O

AuthorMark Thompson/Elizabeth Smith
Pages614-632
M–R
-O-
-O-
O’CONNELL, Beverly Reid
Temperament/Demeanor
Judge O’Connell “is very personable. She is a wonder-
ful judge to work with. I have nothing but praise for her.
I think she’s a great judge,” one interviewee said. Another
said, “She treats everybody with dignity and respect. There’s
only one rule in her court: tell the truth.” Other interviewees
said Judge O’Connell has “good judicial temperament,” has
“great” demeanor and is “very nice” but “pretty straight.”
Intelligence/Knowledge
One interviewee called Judge O’Connell “one of the bright-
est, most intelligent and fairest judges to come along in the
last 30 years of my career. It’s unbelievable how good she is.”
Other interviewees were equally effusive in their praise for
Judge O’Connell’s knowledge of law. “She is incredibly intel-
ligent, and she is very smart,” said a prosecutor. “I think her
knowledge of law is phenomenal,” a criminal defense attor-
ney added. Another defense attorney, who noted that Judge
O’Connell is a former federal prosecutor, added, “She has
forgotten more about search and seizure than most judges
have ever known.”
On Motions
In her rulings on motions, a prosecutor said Judge
O’Connell “reasons them out. She follows the law. She will
look up any case you present to her. If you think it will sup-
port your position on a motion, she looks it up, she reads
it and she explains to you whether she is ruling for you or
against you and her rationale behind her rulings. You really
can’t dispute it when she follows the law, regardless of which
side you end up on. When she rules against me, I never take
it personally, because she explains her rulings and it makes
sense,” the prosecutor said. A criminal defense attorney
added, “She calls them just like she sees them. It doesn’t
matter if it’s a pound of dope or 100 pounds of dope, the
decision will be the same.” “I think she is well liked by every-
body,” defense attorneys as well as prosecutors, “because I
think she reasons out her decisions and goes by the law,”
a third interviewee said. “I don’t agree with the results all
the time, but I think she gives her rulings thought and she
makes the decision based on what the law is and regardless
of the consequences, which is all we can ask for.” Several
other interviewees offered similar observations. “She consid-
ers motions very carefully.” “She makes sound legal deci-
sions, and very, very good evidentiary rulings.”
On Trial
One of the interviewees who has tried cases in Judge
O’Connell’s court said, “She is a fine judge, the kind of judge
you want to try cases in front of again and again.” Another
interviewee said her court is “a good place for a good law-
yer but not a good place for a bad lawyer.” The interviewee
advised lawyers facing a trial in her court to “be prepared
and do your homework. She reads everything. Not only does
she read everything, she does her own research on top of
what you do.” Another interviewee who started a trial in
Judge O’Connell’s court added, “I think she is a good judge.
I have heard good things about her. I was picking a jury in
her court when the case finally resolved itself. She seems a
little rigid, but overall, I would give her high marks. When
she spreads her wings, she will become a better judge.”
Continuances
A deputy public defender with extensive experience before
Judge O’Connell said, “I have never had any problems with
her on continuances. Our staff in there pretty much knows
what we are doing. I have seen her give private counsel a bit
of a hard time. But I, too, would have hammered them when
they came in with bogus ideas for putting things over for no
particular reason and wasting people’s time. She is pretty
firm about running her court in a reasonable fashion, but I
don’t think she is unreasonable about continuing things. I
give her high marks for that. She is not easy, but she is not
difficult either.” Another interviewee said Judge O’Connell
“tries very hard to prevent cases from aging. Before she got
here, our court seemed to allow cases to age, and it was part
of the culture here. It was hard to break it, but she tried as
best as she can. If somebody comes up with good cause,
she has to grant the continuance. But she tries to stick to, I
think, a 120-day rule” for criminal cases. “She tries to make
sure the cases don’t age beyond that.”
Settlement
Judge O’Connell does not interject herself into settlement
negotiations unless asked by the parties, two interviewees
said. “She generally lets us do what we are going to do and
she will go along with it,” said a public defender. “She doesn’t
put a lot of pressure on one side or the other. She leaves it
open for both the district attorney and defense counsel to
resolve matters. So I wouldn’t say she is really proactive in
terms of settling cases.” The other interviewee, a prosecutor,
added, “If one side or the other, usually the defense, requests
a sidebar or chamber conference to discuss the case, because
they don’t agree with my offer or somebody else’s offer, cer-
tainly she will get involved. She will give both sides her per-
spective as to whether she agrees with my offer or not. But
she isn’t necessarily proactive to the point where she will offer
unsolicited input, other than to make an inquiry about what
the offer was and whether the defendant will go to trial. But
she will participate when requested, absolutely.”
Proclivities
Defense attorneys and a prosecutor who were interviewed
about Judge O’Connell were unanimous in praising her
sense of fairness. “I think she is evenhanded, both to the
prosecution and the defense side. She is very evenhanded,”
a defense attorney said. “She gives out a disclosure that she
is married to a deputy district attorney. But I have litigated
things in her court and I consider her to be very fair.” By
way of example, the attorney recalled a case in which she
displayed a willingness to reconsider her initial decision after
hearing of the defendant’s personal circumstances. “I just
did a sentencing with a defendant, a young man, who was
rather obstreperous in court. He didn’t have a bad record,
but she at first was reluctant to grant him fire camp. But
after I talked to her, she changed her mind and recom-
mended fire camp for this young man, which I thought was
a very fair thing to do.” Another defense attorney said, “If
every judge was like Judge O’Connell, being a defense attor-
ney would be a pleasure.” Two other attorneys praised her
as “one of the fairest judges” on the bench, and a judge who
can be counted on to make “good, fair rulings.”
Summary
Judge O’Connell won high praise from all interviewees,
criminal defense attorneys and prosecutors alike, for her
outstanding knowledge of criminal law and her carefully
considered and thoroughly explained rulings. She is a “won-
derful,” “phenomenal” judge, interviewees said. (09M)
O’DONNELL, Joanne B.
Temperament/Demeanor
Attorneys with experience before Judge O’Donnell seem to
be sharply divided in their opinion of her. Their main com-
plaint is that she is unpredictable in her rulings, or “off the
wall,” as one lawyer put it. For that reason, “A lot of attor-
neys will not accept her at all.” Some attorneys also believe
she lacks experience. However, another interviewee said,
“She lacks a lot more than experience.” But not even her
critics complain about her demeanor. “She’s very nice. But
she’s not one of the better judges in the building. Let’s leave
it at that,” one of the critics said. Judge O’Donnell has fans
as well as critics. They say she has improved over time after
overcoming some “adjustment issues.” And they have no
complaints about her demeanor. “I think she’s adapted very
well to family court. I’ve had very good experiences in her
court in terms of judicial demeanor and the like,” said one
of her fans. Others said she’s “pleasant to try a case in front
of” and she “gets high marks from me. I like her. She’s fine.”
604O’Connell California Judge Reviews
CJ_Volume_2.indb 604CJ_Volume_2.indb 604 9/5/2014 12:47:52 PM9/5/2014 12:47:52 PM
M–R
Intelligence/Knowledge
An attorney who called Judge O’Donnell highly unpredict-
able rated her knowledge of law as no better than “fair.” But
other attorneys praised her knowledge of law and especially
her high level of preparedness. After a slow start in family
law, a new field for her, her grasp of the field improved mark-
edly, said a family law attorney who pronounced her “up to
snuff.” Other attorneys said: “One of her strong qualities is
that she reads the papers. She really pays attention.” “She is
prepared. You can tell she is reading the materials.”
On Motions
With years of experience as a litigator in private prac-
tice, Judge O’Donnell is adept at handling motions, attor-
neys said. One attorney who was initially “hesitant” to try a
case before Judge O’Donnell, wondering “if she really knew
what she was doing,” ended up being highly impressed
with how she untangled a mountain of orders and motions
in one “horrendous case” with a “nightmare 10-volume
case file.” Judge O’Donnell “went through it item by item,
and ruled very cleanly on all the motions, cleaned up all
the prior orders, all the orders to show cause, and reduced
everything to one coherent order. I was very pleased.”
Other attorneys said: “She’s pretty good on evidence. And
she seems to have a pretty good handle on making appro-
priate orders.” “She seems to be willing to be flexible and
willing to listen.” Several attorneys who complained that
Judge O’Donnell is highly unpredictable were critical of
the way she handles motions. “She seems to take every
case on a case by case basis so it’s hard for attorneys to
know what one should do in her court. You have absolutely
no idea how she is going to rule, and she won’t tell you,
whether it has to do with witnesses, experts or anything
else.” Another critical attorney said: “I have done very, very
well in front of her but just recently I had another case
where she came out with the most bizarre ruling, which got
overturned on appeal. The fact that she is so unpredictable
is the biggest problem.”
On Trial
One family lawyer who has had several “full blown trials”
in front of Judge O’Donnell said that although she had some
litigation experience, she “wasn’t initially in tune with fam-
ily law in the beginning. But I think she has come up to the
standard.” Another attorney said she is liberal about allow-
ing evidence to be presented in trials: “She’s interested in
hearing everything there is to hear.” An attorney, who tried
two “huge cases” in Judge O’Donnell’s court, said she is very
good at “reducing the number of issues and moving the case
expeditiously through the process.” In one of the cases, “We
went into chambers, and she had outlined the pleadings, all
of the issues, she had flow charts of who was arguing what,
what had been resolved, and what was still on calendar.”
Continuances
“[Judge O’Donnell is] not necessarily averse to granting a
continuance if you have a good reason,” one attorney said.
Others agreed that she is reasonable and will give attorneys
more time if necessary. It helps that “she’s got a nice clerk”
who helps facilitate requests for continuance, an attorney
observed. But she won’t let cases drag on unnecessarily. In
one case, an attorney recalled, she made it clear she wasn’t
going to grant continuances and spent several hours resolv-
ing a number of issues then and there.
Settlement
An attorney with experience in settling cases before
Judge O’Donnell said she’s willing to help if asked. “When
I said to her that maybe we could talk in chambers “off the
record” to resolve a case, “she accepted the invitation when
some other judges might have said no. This particular case
required that. Some judges don’t want that. They want you
to come down and put on your first witness. They don’t want
to massage a case.” But she was happy to participate in the
settlement process. Another attorney said, “I’ve settled some
cases for her when I was the mediator and I know she was
very happy they settled. So I know she is in favor of settle-
ments. But I don’t know that she does anything particular to
cause cases to settle.”
Proclivities
Several attorneys said Judge O’Donnell is reputed to
favor the woman in family law cases. But in fact it is hard
to predict which side she will favor. “Speaking with other
attorneys, we think she favors women somewhat. But that
isn’t her biggest fault. Her biggest fault is that she’s too
unpredictable.” Two attorneys said that Judge O’Donnell is
so unpredictable that she “scares the [heck] out of them.”
“She gave me a phenomenal order, in favor of my client, a
woman, that was so unreasonable in my favor that it scared
the heck out of me. If she could do it in my favor, she could
do it against me,” one attorney said. Another said, “I don’t
boast when I do very well in front of her because she is just
as likely to come up with something else that makes no
sense. It’s not because of the merits. It’s not because she got
it. It’s because ... who knows why? That’s why it’s scary.”
Other attorneys disputed the criticisms. “I can’t say she
favors women. I represented a woman in front of her and
she took a waxing. There is unpredictability with all of the
judges, and she’s no worse than the others. In fact, I think
she’s doing much better now than when she first came on
the [family] court.”
Summary
Several lawyers contended that Judge O’Donnell is such
an unpredictable “loose cannon” that she “scares everyone.”
But another group of lawyers offered a strikingly different
assessment. “You may not agree with her interpretation of
the law every time, and she may not agree with your inter-
pretation of the facts,” one of her supporters said, “but I
tend to judge judges on whether they are prepared, whether
they’ve read the materials, know the relevant case law and
statutes, are listening to both sides, are helping move the
case forward. I would give her high marks in all of those
areas.” (01E)
O’MALLEY, Mary Ann
Temperament/Demeanor
Judge O’Malley’s mien seems to appeal to most inter-
viewees. They said, “It’s highly excellent,” “It’s wonderful.
Her demeanor is very pleasant,” “It’s outstanding,” “It’s very
professional” and “She’s friendly and outgoing.” Only one
attorney proffered mild criticism by saying, “[Her demeanor
is] usually good but she can be brash sometimes.”
Intelligence/Knowledge
The majority of the interviewees either said Judge
O’Malley’s legal knowledge is “excellent” or “above average.”
Others opined, “It’s well above average” and “It’s average to
above average.”
On Motions
Judge O’Malley’s courtroom management style was char-
acterized as entirely positive, though slightly variant terms.
Interviewees said, “It’s relaxed but businesslike.” “She main-
tains good control,” “It’s formal,” “It’s very efficient and some-
what formal,” “It’s somewhat relaxed” and “It’s formal and
professional.” Litigators said they appreciated this judge’s
courteous behavior. As one of them put it, “She’s polite
to everyone, including the attorneys and the defendants.”
Another lawyer agreed and said, “She’s 100% polite.” This
jurist was also praised for always taking the bench on time.
Attorneys said Judge O’Malley’s courtroom atmosphere is
usually best described as “comfortable,” “professional” or
“very comfortable.”
On Trial
Almost all of the interviewees said Judge O’Malley listens
closely to their arguments and keeps an open mind. The one
dissenting lawyer opined, “She listens closely, but she’s not
open minded about bail issues.” Every interviewee said this
judge moves her cases at a proper pace. In fact, half of them
described the pace as “appropriate [to each case].” Others
said, “She moves cases at an average” pace, “Judge O’Malley
keeps things moving at a good clip” and “She moves cases a
little faster [than her peers.] But she gives you enough time
to present your case.” Lawyers seem pleased with the way
Profiles O’Malley605
CJ_Volume_2.indb 605CJ_Volume_2.indb 605 9/5/2014 12:47:52 PM9/5/2014 12:47:52 PM

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT