Cross‐boundary working: Implications for HRM theory, methods, and practice

Date01 January 2020
AuthorNicholas Kinnie,Juani Swart
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12239
Published date01 January 2020
PROVOCATION PAPER
Crossboundary working: Implications for HRM
theory, methods, and practice
Nicholas Kinnie |Juani Swart
School of Management, University of Bath,
Bath, UK
Correspondence
Professor Nicholas Kinnie, School of
Management, University of Bath, Bath BA2
7AY, UK.
Email: n.j.kinnie@bath.ac.uk
Abstract
Major changes have taken place in work organisation, which
originate predominantly from working across organisational
boundaries. This paper argues for a more sophisticated
approach to HRM that includes three types of cross
boundary working, that is, intraorganisational,
interorganisational, and transorganisational. Herein lies the
contribution of our paper; we argue that we cannot assume
a transition from one type of working to another because
crossboundary forms of working coexist. We also need to
understand the tensions of this simultaneity at the levels
of the organisation/network, HRM systems, and the individ-
ual. We consider the impact of the simultaneous existence
of these types of crossboundary working for the following:
(a) theory, especially the development of HRM systems; (b)
methods, including an activitybased unit of analysis; and (c)
practice, where we pay attention to the challenges of con-
trol, collaboration, and consistency.
KEYWORDS
attitudes, crossboundary working, HRM systems, organisational
boundaries
1|INTRODUCTION
Transformations in the way work is organised have been so dramatic that the HRM theory designed to study them
has become anachronistic. These changes in work organisation have been characterised in various ways, including
flexible (Atkinson, 1985), boundaryless (Arthur & Rousseau, 1996), fragmented, (Marchington, Grimshaw, Rubery, &
Willmott, 2005), fissured (Weil, 2014), networked (Swart & Kinnie, 2014), and liquid (Clegg & Baumeler, 2010).
Each of these ways of working across organisational boundaries has been discussed in isolation, but there has
Received: 7 June 2017 Revised: 10 January 2019 Accepted: 29 March 2019
DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12239
86 © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/hrmj Hum Resour Manag J. 2020;30:8699.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT