Statutory union recognition in the UK: a work in progress

Published date01 January 2012
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2338.2011.00661.x
Date01 January 2012
AuthorTor Brodtkorb
Statutory union recognition in the UK:
a work in progress
Tor Brodtkorb
ABSTRACTirj_66170..84
The 1999 scheme for statutory union recognition has been criticised for being too
complex, and for leaving important matters unclear, for doing too little for workers
and unions and for requiring too much from employers. The similarity to the US
system has also been criticised. There were fears that attempts to achieve statutory
union recognition would redirect the energy of trade unions in the UK to fruitless
limbs, forcing unions and employers into antagonistic litigation. Although some of
these criticisms are tenable, legislation seldom satisfies all parties affected by it, and all
new legislation is haunted by the spectre of unintended consequences. Nevertheless,
the system of statutory union recognition adopted in the UK strikes a reasonable
balance between the interests of the rival parties and appears to function efficiently
and, for the most part, fairly.
1 INTRODUCTION
The Employment Relations Act (ERA) 1999 enacted into UK labour law a system of
statutory trade union recognition under which a union can compel an employer to
recognise and bargain with it. The goals of the government in passing the legislation
were to create a workable system whereby employers may be compelled to recognise
unions with a majority of support in a relevant workforce, while at the same time, to
encourage unions and employers to negotiate voluntary agreements outside of the
statutory procedure. The possibility of a union attaining statutory recognition is
intended to operate in the background of employer–union relations, persuading
reluctant employers to retain control of their relationships with unions by negotiating
voluntary recognition in order to forestall mandatory statutory union recognition.
The statutory procedure is an attempt to have the best of both worlds: preserving the
voluntarist and cooperative tradition of British workplace representation while
adopting the feature of US labour law that allows a representative union to compel an
employer to negotiate.
This scheme for statutory union recognition set out in the Employment Relations
Act 1999 has been criticised for being too detailed and complex, and for leaving
Tor Brodtkorb is an Assistant Professor of Business Law and Ethics in the School of Business and
Management, American University of Sharjah. Correspondence should be addressed to Tor Brodtkorb,
School of Business and Management, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah 26666, United Arab
Emirates; email: tbrodtkorb@aus.edu
Industrial Relations Journal 43:1, 70–84
ISSN 0019-8692
© 2012 The Author(s)
Industrial Relations Journal © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and
350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT