Recognizing the Limits of Public Regulation

AuthorAlan R. Romero
ProfessionProfessor of law and Director of the Rural Law Center at the University of Wyoming College of Law
Pages113-130
Chapter 8
Recognizing the Limits of
Public Regulation
In This Chapter
Understanding common state statutory limitations on local zoning ordinances
Applying the substantive due process doctrine to land use regulation
Determining when land use regulations take property and require just compensation
Considering how the Equal Protection Clause limits public regulation
Regulating signs and other land uses related to free speech
E
ven though governments can adjust private property rights to serve
public purposes, the power to regulate land use isn’t unlimited. In
other words, the government can’t just do whatever it wants. Both statutes
and constitutions limit the government’s power to regulate land use. So if
you want to know what a property owner can do with her property, it isn’t
enough to know what the local zoning ordinance allows and prohibits. You
also have to consider whether that local ordinance is valid and enforceable.
That’s what this chapter is about. It fills you in on the most important
statutory and constitutional limitations on zoning regulations.
Looking for the Local Power Source:
State Enabling Statutes
States generally delegate the authority to regulate land use to cities and
counties through state statutes called enabling acts. Because the state
enabling act is the source of local power to zone or otherwise regulate land
use, a local government can exercise that power only as authorized by the
state enabling act. If some part of the local zoning ordinance conflicts with the
state enabling act in some way, that part of the local ordinance is invalid. In
this way, the state enabling act limits local zoning authority.
114 Part II: Understanding Real Property Rights
Most state constitutions give cities, and maybe counties, too, the power to
exercise home rule. That generally means that a city can adopt a charter
specifying local authority it can exercise without specific state authorization. If
a city exercises home rule power to zone, it may not have to comply with the
state enabling act. But even then, some states with home rule provisions say
that because land-use regulation is a matter of state as well as local concern,
the local zoning still must comply with requirements of the state enabling act.
All 50 states have zoning enabling acts that authorize local governments to
zone. These state enabling acts can differ, of course. But almost all these acts
are based on the Standard State Zoning Enabling Act, published by the
U.S. Department of Commerce in the 1920s, and therefore share some basic
elements:
Types of restrictions: In the words of the Standard State Zoning Enabling
Act, a zoning ordinance may “regulate and restrict the height, number of
stories, and size of buildings and other structures, the percentage of lot
that may be occupied, the size of yards, courts and other open spaces,
the density of population, and the location and use of buildings, structures
and land for trade, industry, residences or other purposes.”
Uniformity within districts: The standard act says that zoning regulations
“shall be uniform for each class or kind of buildings throughout each
district, but the regulations in one district may differ from those in other
districts.”
Purposes: Section 3 of the Standard State Zoning Enabling Act lists the
permissible purposes of zoning ordinances, which include specific
purposes such as lessening street congestion and avoiding overcrowding
as well as the broad purpose of promoting “health and general welfare.”
Power to grant variances: If the locality chooses, the local ordinance
may provide for a board of adjustment. If so, the enabling act specifies
the board of adjustment’s powers, including the criteria for granting a
variance from requirements of the zoning ordinance.
Consistency with a comprehensive plan: The Standard State Zoning
Enabling Act says the local ordinance must be “made in accordance with
a comprehensive plan.” In most states, this doesn’t mean the locality
must actually adopt a document called a “comprehensive plan”; it just
means that the regulation must be a rational and comprehensive way
to regulate land use for the benefit of the public. But in some states,
the local government does have to adopt a comprehensive plan for the
community before it can zone. And in some states, the zoning ordinance
must comply with the comprehensive plan or at least be in basic harmony
with it. Chapter 7 talks more about zoning in accordance with a
comprehensive plan.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT