Not Just for 'Consumers': Promotional Statements B2B

Pages189-202
189
CHAPTER X
NOT JUST FOR “CONSUMERS”:
PROMOTIONALSTATEMENTS B2B
Competitor false advertising remedies under the Lanham Act apply
equally to “business-to-business” communications and traditional
“consumer” advertising. A common misconceptionis that Lanham Act
false advertising cases are limited to “classic” advertising campaigns that
have widespread distribution to the general public. Reinforcing the
misconception, many of the better known Lanham Act false advertising
cases feature consumerproducts, such as mouthwash,1chicken,2
sweeteners,3infant formula,4and diaper pails.5Yet there is a different,
but equally important species of Lanham Act cases about promotional
statements that the consuming public never sees: promotions to
businesses.
Business to business (B2B) promotional statements arise in a variety
of contexts, such as when a company sells raw material to a downstream
manufacturer or when a company negotiates product placement on the
shelves of national retailers. Such statements are often made verbally or
in slides and e-mails rather than on billboards and television
commercials. Although statements in business settings are not made to
the general public, they are covered by the Lanham Act’s prohibition
against misleading promotional statements of fact.
Cases in the B2B setting have been sporadic and isolated, and
commentators and jurists have not previously recognized or discussed
these cases as a unique genre of Lanham Act cases. As illustrated by a
pair of New York cases from 2011 involving rodenticides (Reckitt
Benckiser, Inc. v. Motomco Ltd.)6and ingredients for nutritional
1. McNeil-PPC, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc., 351 F. Supp. 2d 226 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).
2. Sanderson Farms, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 547 F. Supp. 2d 491 (D. Md.
2008).
3. Merisant Co. v. McNeil Nutritionals, LLC, 515 F. Supp. 2d509 (E.D. Pa.
2007).
4. PBM Prods. v. M ead Johnson & Co., 639 F.3d 111 (4th Cir. 2011).
5. Munchkin, Inc. v. Playtex Prods., 2011 WL 2174383 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 11,
2011).
6. 760 F. Supp. 2d 446, 450 (S.D.N.Y. 2011).

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT