Propelling diverse leaders to the top: A developmental network approach
Published date | 01 January 2018 |
Date | 01 January 2018 |
Author | Dawn E. Chanland,Wendy Marcinkus Murphy |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21842 |
HR SCIENCE FORUM
Propelling diverse leaders to the top: A developmental
network approach
Dawn E. Chanland
1
| Wendy Marcinkus Murphy
2
1
Queens University of Charlotte, Charlotte,
North, Carolina
2
Babson College, Massachusetts
Correspondence
Dawn E. Chanland, Associate Professor of
Management, Queens University of Charlotte,
1900 Selwyn Avenue, Charlotte, NC 28274,
Ph: 805-305-9765.
Email: chandlerd@queens.edu
Scholars and practitioners are making a strong business case for greater representation of
women and other underrepresented groups on senior management teams and boards. A model
is developed that highlights how to create optimal developmental networks—groups of devel-
opers who help advance people’s careers and personal growth—that can assist in propelling
diverse leaders into the upper echelons of their organizations and board positions. Several liter-
ature streams are integrated in order to identify developmental networks that will help diverse
leaders overcome barriers to breaking the glass ceiling in greater numbers. Numerous strategies
intended to shape diverse leaders’network structure and content are discussed, as are contex-
tual challenges that may inhibit optimal networks’development. Lastly, theoretical and practical
implications for individuals and organizations are highlighted.
KEYWORDS
developmental networks, diversity, leadership development, mentoring, women
1|INTRODUCTION
A new study of 366 public companies in the U.S.,
Canada, U.K., Brazil, Mexico and Chile by McKinsey &
Co., a major management consultancy, found a statis-
tically significant relationship between companies
with women and minorities in their upper ranks and
better financial performance as measured by earnings
before interest and tax, or EBIT.
And “very few U.S. companies yet have a systematic
approach to diversity that is able to consistently
achieve a diverse global talent pool,”Ms. Hunt added.
(Lublin, 2015)
This article introduces a conceptual model integrating evidence
from several literatures and offers a framework for human resources
practitioners to leverage in their quest to propel women and other
underrepresented groups (whom we collectively refer to as diverse
leaders throughout) into the top management ranks of their organiza-
tions and into board positions. The model centers on the role of
optimal developmental networks needed by diverse leaders (i.e., high-
potential women and non-White leaders who are in the individual
contributor and lower- to middle-level management ranks who have
the capability to ascend to executive positions) as critical for career
ascension. Prior to this article, no mentoring research has proposed
optimal developmental network structure and content characteristics
needed for diverse leaders’advancement and linked the provision of
network support over time to positive diverse leader outcomes; this
model intends to fill that theoretical gap in the literature. The model
also asserts the critical role that human resources can play in creating
strategies that help diverse leaders to nurture optimal networks, thus
offering substantive practical implications for organizations.
Research on the performance of companies with more women in
senior management and on their boards and with more minorities in
upper echelon roles strongly supports the business case for diversity
in upper management (Carter, Joy, Wagner, & Narayanan, 2007; Cur-
tis, Schmid, & Struber, 2012; Krishnan & Park, 2005; Lublin, 2015;
Nielsen & Nielsen, 2013; Noland, Moran, Kotschwar, 2016). For
example, a 2012 study noted, “We find that, ceteris paribus, a given
firm generates on average 1% (or over $40 million) more economic
value with at least one woman on its top management team than
without any women on its top management team and also enjoys
superior accounting performance”(Dezso & Ross, 2012, p. 1084).
Studies also show that more diverse organizations are more innova-
tive (Hewlett, Marshall, & Sherbin, 2013; Ostergaard, Timmermans, &
Kristinsson, 2011; Talke, Salomo, & Rost, 2010).
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21842
Hum Resour Manage. 2018;57:111–126. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/hrm © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 111
Prior to the recognition of a “diversity dividend”for companies’
performance, the argument for propelling diverse leaders to senior
ranking positions and to corporate boards rested largely on social and
ethical arguments (Curtis et al., 2014). As research proliferates that
finds positive implications for more diverse representation at the top,
it becomes clear that human resources professionals have a signifi-
cant role to play in growing diverse talent and aiding their hierarchical
advancement. Complicating the achievement of more diverse repre-
sentation at the top, substantial research has identified unique chal-
lenges faced by diverse leaders in their efforts to reach the upper
echelons in organizations (e.g., Catalyst, 2007; Devillard, Graven,
Lawson, Paradise, & Sancier-Sultan, 2014; Hewlett, Peraino, Sher-
bin, & Sumberg, 2010; Ibarra, 1992, 1993). Within corporations, this
challenge shows up as increasingly difficult odds of advancement for
women compared to men, with women being five times less likely to
reach CEO from the executive committee level (Devillard et al.,
2014). African American, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and Hispanic/Latino
representation at the CEO level is dismal, just over 4% (Zillman,
2014). Similarly, these minority groups collectively hold 13% of all
corporate board seats (Alliance for Board Diversity, 2013). Two pri-
mary factors, one structural (e.g., lack of access to informal networks)
and the other perceptual (e.g., evaluation against the White male
leadership standard), are considered to be the primary culprits of
diverse leader underrepresentation (Ibarra, 1997; Ibarra, Ely, & Kolb,
2013; McPherson, Smith-Lovin, & Cook, 2001; Whitely, Dougherty, &
Dreher, 1991). These challenges result in particularistic developmen-
tal needs on the part of diverse leaders that must be met for
advancement to occur.
Here, we propose that mentors and other devel opers that com-
prise a diverse leader’s developmental net work—the group of people
who take an active interest in and act ion to advance focal indivi-
duals’careers and personal growth (Higgins & Kram, 20 01)
2
—can
provide an array of career support (e.g. , sponsorship, visibility,
coaching, challenging assignments, role modeling) and psychosocial
support functions (e.g., affirmation an d confirmation, friendship,
counseling, inspiration and motivation ) (Cotton, Shen, & Livne-Taran-
dach, 2011; Kram, 1985; Murphy & Kram, 2010), as we ll as holding
behaviors (e.g., containment, empathet ic acknowledgment, enabling
perspective) (Ghosh, Haynes & Kram, 2013; Kahn, 2001; Rag ins, Ehr-
hardt, Lyness, Murphy, & Capman, 2017) that can offset and miti-
gate the challenges that often prevent them from reaching the
C-suite and boards.
Our framework, which draws upon and integrates theoretical and
empirical contributions across several literatures, including but not
limited to research on women’s leadership (Catalyst, 2007; Ibarra
et al., 2013), diversity (e.g., Ibarra, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1997), mini–
learning career cycles (Hall, 2002), holding environments at work
(Kahn, 2001), positive organizational scholarship (Dutton & Heaphy,
2003; Dutton & Ragins, 2006), and mentoring and developmental
networks (e.g., Dobrow, Chandler, Murphy, & Kram, 2012; Higgins &
Kram, 2001), provides scientific support and practical guidance for a
programmatic and organization-wide effort to propel diverse leaders
to upper echelons in organizations.
The model proposed here (see Figure 1) shows that human
resources strategies aimed at (a) creating a developmental culture
that helps cultivate high-quality developmental relationships
(Dutton & Heaphy, 2003; Ragins, 2011), (b) providing access to
needed developers, (c) training on developmental networks, and
(d) heightening developmental initiation, can shape the structure and
content of diverse leaders’developmental networks as they learn and
grow during the career transitions (mini–learning cycles) necessary to
contribute at a top-management team level and on corporate boards.
Strategies taken by HR can enable an evolving person–network fit
between the unique needs diverse leaders have due to the structural
and perceptual challenges they face vis-à-vis their White male coun-
terparts and their network characteristics (structure and content).
The psychosocial, career, and holding behavior support provided by
developers enables them to meet diverse leaders’particular needs
over time as they ascend in organizations.
We proceed by introducing developmental networks as vehicles
for career ascension. Next, we propose characteristics of optimal
developmental networks for diverse leaders that center on the fit
between diverse leaders’needs and network characteristics (structure
and content) in light of structural and perceptual barriers facing them
over time. Importantly, we highlight the need for developers’provi-
sion of holding behaviors that buffer diverse leaders from common
anxiety-producing challenges. We then delineate specific actions that
HR practitioners can take to propel diverse leaders to the upper
echelons of management.
2|DEVELOPMENTAL NETWORKS AS
VEHICLES FOR CAREER ASCENSION
Over the past 30 years, a significant amount of support has amassed
for mentoring as a vehicle for individual growth and career advance-
ment (e.g., Chandler, Kram, & Yip, 2011; Kammeyer-Mueller & Judge,
2008; Ragins & Kram, 2007). Support from mentors and other devel-
opers that comprise individuals’developmental networks has been
associated with numerous positive outcomes for protégés, including
heightened compensation and promotions (Seibert, Kraimer & Liden,
2001), personal learning (Lankau & Scandura, 2002), performance
(Yip, 2015), and work satisfaction (Higgins, 2000). Conversely,
research has found that a dearth of mentoring prevents women from
securing seats on multiple corporate boards (McDonald & Westphal,
2013). Commonly identified developers include, but are not limited
to, a person’s spouse and other family members, supervisors, senior-
ranking professionals, peers at work, external executive coaches,
friends outside of work, current and former school colleagues, indus-
try or professional association colleagues, mentoring groups, and jun-
ior employees who can act in a reverse mentoring capacity
(Murphy & Kram, 2010, 2014; Shen, Cotton, & Kram, 2015).
While certain network structures are associated with positive
career outcomes—for example, promotions, extraordinary career
achievement, performance, and optimism (Cotton et al., 2011; Hig-
gins & Thomas, 2001; Yip, 2015)—the ideal network for any one per-
son is contingent upon achieving a fit between his or her
developmental needs and developmental network structure and con-
tent; researchers have referred to this notion as “person–network fit”
(e.g., Higgins, 2007; Shen, 2010; Shen, et al., 2015). Given the
112 CHANLAND AND MURPHY
To continue reading
Request your trial