Bibliography

• Author: Michael J. Morse
• Pages: 903-924

F-1

Legal References

Annotations

“Thermographic Tests: Admissibility of Test

Results in Personal Injury Suits,” 56 A.L.R.

4th 1105 (1987)

“Recovery for Loss of Consortium for Injury

Occurring Prior to Marriage,” 5 A.L.R. 4th

300 (1985)

“Loss of Enjoyment of Life as a Distinct Ele-

ment or Factor in Awarding Damages for

Bodily Injury,” 34 A.L.R. 4th 293 (1985)

“Effect of Anticipated Inflation on Damages for

Future Losses—Modern Cases,” 21 A.L.R.

4th 21 (1983)

“Wife’s Right of Action for Loss of Consor-

tium,” 36 A.L.R. 3d 900 (1981)

“Profits of Business as Factor in Determin-

ing Loss of Earnings or Earning Capacity

in Action for Personal Injury or Death,” 45

A.L.R. 3d. 345 (1972)

“Sufficiency of Evidence in Personal Injury

Action to Prove Impairment of Earning

Capacity and to Warrant Instructions to

Jury Thereon,” 18 A.L.R. 3d 88 (1968)

“Instructions in a Personal Injury Action which,

in Effect, Tells Jurors that in Assessing

Damages They Should Put Themselves in

an Injured Person’s Place,” 96 A.L.R. 2d 760

(1964)

“Admissibility, as Against Objection of Remote-

ness of Evidence as to Past Earnings, Upon

Issue as to Amount of Damages in an

Action for Personal Injury or Death,” 81

A.L.R. 2d 733 (1962)

“Admissibility in Evidence of Braces, Crutches

or Other Prosthetic or Orthopedic Devices

used by Injured Party,” 83 A.L.R. 2d 1271

(1962)

“Admissibility of Evidence of Plaintiff’s or

Decedent’s Drawings from Partnership or

Other Business as Evidence of Earning

Capacity in Action for Personal Injury or

Death,” 82 A.L.R. 2d 679 (1962)

“Admissibility in Evidence of Enlarged Photo-

graphs or Photostatic Copies,” 72 A.L.R. 2d

308 (1960)

“Propriety of Permitting Plaintiff in Personal

Injury Action to Exhibit his Person to Jury,”

66 A.L.R. 2d 1334 (1959)

“Permitting Demonstration to Show Effect of

Injury in Action for Bodily Damage,” 66

A.L.R. 2d 1382 (1959)

“Propriety in Trial of Civil Action, of Use of

Skeleton or Model of Human Body or Part,”

58 A.L.R. 2d 689 (1958)

“Prejudicial Effect in Civil Trial of Counsel’s

Misconduct in Physically Exhibiting to Jury

Objects or Items Not Introduced as Evi-

dence,” 37 A.L.R. 2d 662 (1954)

“What Items of Damages on Account of Per-

sonal Injury to Infant Belong to Him and

What to Parent,” 32 A.L.R. 2d 1060 (1953)

“Proof of Prospective Earning Capacity of Stu-

dent or Trainee, or of Its Loss, in Action

for Personal Injury or Death,” 15 A.L.R. 2d

418 (1951)

Articles

Altman & Collins, “Musculoskeletal Manifesta-

tion of Paget’s Disease of Bone,” 23 ARTHRITIS

RHEUM. 1121 (1980)

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPEDIC SURGEONS:

MANUAL FOR ORTHOPEDIC SURGEONS IN EVALU-

ATING PERMANENT PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT (1962)

Andrews, “Computer Integrated Courtrooms:

Enhancing Advocacy,” 28 TRIAL 9 (Septem-

ber 1992)

Applegate, “Preparing for Rule 612,” 19 LITIGA-

TION 3 (Spring 1993)

Archer, “Thermograms: Persuasive Tools in

Soft-Tissue Injury Cases,” 19 TRIAL 2

(Feb. 1983)

Arnett, “Reiter’s Syndrome,” 150 JOHNS HOP-

KINS MED. J. 39 (1982)

Ash, “The Misuse of Thermography in the

Courtroom,” 53 INS. COUNC IL J. 601 (Octo-

ber 1986)

Avecilla, “Professional Certification and Site

Accreditation in Bone Densitometry,” 1 J.

CLIN. DENSITOMETRY 18 (1998)

Baeroy, et al., “Elevated CSF Levels of Sub-

stance P and High Instance of Raynaud’s

Phenomena in Patients with Fibromyalgia:

New Features for Diagnosis,” 32 PAIN 21

(1988)

Bailey, “Making the Most of Day-in-the-Life

Films,” 30 TRIAL4 (April 1994)

Bailey, “The Artful Lawyer: More Show, Less

Tell in Opening Statement,” 29 TRIAL 10

(October 1993)

Bailey, “Using Computer Technology to Pre-

pare for Trial,” 34 TRIAL 4 at 44 (April

1998)

BIBLIOGRAPHY

LITIGATING NECK AND BACK INJURIES

n

F-2

Bailey, “Videotape Evidence: Show Me, Don’t

Tell Me,” 27 TRIAL 3 (March 1991)

Bain & Broderick, “Demonstrative Evi dence:

Clarifying Its Role at Trial,” 30 TRIAL 9 (Sep-

tember 1994)

Bain & Broderick, “Demonstrative Evidence:

The Next Generation,” 17 LITIGATION 4 (Sum-

mer 1991)

Bain & King, “Guidelines for the Admissi bility

of Evidence Generated by Computer for the

Purpose of Litigation,” 15 U.C.D. L. REV.

951 (1982)

Baldwin, “Crossing the Expert,” 32 TRIAL 12

at 56 (December 1996)

Ball, “Story and Structure for Plaintiffs,” 31

The Brief 4 at 54 (Summer 2002)

Bansal, et al., “The Treatment of Metastatic

Spinal Cord Tumors,” 202 JAMA 686 (1967)

Barnsley, Lord & Bogduk, “Whiplash Injury,”

58 PAIN 283 (1994)

Bartimus & Eaton, “Should You Accept the

Case?” 32 TRIAL at 50 (May 1996)

Baum, “Creating a Theme,” 30 TRIAL 3

(March 1994)

Becton, “Help the Jury Understand Pain and

Suffering,” 41 TRIAL 60 (March 2005) at 61.

Bennett, “How to Use Computer Graphics and

Animation at Trial,” 1 THE PRACTICAL LITIGA-

TOR 6 (November 1990)

Berger, “The 1999 John Shepherd Memorial

Lecture: Expert Testimony After Kumho,” 8

TRIAL EVIDENCE 2 (Summer 1999)

Berman, “Q: Is This Any Way to Write an

Interrogatory? A: You Bet It Is,” 19 LITIGA-

TION 4 (Summer 1993)

Bernad, “What The Defense Should Know

About Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI),”

1 PERSONAL INJURY LAW: DEFENSE BULLETIN 1

(June 1987)

Bernstein, “Winning Trials Nonverbally,” 30

TRIAL 1 (Jan. 1994)

Blake, “Neutralizing the ‘Independent’ Defense

Medical Expert,” 34 TRIAL 2 at 28 (Febru-

ary 1998)

Blitman, “Ingredients for a Successful Media-

tion,” 44 FOR THE DEFENSE 16 (August 2002)

Blumer & Heilbronn, “Antidepressant Treat-

ment for Chronic Pain: Treatment Outcome

of 1,000 Patients With Pain Prone Disor-

der,” 14 PSYCHIATRIC ANN. 796 (1984)

Blumer & Heilbronn, “Chronic Pain as a Vari-

ant of Depressive Illness: The Pain Prone

Disorder,” 170 J. NERV. MENT. DIS. 381 (1982)

Bobb, “Just Say No!” 32 TRIAL 12 (Decem-

ber 1996)

Brady, “A New Predictability in Punitive Dam-

ages?” 45 FOR THE DEFENSE 10 (June 2003)

Bright, “How to Succeed on Appeal: A View from

the Bench,” 27 TRIAL 11 (November 1991)

Bronfort, “Spinal Manipulation: Current State

of Research and Its Indications,” 17 NEU-

ROL. CLIN. 91 (1999)

Bunge, “Demonstrative Evidence—A Grand-

stand Play,” 42 ILL. B. J. 72 (1953)

Burke & Friel, “What Schleier and Amended §

104(a)(2) Mean to Your Practice: Tax Consid-

erations in Pleadings and Settlement Agree-

ments,” 32 TRIAL 11 (November 1996)

Cabaniss, “The Basics: Choosing and Using

an Expert Witness,” 33 TRIAL 6 at 46

(June 1997)

Carlson & Graeven, “The Development of Trial

Themes in Catastrophe Losses,” 31 The

Brief 4 at 20 (Summer 2002)

Carrigan, “Some Nuts and Bolts of Appellate

Advocacy,” LITIGATION (Spring 1980)

Cartwright & Kassel, “Evaluating Emotional

Damages: The Role of Psycho-Social Assess-

ments,” 24 TRIAL 77 (May 1988)

Carter, “Attorney Involvement in Preparing

Expert Reports: Drawing the Line,” 19 LITI-

GATION 4 (Summer 1993)

Cashi, “How to Conduct Electronic Media Dis-

covery,” 7 PRAC. LIT. 75 (1996)

Caspar, et al., “Anterior Cervical Plate Stabi-

lization in One and Two Level Degenerative

Disease: Overtreatment or Benefit?” 11 J.

SPINAL. DIS. 1 (1998)

Casper, “Looking Fraudulent Surveillance in

the Eye: How to Refute Distorted Evidence,”

29 TRIAL 1 (January 1993)

Cassell, “The Nature of Suffering and the

Goals of Medicine,” 306 NEW ENG. J. MED.

639 (1945)

Chaney, “Computer Simulations: How They

Can Be Used at Trial and the Arguments

for Admissibility,” 19 IND. L REV. 735 (1986)

Charkes, Durant & Barry, “Bone Pain in Mul-

tiple Myeloma: Studies With Radioactive

87mSR,” 130 ARCH. INTERN. MED. 53 (1972)

Chu, “Discovery of Experts,” 8 LITIGATION 13

(Winter 1982)

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS OF THE SPINE (White &

Panjabi, eds., 1990)

Clough & Price, “Aneurysmal Bone Cyst: The

Pathogenesis and Long Term Results of

Treatment,” 97 CLIN. ORTHOP. 52 (1973)

Coben, “The Daubert Decision: Gatekeeper or

Executioner?” 32 TRIAL 8 (August 1996)

Colledge, et al., “Functional Ability Assessment:

Guidelines for the Workplace,” 41 J. OCCUP. &

ENVT’L MED. 172 (1998)