Appendix M. 1993 Horizontal Merger Guidelines of the National Association of Attorneys General

Pages755-785
755
APPENDIX M
1993 HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES
OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
ATTORNEYS GENERAL
1. Purpose and Scope of the Guidelines
2. Policies Underlying These Guidelines
2.1 The Economic Effects of Mergers
2.11 Acquisition of Market Power and Wealth Transfers
2.12 Productive Efficiency
2.13 Allocative Efficiency
2.14 Raising Rivals’ Costs
3. Market Definition
3.1 Product Market Definition
3.11 Consumers Who May Be Vulnerable to Price
Discrimination
3.2 Geographic Market Definition
3.21 Geographic Markets Subject to Price Discrimination
3.3 Principles for Recognizing Potential Competition
3.31 Expansion of Output
3.32 New Sources of Additional Supply
3.4 Calculating Market Shares
3.41 Foreign Firms
3.411 Alternative Method for Defining Markets Utilizing
the Methodology of the United States Department of
Justice/Federal Trade Commission Merger
Guidelines
4. Measurement of Concentration
4.1 General Standards
4.2 Post-Merger HHI between 1000 and 1800
4.3 Post-Merger HHI Above 1800
4.4 Mergers Involving the Leading Firm or a New Innovative Firm
in a Market
5. Additional Factors Which May be Considered in Determining
Whether to Challenge a Merger
5.1 East of Entry
5.11 Overview
756 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
5.12 Timeliness of Entry
5.13 Likelihood of Entry
5.14 Sufficiency of Entry
5.15 Entry Alternatives
5.151 Diversion of Existing Supplies into the Market
5.151(1)Exports
5.151(2)Internal Consumption
5.151(3)Increased Importation
5.152 New Production Sources of Additional Supply
5.152(1)Production Flexibility
5.152(2)Construction of New Facilities
5.152(3)Arbitrage
5.2 Collusion and Oligopolistic Behavior
5.3 Efficiencies
5.4 Powerful or Sophisticated Buyers
6. Failing Firm Defense
1. Purpose and Scope of the Guidelines
These guidelines explain the general enforcement policy of the state
and territorial attorneys general (“the Attorneys General”) who comprise
the National Association of Attorneys General1 (“NAAG”) concerning
horizontal acquisitions and mergers2 (collectively “mergers”) subject to
section 7 of the Clayton Act,3 sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act4 and
1.The Attorneys General of American Samoa, Guam, The Commonwealth
of Northern Marianas Islands, The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the
Virgin Islands are members of NAAG.
2.A horizontal merger involves firms that are actually or potentially in both
the same product and geographic markets, as those markets are defined in
Section 3 of these guidelines.
3.Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18, prohibits mergers if their
effect “may be substantially to lessen competition or to tend to create a
monopoly.”
4.Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, prohibits mergers which
constitute an unreasonable “restraint of trade.” Section 2 of the Sherman
Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, prohibits mergers which create a monopoly or
constitute an attempt, combination or conspiracy to monopolize.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT