The applicability of Porter's generic strategies in pure online firms: A case study approach

AuthorSaffa Firoz Suleman,Marwa Firoz Suleman,Mona Rashidirad
Date01 May 2019
Published date01 May 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2258
RESEARCH ARTICLE
The applicability of Porter's generic strategies in pure online
firms: A case study approach
*
Marwa Firoz Suleman
1
| Mona Rashidirad
2
| Saffa Firoz Suleman
1
1
Sunny Safaris Ltd., Arusha, Tanzania
2
Brighton Business School, University of
Brighton, Brighton, United Kingdom
Correspondence
Mona Rashidirad, Brighton Business School,
Mithras House, University of Brighton, Lewes
Road, Brighton BN24AT, United Kingdom
Email: M.Rashidirad@Brighton.ac.uk
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to investigate the usability and applicability of Porter's
generic strategies in the current e-business environment. In this paper, a review of
Porter's generic strategies was conducted to recognise the limitations and weak-
nesses of the model, which prevent its effective application in the e-business envi-
ronment. To do so, a case study approach on three pure online firms, e.g., Amazon,
e-bay and Google was employed. The findings acknowledged the application of Por-
ter's generic strategies to pure online firms in order to achieve competitive advantage
and proved the positive impact of generic strategies on firms' performance. The paper
suggests that although cost leadership strategy is able to generate greater perfor-
mance, pursuing a differentiation strategy can be more worthwhile and sustainable for
pure online firms compared to cost leadership strategy. This research contributes to
existing research by suggesting Porter's generic strategies as a valid and viable model
for pure online firms whichoperate in the current e-business environment.
1|INTRODUCTION
The extent to which e-businesses have been effective in cutting costs,
speeding up the pace of innovation (Zhu, Kraemer, & Xu, 2006),
increasing productivity (Scott & Walter, 2003), flexibility, and their
responsiveness to emerging markets and customers' needs
(Gunasekaran & Ngai, 2005) is undeniable (see also Bharadwaj, El
Sawy, Pavlou, & Venkatraman, 2013; Ramanathan, Ramanathan, &
Hsiao, 2012). Taking this dynamism into account, and with respect to
the increasing level of competition among firms, and the extent to
which customers are using the Internet to make purchases (Liu, Xiao,
Lim, & Tan, 2017), the majority of firms have been forced to adapt
their e-business strategies (Bi, Davison, & Smyrnios, 2017). Previous
research has confirmed that e-business has a positive impact on firm
performance. For example, Karagozoglu and Lindell (2004) found that
e-business leads to higher sales. Similarly, Straub and Klein (2001)
identified that e-business reduces operational costs, increases produc-
tivity, and improves efficiency.
The extant literature (e.g., Rashidirad, Salimian, Soltani, & Fazeli,
2017) shows that an e-business without a clear competitive strategy
is very unlikely to outperform; so in order to succeed in the increas-
ingly competitive environment of e-business, firms would need to
carefully develop and implement successful competitive strategies.
Porter (1980) asserts that in order for firms to compete successfully
and achieve above-average profit, they need to choose one of the
three strategic positions of cost leadership, differentiation, and focus.
Although there are numerous studies suggesting the positive impact
of generic strategies on firm performance (Allen & Helms, 2006;
Banker, Mashruwala, & Tripathy, 2014; Dess & Davis, 1984; Kinyuira,
2014; Powers & Hahn, 2004), research into e-business context is still
spare. As e-business has dispersed progressively among firms, it is
vital to understand how generic strategies affect firms' performance.
According to Porter and Miller (1985), information technology (IT) can
be applied to assist firms to adopt and implement generic strategies.
Similarly, Kim, Nam, and Stimpert (2004) stated that the incorporation
of the Internet into firms' overall strategy is necessary if firms are to
exploit the advantages of e-business. This is particularly crucial to
large multinational e-businesses due to their size, complex value chain,
*JEL classification codes: L10, L21.
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2258
Strategic Change. 2019;28:167176. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jsc © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 167

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT