Do social media enhance constructive employee voice all of the time or just some of the time?

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12081
AuthorEmma Parry,Paul Flowers,Graeme Martin
Date01 November 2015
Published date01 November 2015
Do social media enhance constructive employee
voice all of the time or just some of the time?
Graeme Martin, University of Dundee
Emma Parry and Paul Flowers, Cranfield School of Management
Human Resource Management Journal, Vol 25, no 4, 2015, pages 541–562
Social media are becoming widely adopted by organisations to encourage collaboration and communication.
We seek to understand how social media can enhance employee voice and employees’ willingness to engage
in constructive dialogue with both colleagues and managers. By drawing on literature on employee voice,
signalling theory and personal control to analyse qualitative data from researchinto three strategic business
units in a major global telecommunications corporation, we find that (a) employee perceptions of personal
control and autonomy influence whether and how employees’ exercise voice through social media, and (b)
these perceptions vary according to different organisational/field-level contexts evident in the corporation.
Contact: Dr Emma Parry, Reader in Human Resource Management, Cranfield School of
Management, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK. Email: emma.parry@cranfield.ac.uk
Keywords: social media; employee voice; e-HRM; communication
INTRODUCTION
Powerful social media, including online blogs,1microblogging,2social networking sites,3
wikis,4media sharing sites and gaming technologies, have become increasingly
accessible through mobile technology (Kaplan and Haenlein, 2010). These media are
being widely adopted by the HR function in e-HR, talent management, communications, and
learning and knowledge management strategies (Martin et al., 2009; Kristl Davison et al., 2011;
London and Hall, 2011; Reddington and Francis, 2011). In doing so, the function seeks to
transform its contribution to the economic and social aims of organisations (Martin et al., 2008;
Marler, 2009; Parry and Solidaro, 2013; Bissola and Imperatori, 2014). The case for this is
typically articulated as (a) encouraging collaboration and engagement among employees,
customers, suppliers and partners, (b) sharing knowledge to create organisational learning, (c)
helping organisations communicate with a new (virtual)-generation of employees who have
grown up with such media, (d) helping organisations, employees and potential employees learn
more about each other, and (e) giving customers, business partners and employees more
opportunity to exercise ‘voice’ on key issues (Lai and Turban, 2008; Martin et al., 2009).
Such promises rest on three, essentially managerialist, arguments for enhancing employee
voice (Fox, 1985; Budd and Bhave, 2008). First, managers can use such media to encourage
individuals to exercise direct voice rather than collective voice through union channels (Bryson
et al., 2006), as social media are open to all employees with access to the Internet. Second,
employers wish employees to engage directly in dialogue with managers, to share information
with colleagues, and in some situations participate in decision-making (Martin et al., 2009).
Third, employee voice is a potential alternative to employee exit, so may help arrest
organisational decline (Hirschman, 1970; Batt et al., 2002). Thus, for example, IBM, a leading
user and marketer of social media solutions, claims to have involved more than 300,000
employees since 2001 in its well-publicised ‘Jams’, which are essentially online brainstorming
and problem-solving sessions.
bs_bs_banner
doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12081
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, VOL 25 NO 4, 2015 541
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Please cite this article in press as: Martin, G., Parry, E. and Flowers, P. (2015) ‘Do social media enhance constructive employee voice all of the time
or just some of the time?’. Human Resource Management Journal 25: 4, 541–562.
Yet, despite the growing HR interest in social media, there is little academic evidence to
support these claims for their impact on voice (Klass et al., 2012), perhaps because of their
uncritical managerialist assumptions. This gap gives rise to our research question: how, and in
what circumstances, can social media be used to enhance employee voice and employees’
willingness to engage in constructive dialogue in their organisations? By constructive dialogue,
we refer to dialogical interactions through which actors seek to cooperate with one another
rather than dialectical interactions through which opposition between actors is reinforced
(MacIntosh et al., 2012). To answer this question, we integrate insights from signalling theory in
HR and the effect of personal control felt by employees on their willingness to exercise voice and
their perceptions of social media as a means of helping them do so (Tangirala and Ramanujam,
2008; Martin and Groen-in’t Woud, 2011). This integration allows us to develop four
subquestions concerning the influence of exogenous and endogenous contexts on the voice
outcomes of the implementation of social media in practice.
To address these, we use in-depth interview data from a within-case comparison of three
strategic business units (SBUs) within a large global telecommunications company. These data
highlight the importance of leadership signals regarding social media as a precondition for
socially constructive employee voice and the importance of key exogenous and endogenous
influences in how they are read. Our contributions to the HR literature on social media
and employee voice are the following: (1) to develop earlier theory by linking signalling theory
to personal control, employee voice and engagement (Brockner et al., 2004; Tangirala and
Ramanujam, 2008; Morrison, 2011), and (2) to show how social media use is embedded in key
internal and external contexts in organisations.
Employee voice, signalling theory and personal control as influences on the potential
use of social media in organisations
Most research on employee voice is an extension of Hirschman’s (1970) work, which saw voice
as a human tendency to express discontent by generally ‘kicking up a fuss’ (p. 30). Thus, Budd
(2014: 477) sees employee voice as expressing opinions and having meaningful input into
work-related decision-making’, which includes ‘individual and collective voice, union and
non-union voice, and voice mechanisms that cover not only employment terms, but also work
autonomy and business issues. As such it is concerned with (a) whether to ‘speak up’ or remain
silent (Rees et al., 2013), (b) whether voice is exercised in a socially constructive manner to
improve decision-making (Tangirala and Ramanujam, 2008) or as a form of retributive justice
(Klass et al., 2012), and (c) the extent to which employees enjoy democratic rights in their
organisations and are able to exercise control or task autonomy in their work situations
(Wilkinson and Fay, 2011). There is a considerable literature on these topics (Morrison,
2011), particularly concerning employees’ motivations to express voice, and the situational
factors that determine individual behaviour (Klass et al., 2012). Outside of the US industrial and
organisational psychology-dominated literature, however, which sees employee voice as an
opportunity to serve organisational interests, voice is usually explored as a collective
phenomenon, linked to employee participation in decision-making and offering the potential to
challenge management (Bryson et al., 2006; Budd et al., 2010; Wilkinson and Fay, 2011; Barry and
Wilkinson, 2015). Unfortunately, individual and collective levels of analysis are rarely combined
because of the different axiological and methodological inclinations of researchers concerning
practical relevance (Nicolai and Seidl, 2010; Barry and Wilkinson, 2015). So, in this article, we
combine them to explain the potential relationship between social media and employee voice
at the individual and collective levels, and to set out some further lines of enquiry for research
on this topic.
Social media and employee voice
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, VOL 25 NO 4, 2015542
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT