No. 34-4, October 2021

Index

• Are You Qualified? A Process to Certify Labor Arbitrators as Qualified
• Prosecutorial Discretion During a Pandemic: Implications for the Criminal Justice System and the Rule of Law
• Voting on The Spectrum: How Judges & Lawyers Can Encourage Enfranchisement & Accessibility for Voters with Autism Spectrum Disorder
• Machine Lawyering and Artificial Attorneys: Conflicts in Legal Ethics with Complex Computer Algorithms
• Foul Blows: Using the Ethical Standard to Prevent Low-Level Brady Violations from Slipping Through the Cracks
• The Pandemic of Intrusion into Privileged Communications between Incarcerated Clients and Their Attorneys
• The Ethics of Addiction and Legal Partnership Agreements: How Current Partnership Laws and the Rules of Professional Conduct Fail to Account for the Epidemic of Addiction in the Legal Profession
• A Path to More Sustainable Corporations in the United States
• Gig Lawyers in the U.S. Economy: Realizing the Potential of Platform Markets and Bolstering Ethical Duties to Affect Change and Innovation
• Bad Vice, Bad Advice: A Call to End Government Lawyers' Abdication of their Ethical Duty as Counselors
• The Statutory Monopoly for Public Performances of Musical Works: A Comprehensive Solution to the Consequences of Fractional Licensing
• Choice of Law in International Human Rights Fact-Finding Missions
• Non-Legal Advice: How Attorneys Counsel Clients on Investors' ESG Demands
• Eroding Voting Rights as a Threat to Judicial Independence and Impartiality
• Betwixt and Between: A Tax Lawyer's Dual Responsibility
• Regulating Restorative Justice: What Arbitration Teaches Us About Regulating the Restorative Process in Criminal Courts
• Zoom School of Law?
• A Patch with the Dev-il: How the Development of Autonomous Vehicle Software Will Challenge Attorney-Client Privilege
• The Roger Stone Affair: An Examination of the Legal, Normative, and Ethical Restraints on Presidential Interference in Prosecutorial Decisions
• When Judicial Deference Erodes Liberty: The Shortcomings of Stinson v. United States and its Implications on Judicial Ethics
• Serving at the Pleasure of the President: Justice Fortas's Failings as a Judge and the Continued Need for a Supreme Court Code of Ethics
• Defense Attorneys at a Dead End: Representing Stateless Terrorist Clients Detained Indefinitely
• The English Roots of American Legal Regulation: An Examination of Early Legal Regulation in Virginia, Massachusetts, and New York
• Limits on International Environmental Violations: How Antitrust Law May Be a Blueprint for Future Claims of Foreign Environmental Violations
• The Justice Gap: Confronting Complicity in the Legal Profession to Better Reimagine Reform
• Bioethical Considerations of Right to Try and What It Means for the Patient-Physician Relationship
• Glory-Old, New, and Changing: What Nationalism and the American Flag Can Teach Lawyers About Citizenship and Justice
• Diversifying the Federal Judiciary and Why It Matters
• Arbitrating 'Just Cause' for Employee Discipline and Discharge in the Era of Covid-19
• Ethical Issues in Employment Arbitration
• Opportunity Zones: Whose Opportunity? Remedying Failed Federal Policy via State Pro Bono Policy Toolkits
• Thinking Outside of the Box: Ethical Implications of the Unforeseen Backfire of Ban the Box Policies
• The Missing Link: How Prosecutors Contribute to the Carceral System and Why They Must be Included in the Abolition Movement
• Changing the Discretionary Nature of Appointing an Expressed Wishes Child's Attorney in D.C. Child Welfare Cases
• Regulation of Data Localization and How the Legal Profession Can Play a Role
• The Paper Chase: Fee-Splitting vs. Independent Judgment in Portfolio Litigation Financing of Commercial Litigation