Performance‐based rewards and innovative behaviors

AuthorXiaobei Li,Sut I. Wong,Ricardo Rodrigues,Rita Cunha,Karin Sanders,Helen Shipton,Anders Dysvik,Frances Jorgensen,Yvonne Van Rossenberg
Published date01 November 2018
Date01 November 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21918
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Performance-based rewards and innovative behaviors
Karin Sanders
1
| Frances Jorgensen
2
| Helen Shipton
3
| Yvonne Van Rossenberg
4
|
Rita Cunha
5
| Xiaobei Li
6
| Ricardo Rodrigues
7
| Sut I. Wong
8
| Anders Dysvik
9
1
School of Management, UNSW Business
School, Sydney, Australia
2
Faculty of Management, Royal Roads
University, Vancouver, Canada
3
Nottingham Business School, Nottingham
Trent University, Nottingham, UK
4
SHRM at the Institute for Management
Research, Nijmegen School of Management,
Radboud University, Nijmegen, the
Netherlands
5
Nova School of Business and Economics,
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
6
Graduate School of China, Sungkyunkwan
University, Seoul, South Korea
7
King's College London, London, UK
8
Department of Communication and Culture,
BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway
9
Department of Leadership and Organizational
Behaviour, BI Norwegian Business School,
Oslo, Norway
Correspondence
Xiaobei Li, GSC Office, International Building,
25-2, Sungkyunkwan-Ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul
03063, South Korea.
Email: xiaobeili99@163.com
This study investigates the effects of two internal factors, performance-based rewards and
employee perceptions of human resource (HR) strength, and one external factor, country-level
uncertainty avoidance, on employee innovative behaviors. Drawing on situational strength the-
ory, we first hypothesize performance-based rewards will positively relate to innovative behav-
iors, and second, this relationship is stronger when employees understand the wider Human
Resource Management (HRM) system as intended by management, referred to as HR strength.
Finally, we assess the effect of uncertainty avoidance on the relationship between
performance-based rewards and innovative behaviors. Three-level data from 1,598 employees
and 186 managers in 29 organizations across 10 countries showed both employee perceptions
of HR strength and uncertainty avoidance of a country that differentially influence the relation-
ship between performance-based rewards and innovative behaviors. However, a significant rela-
tionship between performance-based rewards and innovative behaviors was not found. This
study offers novel insights into how organizations can use internal factors in a systematic man-
ner to promote innovative behaviors in their workplace, and highlights the limitations of sustain-
ing innovative behaviors in countries characterized by high levels of uncertainty avoidance.
KEYWORDS
HR strength, innovative behavior, performance-based rewards, uncertainty avoidance
1|INTRODUCTION
Employee innovative behaviors are recognized as a major contributor
to organizational innovation, leveraging the propensity of firms to sur-
vive in dynamic and challenging contexts (Shalley, Gilson, & Blum,
2009). Innovative behaviors manifest not only as a propensity to gen-
erate and implement new and creative ideas (De Jong & Den Hartog,
2010; Janssen, 2000; Scott & Bruce, 1994) but also to evaluate their
feasibility. Given the importance of innovative behavior for organiza-
tions, practitioners and scholars try to answer the question how to
enhance this way of working. However, we are still at an early stage
of understanding the role that human resource management (HRM)
(Sanders & Lin, 2015; Shipton, Sanders, Bednall, Lin, & Escriba-Carda,
2016) might play in fostering innovative behaviors, especially given
the multilevel dynamics that innovation entails (Gupta, Tesluk, & Tay-
lor, 2007; Shipton, Sparrow, Budhwar, & Brown, 2017). Hence,
research in this area is important and timely.
In this study, we draw on situational strength theory (Meyer,
Dalal, & Hermida, 2010; Mischel, 1968), which provides a powerful
theoretical lens for understanding what factors evoke innovative
behavior, to investigate relationships between financial and nonfinan-
cial performance-based rewards, employee perceptions of HR
strength, and the uncertainty avoidance of the country within which
an organization operates. Situational strength theory comprises four
underlying facets: consequences,clarity,constraints, and consistency
(Meyer et al., 2010). We argue financial and nonfinancial
performance-based rewards signal the consequences that will occur
where innovative behaviors are exhibited. In addition, we also con-
sider how employee perceptions of HR strength defined as the degree
to which employees understand HRM as intended by management
These authors contributed equally to this article.
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21918
Hum Resour Manage. 2018;57:14551468. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/hrm © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 1455

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT