Environmental and Climate Impacts of Food Production, Processing, Packaging, and Distribution

AuthorJason J. Czarnezki and Elisa K. Prescott
Pages113-128
Page 113
Chapter 7
Environmental and Climate Impacts
of Food Production, Processing,
Packaging, and Distribution
Jason J. Cza rnez ki and Elisa K. Prescott
Getting the average mea l from farm to plate in the United States is no sma ll task; a great deal of
energy and material inputs goes into producing, processing , packaging, and distributing food. A
commodity crop like corn, for example, could be cultivated in one state, say a midwestern state
like Iowa, shipped to a processing plant in Tennessee to take on an entirely new form like high fructose
corn syrup, packaged in plastic in Pennsylvania, and nally distributed as ketchup to a supermarket chain
in California. e modern food system is fossil fuel-intensive and often environmentally damaging, mak-
ing the t rue cost of our food much greater than the price we pay at t he supermarket. Only recently have
environmentalists and environmental law scholars focused on the ecological impacts of food choices and
considered how industrial food production has been responsible for signicant greenhouse gases emissions.1
is chapter, focusing on produce and grain,2 discusses the environmental and climate change impacts
of food production, processing, packaging, and distribution, which ultimately contribute to both economic
and social costs.3 e chapter addresses environmental energy costs in the food supply. Figure 7.1 shows,
for example, the signi cant amount of energy used in various aspects of food production, transportation,
and processing.
1. See, e.g., J E. MW, J F 1 (Back Bay Books 2010); J J. C, E E: L, N 
I B (2011).
2. Although the product ion of live stock is a signicant contributor to the carb on footprin t and enviro nment impac ts, it will not be dis -
cussed h ere.
3. At the outset, we must recognize the diculty scientists have had in evaluating the environmental costs of the life-cycle of food, given the food
system’s geographic diusion, the inability to disaggregate all commodity production from food (e.g., ethanol), and the complexity of import
and export systems. Martin C. Heller & Gregory A. Keoleian, Assessing the Sustainability of the U.S. Food System: A Life Cycle Assessment, 76
A. S 1007, 1009 (2003); Karin Anderson & omas Ohlsson, Life Cycle Assessment of Bread Produced on Dierent Scales, 4 I’
J. L C A 25, 25 (1999).
Page 114 Food, Agriculture, and Environmental Law
Figure 7.1
Life-Cycle Energy Use in Supplying U.S. Food4
Note: KJ is a Kil ojoule and TJ is a terajoule. Bot h are measurements of energ y.
Much of this chapter’s focus will be on commodity crops. Along with wheat and rice, corn and soybeans
constitute the world’s most popula r planted and consumed crops.5 e United States is the leading pro-
ducer of corn, growing nearly 40% of the world’s total,6 with more than ha lf of that production coming
from only 20% of U.S. corn growers.7 In 2008 over 85 million acres of corn and more than 75 million acres
of soybeans were planted in the United States,8 and the crops “ have faced increasing demand in t he world
market over the past ten years as t hey are sources of both human and animal food.”9
is chapter illustrates the environmental impacts of the food system. It opens with a discussion of
the industria l food system, exploring both conventional and organic models. It then looks at the carbon
footprint of food production, as well as the environmental impacts of production, specic ally soil, water,
and air pollution. e next section discusses food processing and associated greenhouse gas emissions and
environmental impacts. e chapter then considers the environmental and climate change impacts of
packaging from creation to disposal. e nal section addresses food distribution and the distance food
travels to get to our plates, also known as food miles.
A. Food, Agriculture, and the Environment
ere is a closed-loop relationship between the current agriculture system and the climate crisis. With
changing temperature a nd rainfa ll patterns, climate change may have a dra matic impact on food produc-
tion and agricultural geography. Completing the circle, current agricu ltural practices are fossil fuel-inten-
4. Heller & Keoleian, supra note 3, at 1025.
5. M P  Z W, F S C: E, S  E P 64 (2011). See also
C, supra note 1, at 75-77 (2011).
6. Kimbrell, Andrew, A Blow to the Breadbasket: Industrial Grain Production, in F H: T T  I A 100
(Andrew Kimbrell ed., 2002).
7. Id.
8. Darrel Good, Weekly Outlook: Corn and Soybean Acreage, ACES N (Jan. 20, 2009), http://www.aces.uiuc.edu/news/stories/news4630.html.
9. P  W, supra note 5, at 67.
Agricultural production
Transportation
(raw and processed products
Processing
(food and kindred products)
Packaging material
Food retail
Commercial food service
Household storage and preparation
TOTAL energy consumed
Food energy available for consumption
(equivalent to 15900 KJ
per capita per day)
0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000
TJ (1012 J) per year

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT