Watch What You Say: Job Applicants’ Justice Perceptions From Initial Organizational Correspondence

AuthorTalya N. Bauer,H. Jack Walker,Catherine A. Helmuth,Hubert S. Feild
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21655
Date01 November 2015
Published date01 November 2015
Human Resource Management, November–December 2015, Vol. 54, No. 6. Pp. 999–1011
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
DOI:10.1002/hrm.21655
Correspondence to: H. Jack Walker, Auburn University, 415 Lowder Business Building, Auburn, AL 36849,
Phone: 334-844-6510, Fax: 334-844-5159, E-mail: Walkeh1@auburn.edu.
of the selection process (Shaw, Wild, & Colquitt,
2003; Truxillo, Bodner, Bertolino, Bauer, & Yonce,
2009). Specifically, organizations can improve
fairness perceptions, thus promoting positive
organizational views among job applicants, by
delivering specific information concerning selec-
tion process decisions in an interpersonally sensi-
tive manner (Bauer etal., 2001; Ployhart, Ryan, &
Bennett, 1999).
While the selection explanations’ litera-
ture has certainly advanced our understanding
of how recruiting organizations can proactively
influence job applicants’ reactions, we argue that
Scholars have consistently shown that
job applicants’ fairness perceptions re-
garding recruitment and selection pro-
cedures influence a variety of important
outcomes such as perceived organiza-
tional attractiveness (Bauer, Maertz, Dolen, &
Campion, 1998), applicant withdrawal behavior
(Schmit & Ryan, 1997), and applicant perfor-
mance on selection procedures, such as written
tests (Chan, 1997). One influential stream of re-
search focuses on how the explanations provided
by organizations to job applicants regarding selec-
tion decisions influence their fairness perceptions
WATCH WHAT YOU SAY: JOB
APPLICANTS’ JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS
FROM INITIAL ORGANIZATIONAL
CORRESPONDENCE
H. JACK WALKER, CATHERINE A. HELMUTH,
HUBERT S. FEILD, AND TALYA N. BAUER
Although it is a common practice for organizations to communicate with job
seekers following application submission, little is known about how applicants
react to this correspondence. Drawing from recruitment and organizational jus-
tice theories, we explore the possibility that specifi c correspondence content
infl uences job seekers’ fairness perceptions. Data collected from 119 actual job
applicants indicated that providing relevant information about the recruitment
process (information adequacy) positively related to informational and inter-
personal justice perceptions. However, delivering this information in an inter-
personally sensitive manner (information sensitivity) had a stronger impact
on interpersonal justice perceptions. Finally, post hoc analyses suggested that
incorporating specifi c content delivered in initial job applicant correspondence
could allow recruiting organizations to develop practical, cost-effective strate-
gies for enhancing job seekers’ fairness perceptions following their application
submission. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keyword: recruitment

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT