Closing: What Happens Next?

AuthorRandi Karpinia
Pages681-724
681
I. Introduction
The challenge for the responsible intellectual property attorney,
once the merger or acquisition is completed, is the seamless inte-
gration of the new and existing intellectual property portfolios.
Different systems, processes, and people, coupled with potential
gaps in historical records, documentation, and knowledge, can
create obstructions to smooth integration. Whether a small or
large transaction, the post-closing activities ensure maximized
growth and benet from the new ownership of acquired technolo-
gies, intellectual property, and technological talent. Due diligence
at posttransaction closing assures the highest value of intellectual
property assets, attributes, and advantages. This chapter focuses
on postacquisition management of intellectual property port-
folios, and includes practice tips relating to people, ownership,
portfolio, data management, documentation and recordkeeping,
licensing, and brand management.
Chapter
Closing: What
HappensNext?
By Randi Karpinia
18
682 CHAPTER 18
II. Acquiring Intellectual Property Portfolios
You are an experienced and talented in-house intellectual prop-
erty attorney at a major corporation, and today is a good day.
Your patent application preparation backlog is large but manage-
able, with only a few bar date cases due in the next few months.
Your patent and trademark dockets are both under control. You
haven’t accrued any extensions of time this month. Your clients,
both technologists and business managers, are cooperative and
are cognizant of company processes. You’ve become a near expert
in the technologies within your assigned intellectual property
portfolio.
Then it happens. It could be a phone call, a knock at your
ofce door, or an email. No matter what the method, the mes-
sage is the same: your employer corporation just acquired a new
company, and you’ve been assigned to manage the integration
of the acquired intellectual property, including the patent, copy-
right, and trademark portfolios. Your well-controlled life is about
to be turned upside down. Using this chapter and the associated
appendices as a guideline, you can successfully manage the sur-
prises and challenges ahead.
III. Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Portfolios:
Understanding the Acquired Value
A. Ownership Verification
Typically, at the time of transaction close, the seller assigns,
transfers, conveys, and delivers all of its right, title, and interest
in and to the transferring intellectual property to the acquiring
party. It is therefore imperative to verify the right, title, and
interest of each acquired patent and trademark asset, preferably
prior to the close of the transaction. Ownership considerations
include missing assignments, incomplete chain of title, security
interests, litigation judgments, company buyouts, name changes,
ownership changes, and the like, and double conveyances
Patent, Trademark , and Copyright Portfolios: U nderstanding the Acquired Value 683
(whichcause the later conveyance to be moot). One caveat: In the
case of errors in an assignment, the intent of the parties controls,
making the error correctable. With so many potential unknowns,
it is imperative to coordinate with attorneys both within your
corporation and within the entity that previously managed the
acquired assets.
As intellectual property rights have become increasingly
valuable assets for many companies, it has become common for
commercial lenders to secure obligations of borrowers using as
collateral not only their tangible assets but also their intangible
intellectual property assets. In other words, the intellectual prop-
erty owner will pledge its patents, trademarks, and copyrights as
collateral for a bank loan. A security interest is not a present own-
ership interest; however, it is an interest superior to subsequent
assignment and security interests. The intellectual property
owner can still assign its rights, but until a formal release is exe-
cuted, any subsequent purchaser takes ownership subject to the
security interest. The interest holder may not systematically pro-
vide a release when the terms of the loan are met, leaving a lin-
gering defect on the title. Therefore, prior to acquiring intellectual
property assets, identify any such security interest agreements,
assume that the obligations of the security agreement have been
met, and request an executed release.
For proper title, there must be a complete chain of documents
from the original owner(s) (e.g., the inventors in the case of a
patent asset) to the present owner. Following the chain of own-
ership can be complicated. For example, one or more parties in
a chain of title may be dissolved or otherwise defunct, in which
case identication of the successors in interest would be required.
There may also be missing link(s) in the chain due to changes of
corporate entity such as a merger. When one company mergers
into another company, with only the latter surviving thereafter,
there is a change of ownership of the intellectual property. As the
acquiring owner, your company will need documentation identify-
ing this ownership change to establish a clean path to its owner-
ship. Another example of an unclear chain of title resultsfrom

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT