Exercise as a Means of Reducing Perceptions of Work‐Family Conflict: A Test of the Roles of Self‐Efficacy and Psychological Strain

AuthorChristopher H. Thomas,Russell W. Clayton,Doan E. Winkel,Barjinder Singh
Date01 November 2015
Published date01 November 2015
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21611
Human Resource Management, November–December 2015, Vol. 54, No. 6. Pp. 1013–1035
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
DOI:10.1002/hrm.21611
Correspondence to: Russell W. Clayton, Donald R. Tapia School of Business, Saint Leo University,
UniversityCampus—MC 2011, P.O. Box 6665, Saint Leo, FL 33574-6665, Phone: (352) 588-7228,
Fax: (352) 588-8921, E-mail: russell.clayton@saintleo.edu.
EXERCISE AS A MEANS
OF REDUCING PERCEPTIONS
OF WORK-FAMILY CONFLICT:
A TEST OF THE ROLES OF SELF-
EFFICACY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL
STRAIN
RUSSELL W. CLAYTON, CHRISTOPHER H. THOMAS,
BARJINDER SINGH, AND DOAN E. WINKEL
Prior research suggests that exercise has positive benefi ts for individuals and
the organizations they work for. Using the literature related to social cogni-
tive theory and exercise, the present study hypothesizes and tests the effects
of exercise on two directions of work-family confl ict: work interference with
family (WIF) and family interference with work (FIW). Using a sample of 476
working adults, we found that exercise was both positively related to self-
effi cacy for managing work-family confl ict and negatively related to reported
psychological strain, which in turn were related to reductions in work-family
confl ict. Model fi t for the data support our contention that exercise indirectly
infl uences work-family confl ict via its direct impact on increased self-effi cacy
and reduced psychological strain. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: work-family confl ict, exercise, self-effi cacy, psychological strain
Introduction
Research on exercise abounds in
several disciplines (e.g., health,
psychology), with the general con-
sensus being that regular physical
activity is important to human
health (Fox, 2000). Both practitioner and aca-
demic publications in organizational studies
have also included exercise as a research vari-
able (e.g., Loehr & Schwartz, 2001; Neck &
Cooper, 2000). For instance, research has
shown that leaders who are physically fit
have increased stamina and mental focus
when compared to their less fit counterparts
(Leiter & Maslach, 2005; Neck & Cooper,
2000). Another study showed that small busi-
ness owners who jogged and/or lifted weights
1014 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, NOVEMBER–DECEMBER 2015
Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm
In spite of the
current research
on the effects
of exercise on
employees and
organizations,
there is a paucity
of research on how
exercise may impact
an individual’s
work-family balance
beliefs and abilities.
interfering-with-work (FIW) (Frone,
2003). One study (American Psychological
Association, 2007) suggests that just over
half of employees experience WIF and 43
percent experience FIW. Both directions of
work-family conflict have been shown to be
related to work-related and family-related
outcomes such as decreased job satisfaction
(e.g., Allen, Herst, Bruck, & Sutton, 2000),
decreased family satisfaction (e.g., Cardenas,
Major, & Bernas, 2004), job burnout (e.g.,
Peeters, Montgomery, Bakker, & Schaufeli,
2005), increased body mass index (BMI)
and cholesterol levels (Van Steenbergen &
Ellemers, 2009), and substance use/abuse
(e.g., Grzywacz & Bass, 2003). Given the
importance of the work and family roles in
the lives of working adults and for organiza-
tional and individual outcomes (Werbel &
Walter, 2002), it becomes even more impera-
tive to engage in research focused on miti-
gating the negative consequences associated
with work-family conflict. Thus, we consider
the role that exercise may play in managing
the work and family roles.
This article seeks to examine the effects of
exercise as a means of reducing perceptions
of WIF and FIW. Jex, Spector, Gudanowski,
and Newman (1991, p. 297) note that “the
variable ‘exercise’ is quite complex and multi-
faceted.” Thus, we use Caspersen, Powell, and
Christenson’s (1985, p. 128) seminal defini-
tion of a “physical activity that is planned,
structured, repetitive, and purposive” when
referring to exercise. We propose that exercise
has indirect effects (see Hayes, 2009; Mathieu
& Taylor, 2006) on work-family conflict via
an increase in self-efficacy to manage work-
family conflict and a decrease in psychologi-
cal strain.
From Exercise to Management
of Work-Family Confl ict
Exercise can be used to define a variety of
physical activities that are used to promote
well-being, such as running, weight lifting, or
aerobics (Ensel & Lin, 2004). Based on
Caspersen and colleagues’ definition above,
we refer to exercise as those physical activities
done on a regular basis. As noted earlier, the
attained more personal goals and had better
sales figures than those who did not (Goldsby,
Kuratko, & Bishop, 2005). Prescriptions to
executives have suggested that they work out
with weight training at least twice per week
in order to become a “corporate athlete”
(Loehr & Schwartz, 2001). It has even be-
come popular for organizations to promote
fitness via wellness programs (Kossek, Ozeki,
& Kosier, 2001), with some companies en-
couraging exercise through their wellness
benefit packages. For example, Zappos.com
and Google, both recently named to Fortune’s
“100 Best Companies to Work For,” provide
employees with on-site yoga and on-site well-
ness centers, respectively. In gen-
eral, research indicates positive
effects from exercise and related
organizational wellness programs,
such as reductions in absentee-
ism, increases in job satisfaction,
increases in employee morale and
retention, and decreases in health
insurance premiums (DeGroot &
Kiker, 2003; Kossek et al., 2001;
Parks & Steelman, 2008).
In spite of the current research
on the effects of exercise on
employees and organizations,
there is a paucity of research
on how exercise may impact an
individual’s work-family balance
beliefs and abilities. Some research
has shown the inability to exer-
cise as a consequence of conflict
between one’s work and family
roles (e.g., Allen & Armstrong,
2006; Grace, Williams, Stewart,
& Franche, 2006; Grzywacz & Marks, 2001;
Roos, Sarlio-Lähteenkorva, Lallukka, &
Lahelma, 2007). While these studies see lack
of exercise as a consequence of work-family
conflict, Allen and Armstrong (2006, p. 1217)
do posit that “although we theorized that
individuals experiencing work-family con-
flict would be less likely to exercise, it is also
plausible that those who exercise report less
work-family conflict.”
Conflict between the work and family
roles can manifest in two directions: work-
interfering-with-family (WIF) and family-

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT