Subcultural tensions in managing organisational culture: a study of an English Premier League football organisation

AuthorEmmanuel Ogbonna,Lloyd C. Harris
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12059
Date01 April 2015
Published date01 April 2015
Subcultural tensions in managing organisational
culture: a study of an English Premier League
football organisation
Emmanuel Ogbonna, Cardiff University Business School
Lloyd C. Harris, Warwick Business School
Human Resource Management Journal, Vol 25, no 2, 2015, pages 217–232
In this article, we explore subcultural interaction in the context of attempts by executives to control
culture in the unusual organisational setting of football. We present evidence of five tension points in
subcultural relations (togetherness or isolation, internal labour market, multiple identification and
allegiances, individual and organisational requirements, and competition and cooperation). We examine
how these tensions were induced and or exacerbated by the culture management efforts, as well as the
ways in which the dynamics of change impacted on the objectives of executives. The article concludes
with a discussion of the implications of the findings for theory and practice.
Contact: Dr Emmanuel Ogbonna, Department of Management, Employment and Organization,
Cardiff University Business School, Colum Drive, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK. Email: Ogbonna@
cardiff.ac.uk
Keywords: managing organisational culture; organisational subculture; culture control; cultural
change; subcultural tensions
INTRODUCTION
It is remarkable that despite the extensive and long-standing criticisms of the idea that
organisational culture is susceptible to conscious management manipulation (see Krefting
and Frost, 1985; Legge, 1994), the issue of planned culture change (‘culture control’) has
continued to drive the popularity of the culture construct. Indeed, it appears that the recent
celebration of the demise of what has been referred to as ‘corporate culturism’ by some scholars
(e.g. Fleming, 2013) is somewhat premature given the evidence that indicates that planned
culture change remains one of the most important initiatives in which executives engage (see
Bremer, 2012; Hill, 2013). A further indication of the perceived relevance and continuing
popularity of culture and culture control can be seen in the number of high-profile
organisations such as the National Health Service (see Employee Outlook, 2013) and General
Motors (see Krisher, 2012), which have recently identified ‘inappropriate culture’ as the source
of their problems. In this regard, while external evaluation of university research strongly
emphasises the importance of ‘impact’, the divergence in what practitioners and academics
consider ‘important’ and ‘valuable’ in this area is interesting.
While there is a notable gap between practice and current theoretical interest, such academic
hubris is partly explained by narrow conceptual foci. For example, most studies of culture
change have either focused on investigations of change initiatives to uncover whether and what
level of change has occurred (see Grugulis et al., 2000; Ogbonna and Wilkinson, 2003) or are
aimed at presenting conceptual critiques of the culture management approach (e.g. Fleming,
2013). Similarly, although culture researchers have long argued that organisations comprise
multiple rather than unitary cultures (see Alvesson, 2002; Meyerson and Martin, 1987), there
bs_bs_banner
doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12059
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, VOL 25 NO 2, 2015 217
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Please cite this article in press as: Ogbonna, E. and Harris, L.C. (2015) ‘Subcultural tensions in managing organisational culture: a study of an
English Premier League football organisation’. Human Resource Management Journal 25: 2, 217–232.
remains a shortage of empirical research into inter and intra subcultural interaction
especially in the context of planned cultural change (see also Lok et al., 2005, Morgan and
Ogbonna, 2008).
We contribute to empirical and theoretical knowledge through explicating the tensions that
emerge in culture control practices in an unusual organisational setting, and we elucidate the
implications of these for the management of culture and human resources in other
organisational contexts. Specifically, we examine how inter- and intra-subcultural dynamics are
impacted by the efforts of executives to control organisational culture through planned change.
We explore the tension points that are induced and/or exacerbated by the change efforts, and
we elucidate the power interplays within and between subcultures (especially in relation to the
interactions between individuals and groups perceived to be central to organisational activities
and those that were on the periphery).
We locate our study of subcultural interaction in the context of a football organisation for a
variety of reasons. Firstly, although football clubs are important parts of the social fabric of
many societies, there are surprisingly few studies of management (especially human resource
management) in such contexts. Secondly, football represents a good site for this study in that
the idiosyncratic nature of football business, including entrenchment of values, emotional
attachment and connection, multiplicity of interests, diversity of stakeholders and fluidity of
operations distinguish football clubs from conventional organisations on which much culture
research is based and these pose interesting challenges for cultural analyses. Moreover, as we
shall see later, while there is distinctiveness in elements of these features, there are interesting
parallels between the football context and those of other organisational types. For example,
while football is renowned for promoting specific star employees (players) who are given
enhanced status and preferential contractual terms relative to other employees (see Dobson and
Goddard, 2011; Szymanski, 2010), there is an increasingly popular organisational literature that
explores various ramifications of such differential treatment through, for example, talent
management (see Gelens et al., 2013; Van den Brink et al., 2013). Similarly, the issue of power
relations within and between internal and external groups is well documented in football
including studies of the links between fans and their clubs (see Harris and Ogbonna, 2008) and
research into the relationship between players and the clubs they represent (see Szymanski,
2010). Parallels exist with traditional organisations in studies that investigate the political and
cultural influences inherent in organising and managing individuals and groups in
organisations (e.g. Hallett, 2003; Moldaschl and Fischer, 2004). Our study of the football context
will explore these parallels and provide interesting contrasts that will help in shedding
additional light on these important debates.
CULTURE CHANGE, CONTROL AND SUBCULTURES
Schein (1996) argued that organisational culture is the ‘missing concept’ in management and
organisational analysis. This position can, on first reading, be seen as contradictory in that
culture has been one of the most widely researched concepts in contemporary organisational
theory and practice. However, Schein’s contention is best understood as testament to the
ubiquity and opacity of culture; for the more we seem to learn about culture, the more we
uncover hidden dimensions that speak to our incomplete knowledge (see Ogbonna and
Wilkinson, 2003). Although there remains significant confusion surrounding various aspects of
organisational culture, it is not the aim of this review to explore these issues. Instead, the aim
is to highlight the value and perspicacity of the subcultural approach in understanding the
dynamics of planned organisational culture change. To this end, the definition of culture in this
Subcultural tensions in managing organisational culture
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, VOL 25 NO 2, 2015218
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT