Adjusting Rights by Private Agreement: Covenants

AuthorAlan R. Romero
ProfessionProfessor of law and Director of the Rural Law Center at the University of Wyoming College of Law
Pages55-78
Chapter 5
Adjusting Rights by Private
Agreement: Covenants
In This Chapter
Understanding what covenants are and how they’re created
Examining the requirements for covenants to run with the land at law and in equity
Interpreting and applying covenants
Amending and terminating covenants
P
roperty owners can customize their rights and reconcile them with
other owners by private agreement. One way to do that is by using
covenants. In general, a covenant is just a contractual promise from one
person to another person. If a covenant doesn’t relate to land, it’s just a
contract, which you can read about in Contract Law For Dummies by Scott J.
Burnham (Wiley). This chapter is about covenants that relate to land.
When a landowner covenants to do or not to do something on land, not only
does she have a contractual obligation to the person to whom she made the
promise, but she may also have an obligation to people who acquire that
person’s land in the future. And people who acquire her land in the future
may be obligated to keep performing her promise.
This chapter clarifies how parties may expressly or implicitly make covenants
that relate to land and when those covenants burden and benefit later
owners of land. It also explains how to interpret, amend, and terminate such
covenants.
Introducing Land-Related Covenants
A covenant may relate to the land by promising to do something on land or
by promising not to do something on land. Covenants thus may be described
as follows:
56 Part II: Understanding Real Property Rights
Negative: A negative covenant, or restrictive covenant, is a covenant that
the property owner will not do or allow certain things on her land. For
example, a covenant not to use a property for commercial purposes is a
restrictive covenant. Most covenants are restrictive.
Affirmative: An affirmative covenant is a promise to do something.
It may be a promise to do something on the benefited land, such as
providing heat to a building on the covenantee’s land. Or it may be a
promise to do something on the covenantor’s burdened land, such as
maintaining certain types of landscaping features on her land. An
affirmative covenant may even be a promise to pay money, like a
covenant to pay dues to a homeowners’ association.
When covenants relate to land, they create a legal interest in land and therefore
must comply with the statute of frauds. The statute of frauds, which Chapter 15
talks about in detail, requires written evidence of an interest in real property,
signed by the party that’s denying the creation of the interest.
Most covenants are created in instruments granting other interests, such as
deeds or leases, and so satisfy the statute of frauds. Even if a covenant isn’t
in writing, estoppel may allow it to be enforced. Chapter 15 talks about
estoppel more, but here’s the short version: If a party reasonably expends
significant value in reliance on a covenant, she may enforce the covenant
even if it isn’t written. For example, if the benefited party builds a house,
relying on a neighbor’s covenant not to build a tall building next door, the
neighbor may be estopped from denying the existence of the covenant.
If the covenant satisfies the statute of frauds, the original parties to the
covenant can enforce the agreement against each other just like they could
enforce any other contract. The covenant doesn’t have to meet any special
property law requirements for the original parties to enforce it.
But the covenant does have to meet special requirements in order to be
enforced by and against subsequent owners of the original parties’ lands. The
following sections talk about those requirements.
Enforcing a Running Covenant at Law
Covenants that are related to the land can run with the land. That means the
covenant attaches to the land so that subsequent owners of the benefited
land can enforce the covenant against subsequent owners of the burdened
land. Of course, subsequent owners could voluntarily accept an assignment
of contract rights and duties by their predecessors who originally made the
contract. But a covenant that runs with the land binds and benefits successors
regardless of whether they agree. In effect, the covenant just becomes part of
the land.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT