect an organisations
strategy through its contribution to an organisation-wide strategy-making process (Parker
and Collins, 2010). Given the current rapid and disruptive evolution in product-market
domains, involving a broad base of employees in strategy-making through strategic scanning
becomes increasingly important (Merchant, 2010). For example, the German publishing
company Haufe, which transitioned from a traditional print publisher to a provider of digital
education products and consulting, attributes its success to its (lower-level) employees who
* The first two authors contributed equally to this study.
HUMAN RESOURCEMANAGEMENT JOURNAL, VOL27, NO 1, 2017 113
©2017 John Wiley& Sons Ltd
Pleasecite this articlein press as: Strobel,M., Tumasjan, A., Spörrle,M. and Welpe, I.M.(2017) Fosteringemployeesproactivestrategic engagement:
Individualand contextualantecedents.HumanResource ManagementJournal 27:1,113132
doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12134
bs_bs_banner
are close to customers and marketsand therefore able to quickly detectenvironmental changes
(Haufe, 2014).
A considerable body of research documents the importance of such bottom-up strategic
activities and their contribution to firm performance, especially in dynamic environments
(e.g. Hart and Banbury, 1994; Floyd and Lane, 2000; Andersen, 2004; Andersen and Nielsen,
2009). Research shows that strategic scanning behaviour generates several beneficial firm
outcomes, such as increased championing of innovations (Howell and Shea, 2001; Wu et al.,
2013) and higher levels of firm performance(Miller and Lee, 2001). Based on a resource-based
view (RBV) perspective (Barney, 1991; Boxall, 1996), firms can build a valuable resource that
may give them a competitive advantage by systematically fostering strategy processes
throughout the organisation. This reasoning is in line with Boxall (1996: 66), who referring
to Hart and Banburys(1994)seminalworkconcludes tha t [n]ot only those firms with
astute leadership at the top but those that can combine this strength with deep employee
involvement in strategic decision-making appear to be more effective.
However,despite the relevanceof strategic scanning,little is known about its individualand
contextual antecedents in organisations, specifically regarding how this valuable type of
behaviour can be fostered among all employees rather than involving only top managers or
specialised organisational units (Stieger et al., 2012). Our study focuses on the potential of
organisational members to contribute to strategy by engaging in proactive strategic scanning,
adding value to HRM and strategy frameworks (e.g. Jiang et al., 2012; Ployhart and Hale,
2014) in the following three ways.
First, we contribute to the HRM literature on fostering employeesstrategic engagement
(Boswell, 2006; Buller and McEvoy, 2012) by investigating the behavioural mechanisms and
boundary conditions that give rise to proactive strategic scanning behaviour (Parker and
Collins,2010). We concentrateon white-collarworkers in knowledge-intensivecontexts because
for such workers (rather than blue-collar workers) engaging in the strategic process may be
considered especially relevant. Building on the organisational behaviour literature on
proactivity (Parker and Collins, 2010) and on the micro-foundations of strategy perspective
(Coff and Kryscynski, 2011; Ployhart and Hale, 2014), our research adds to the understanding
of buildingup employee engagementin strategy as a firmsstrategicresource.Wethusrespond
to callsfor investigatingthe micro-foundations of an organisation-widestrategy process(Stieger
et al., 2012; Barney and Felin, 2013). Specifically, weenrich the literature by testing a model that
combines dispositional, motivational and contextual components (based on the ability-
motivation-opportunity framework; Boxall and Purcell, 2011) and by demonstrating how these
components coalesce in giving rise to strategically valuable discretionary employee behaviour.
Second, we contribute to laying the groundwork for designing and investigating
strategically targeted HR systems (Jackson et al., 2014; Jiang et al., 2015) which focus on
enhancing strategic engagement and innovative behaviour. Providing evidence on the
relationships between constructs that can be targeted by specific HR policies and practices,
our research informsstudies aiming at forming coherent HR systemsthat can realise synergies
based on the interrelationships betweenunderlying behaviouralmechanisms (Chadwick,2010;
Jiang et al., 2012).
Third, we contribute to the emerging stream of research on proactive strategic behaviour
(Parker and Collins, 2010) by empirically investigating the joint dispositional, motivational
and contextual antecedents of this specific proactivity dimension. In doing so, we connect to
theoretical conceptualisations of the antecedents of proactive behaviour (Parker et al., 2010)
and research on regulatory focus as a motivational mediator between dispositions and
behavioural outcomes(Lanaj et al., 2012).
Future focusand strategic scanning
114 HUMANRESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL,VOL 27, NO 1, 2017
©2017 John Wiley& Sons Ltd.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT