The role of knowledge creation modes in architectural innovation

Date01 January 2020
Published date01 January 2020
AuthorDavid Sarpong,Ala'a Azzam,Qile He
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2312
RESEARCH ARTICLE
The role of knowledge creation modes in architectural
innovation
Ala'a Azzam
1
| Qile He
1
| David Sarpong
2
1
Coventry Business School, Coventry
University, Coventry, United Kingdom
2
Brunel Business School, Brunel University,
Uxbridge, United Kingdom
Correspondence
Qile He, Coventry Business School, Coventry
University, Priory St, Coventry CV1 5FB,
United Kingdom.
Email: qile.he@coventry.ac.uk
Abstract
Knowledge creation modes (especially socialization and internalization) enhance
architectural innovation (AI) capability of U.K. manufacturing firms. AI is the
reconfiguration of product or process components and creating completely new
interfaces between them. Knowledge creation modes enhance firms' AI to create
new products while utilizing their architectural knowledge. Knowledge socialization
and internalization are the most important modes that affect AI. Socialization helps
to share tacit knowledge while internalization enables individuals to absorb and
embody accumulated know-how to envision new product ideas.
1|INTRODUCTION
In today's ever-changing environment, there is a need to respond to
external technological and market changes. This is particularly the
case in the manufacturing industry, where competition is very fierce
and customers' needs are changing. The proliferation of research that
investigate how organizations can survive in this environment was the
motivation behind this research, knowledge-processing capabilities
aim to renew firms' knowledge stock and allow firms to keep up to
date with technological and market changes. The ability to create and
manage knowledge is a prerequisite of innovation, as the process of
creating knowledge can leverage firms' resources and efforts into cre-
ative and novel outcomes (Chang, Hung, & Lin, 2014; Schulze &
Hoegl, 2008; Sujatha & Krishnaveni, 2018). Although innovation has
various prerequisites, the focus of this research is on knowledge crea-
tion. The research shows that knowledge-processing capabilities are
essential to create value and produce innovative outcomes (Chang
et al., 2014; Grant, 1996; Nonaka & Von Krogh, 2009).
The pressure to innovate has become pervasive in today's mar-
kets. Technological changes, customer demands, and revolutionary
technologies combine to place pressure on firms to constantly inno-
vate and provide cutting-edge outcomes. Developing innovative capa-
bilities (such as architectural innovation [AI] capability) enhances
firms' ability to respond to market demands by producing innovative
products and services and can has a profound impact on their
performance (Amabile, 1993; Henderson & Clark, 1990). This research
contributes to developing a framework of AI capability to optimize
performance in a rapidly changing environment.
AI is increasingly highlighted as an important driver of new prod-
uct development (NPD; Baldwin & Clark, 2006; Grunwald & Kieser,
2007; Henderson & Clark, 1990). AI is defined as rearranging the way
components are linked together while leaving the core design con-
cepts (and the basic knowledge underlying the components)
untouched (Henderson & Clark, 1990). It is the reconfiguration of
product or process components and creating completely new inter-
faces between them. AI enables the creation of new markets or
reforming existing market and may allow new entrants to make
inroads into newly developed industries. Since AI usually prevails at
the early stage of technological change and industry evolution,
researchers believe that AI can affect companies' survival and perfor-
mance (Baldwin & Clark, 2006). Hence, researchers are interested in
examining the performance enhancement that can be achieved by
exploiting AIs (Bozdogan, Deyst, Hoult, & Lucas, 1998; Galunic &
Eisenhardt, 2001; Henderson & Clark, 1990).
AIs depend on the innovator's superior architectural knowledge,
which is defined as the knowledge about the entities of a system and
how they are related.(Baldwin & Clark, 2006). According to Baldwin
and Clark (2006:5) architectural knowledge comprises knowledge of
(a) how the system performs its functions (the function to component
mapping); (b) how the components are linked together (the interfaces
between components); and (c) the behavior of the system, both
planned and unplanned, in different environments. However,
JEL classification codes: D83, O30.
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2312
Strategic Change. 2020;29:7787. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jsc © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 77

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT