Embeddedness across contexts: A two‐country study on the additive and buffering effects of job embeddedness on employee turnover

AuthorAnna Sender,Lea Rutishauser,Bruno Staffelbach
Published date01 April 2018
Date01 April 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12183
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Embeddedness across contexts: A twocountry
study on the additive and buffering effects of job
embeddedness on employee turnover
Anna Sender |Lea Rutishauser |Bruno Staffelbach
Center for Human Resource Management
(CEHRM), University of Lucerne, Switzerland
Correspondence
Anna Sender, Center for Human Resource
Management (CEHRM), Frohburgstrasse 3,
P.O. Box 4466, Lucerne 6002, Switzerland.
Email: anna.sender@unilu.ch
Funding information
Comission for Technology and Innovation CTI,
Grant/Award Number: 14056.2 PFESES
Abstract
Despite the growing body of literature on the effects of job
embeddedness on turnover, there are few studies on how job
embeddedness operates in different countries. This study, based
on the Conservation of Resources theory, addresses this research
gap by investigating both the additive and the buffering effects of
onthejob and offthejob embeddedness using employee data
from China (n= 373) and Switzerland (n= 268). Results showed that
onthejob embeddedness reduced the likelihood of turnover more
strongly in Switzerland than in China (additive effect). Additionally,
in China, the unsolicited job offerturnover relationship was stron-
ger when employees had lower levels of offthejob embeddedness
(buffering effect). This research contributes to the understanding of
the relative role of onthejob and offthejob embeddedness for
turnover in different countries.
KEYWORDS
Conservation of Resources theory, employeeturnover, job
embeddedness,unsolicited job offers
1|INTRODUCTION
High employee turnover increases costs and may be detrimental to organisational performance (Dess & Shaw, 2001;
Glebbeek & Bax, 2004; Holtom, Mitchell, Lee, & Inderrieden, 2005; Koys, 2001). Consequently, a large body of
research has focused on exploring antecedents of employee turnover. For example, empirical research has demon-
strated that job embeddedness, that is, a net or a web in which the employee can become stuck(Mitchell, Holtom,
Lee, Sablynski, & Erez, 2001, p. 1104), reduces the likelihood of turnover, after controlling for other salient predictors
such as job satisfaction, organisational commitment, or job alternatives (additive effects of job embeddedness; Jiang,
Liu, McKay, Lee, & Mitchell, 2012; Mitchell et al., 2001). Moreover, embedded employees react less strongly to
negative events, such as being passed over for promotion or the lack of a pay rise (buffering effects of job
embeddedness; Burton, Holtom, Sablynski, Mitchell, & Lee, 2010).
This study has been realised using support from the Commission for Technology and Innovation CTI, Switzerland (14056.2 PFESES).
Received: 1 February 2016 Revised: 7 September 2017 Accepted: 11 November 2017
DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12183
340 © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Hum Resour Manag J. 2018;28:340356.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/hrmj
The results of a metaanalytic study on the effects of job embeddedness on employee turnover by Jiang et al.
(2012) indicate that effect sizes vary across contexts. However, comparative studies on additive effects of job
embeddedness across contexts are rare (for exceptions, see Mallol, Holtom, & Lee, 2007; Ramesh & Gelfand, 2010;
Tanova & Holtom, 2008). Furthermore, only a few studies have examined the moderating role of job embeddedness,
and these studies were only conducted in one country (e.g., Burton et al., 2010; Mignonac, 2008; Swider, Boswell, &
Zimmerman, 2011). As Jiang et al. (2012) concluded, researchers are yet to understand the situations where the
effects of job embeddedness on turnover are augmented or attenuated(p. 1084).
In this study, using the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory (Hobfoll, 1989), we explore both the additive and
buffering effects of onthejob and offthejob embeddedness in China and Switzerland. We contribute to the turnover
literature in three ways. First, we contribute to theoretical and empirical developments in the COR theory. Although
COR theory is viewed as a general motivational theory, most research has focused on its applications in stress and
burnout literature, leaving other areas (such as employee turnover) less explored (Harris, Wheeler, & Kacmar, 2011).
Additionally, given the limited research on the role of context within COR theory literature (Halbesleben, Neveu,
PaustianUnderdahl, & Westman, 2014), this study advances the understanding of how national context may influence
the value of resources and thus turnover decisions. Second, given the limited comparative research on job
embeddedness, we aim to contribute to the understanding of the additive and buffering effects of job embeddedness
in different national contexts. Third, we investigate the buffering effects of job embeddedness in the relationship
between unsolicited job offers and voluntary turnover. Unsolicited job offers are unexpected and thus may drive turn-
over among those employees who would not normally have initiated a job search themselves, as they are generally
satisfied with their jobs or assume a lack of alternatives. Therefore, this study addresses the call for investigation as
to what it takes to retain employees who have received unexpected job offers (Lee, Gerhart, Weller, & Trevor, 2008).
2|ADDITIVE EFFECTS OF JOB EMBEDDEDNESS
Job embeddedness is composed of three dimensions: links, fit, and sacrifice; these are related both to the organisation
(onthejob embeddedness) and to the community (offthejob embeddedness; Jiang et al., 2012; Mitchell et al., 2001;
Zhang, Fried, & Griffeth, 2012). Onthejob links are both formal and informal connections to other people in the orga-
nisation. Individuals whose family members live nearby and who have a large circle of friends in the community are
more offthejob embedded in terms of links through living in thatcommunity. The fit dimension of job embeddedness
is the individual's compatibility with the organisation (e.g., fit to organisational culture) and community (e.g., fit to
neighbourhood; Mitchell et al., 2001). The sacrifice dimension of job embeddedness covers psychological and material
costs associated with leaving, such as relatively lucrative health care or retirement benefits in the organisation and
leisure opportunities in the community (Mitchell et al., 2001).
Since the initial conceptualisation of job embeddedness by Mitchell et al. (2001), job embeddedness literature has
grown both theoretically and empirically (Ng & Feldman, 2007; Ramesh & Gelfand, 2010). More recently, Kiazad,
Holtom, Hom, and Newman (2015) introduced the CORbased job embeddedness model, which advances the under-
standing of the effects of job embeddedness using COR theory (Kiazad, Seibert, & Kraimer, 2014). In line with COR
theory, individuals are motivated to acquire, protect, and retain their resources (Hobfoll, 1989), that is, anything per-
ceived by the individual to help attain his or her goals(Halbesleben et al., 2014, p. 1338). The first principle of COR
theory, the primacy of resource loss, postulates that the loss of resources is more salient in terms of its effects than
the gain of resources (Hobfoll, 2001). The second principle of COR theory indicates that individuals need to invest
resources to protect their current resources and to gain future resources (Hobfoll, 2001).
The CORbased job embeddedness model postulates that job embeddedness constitutes a resource for individ-
uals, as it may be instrumental in goal attainment, such as career progression or income growth (Halbesleben et al.,
2014; Kiazad et al., 2015). Moreover, job embeddedness may be viewed as a cumulative resource (resource caravan),
with greater value when bundled than in parts (Wheeler, Harris, & Sablynski, 2012). Given that employees protect
SENDER ET AL.341

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT