Experiencing meaningfulness climate in teams: How spiritual leadership enhances team effectiveness when facing uncertain tasks

Date01 March 2019
AuthorXiaoyu Huang,Lusi Wu,Fu Yang
Published date01 March 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21943
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Experiencing meaningfulness climate in teams: How spiritual
leadership enhances team effectiveness when facing uncertain
tasks
Fu Yang
1
| Xiaoyu Huang
2
| Lusi Wu
3
1
School of Business Administration,
Southwestern University of Finance and
Economics, Chengdu, China
2
College of Business and Public
Administration, California State University San
Bernardino, San Bernardino, California
3
School of Management and Economics,
University of Electronic Science and
Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Correspondence
Lusi Wu, University of Electronic Science and
Technology of China, School of Management
and Economics, Xiyuan Road 2006, Gaoxin
District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Email: susanwu.lusi1990@gmail.com
Funding information
National Natural Science Foundation of China,
Grant/Award Number: 71502141
This study integrates social information processing theory with leadership and climate literature,
and aims to produce novel theoretical insights into whether and how spiritual leadership and
task uncertainty foster conditions to enhance meaningfulness climate and subsequent team
effectiveness in China. Team effectiveness was operationalized as team performance and team
organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Based on data collected at three time points over
12 months from multiple sources of 123 teams in China, we found that spiritual leadership was
positively related to team performance and team OCB through meaningfulness climate. Further,
the relationship between spiritual leadership and meaningfulness climate was stronger for teams
with high task uncertainty than teams with low task uncertainty.
KEYWORDS
China, meaningfulness climate, spiritual leadership, task uncertainty, team effectiveness
1|INTRODUCTION
As people spend most of their waking hours at work, work lays the
primary foundation for identity, purpose, and belongingness
(Michaelson, Pratt, Grant, & Dunn, 2014). Meaningful work has been
identified as the most important feature that individuals seek in a job
(Cascio, 2003; Michaelson et al., 2014). When employees feel what
they are doing at work is meaningful, they tend to find their job signif-
icant, valuable, and interesting (Hackman & Oldham, 1976). By con-
trast, when employees find their work meaningless, they will think of
their job as trivial, worthless, and boring. This difference helps to
understand why some employees show high engagement at work,
whereas others are not able to be fully engaged at work. Research
demonstrates that work meaningfulness is beneficial to both
employees and organizations. For example, meaningfulness has been
associated with increased work engagement (e.g., Chen, Zhang, &
Vogel, 2011; May, Gilson, & Harter, 2004; Soane et al., 2013), job sat-
isfaction (e.g., Sparks & Schenk, 2001), well-being (e.g., Campbell,
Converse, & Rodgers, 1976), and reduced stress (e.g., Elangovan, Pin-
der, & McLean, 2010).
Despite the increasing breadth of work meaningfulness literature,
there is little research on work meaningfulness in work teams. Extant
research has largely ignored the antecedents and the outcomes of col-
lective and shared perceptions regarding work meaningfulness among
team members. However, as team becomes the fundamental unit in
job accomplishments, whether members perceive their team projects
or work as meaningful and purposeful can affect their team behaviors.
Our objective is thus to expand work meaningfulness literature by
exploring the presence and impact of shared perceptions held by team
members on work meaningfulness. We call these shared perceptions
meaningfulness climate, defined as the shared perceptions among team
members of the extent to which their work is significant, valuable, and
interesting.
Prior literature has demonstrated the importance of leaders in
shaping team climate (Dragoni, 2005). Here, we focus on spiritual
leadership and investigate its role in developing meaningfulness cli-
mate, as it enhances employeesbeliefs that they are working intrinsi-
cally for the right thing (Reave, 2005). Spiritual leadership refers to
the values, attitudes, and behaviors that one must adopt in intrinsi-
cally motivating ones self and others so that both have a positive
increase in the sense of spiritual well-being through calling and
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21943
Hum Resour Manage. 2019;58:155168. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/hrm © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 155

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT