Journal of Appellate Practice and Process

- Publisher:
- University of Arizona, Arizona Board of Regents
- Publication date:
- 2011-12-20
- ISBN:
- 1533-4724
- Copyright:
- COPYRIGHT TV Trade Media, Inc.<br/>COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Issue Number
- Vol. 23 Nbr. 1, January 2023
- Vol. 22 Nbr. 2, June 2022
- Vol. 22 Nbr. 1, January 2022
- Vol. 21 Nbr. 2, June 2021
- Vol. 21 Nbr. 1, January 2021
- Vol. 20 Nbr. 2, September 2019
- Vol. 20 Nbr. 1, March 2019
- Vol. 19 Nbr. 2, September 2018
- Vol. 19 Nbr. 1, March 2018
- Vol. 18 Nbr. 2, September 2017
- Vol. 18 Nbr. 1, March 2017
- Vol. 17 Nbr. 2, September 2016
- Vol. 17 Nbr. 1, March - March 2016
- Vol. 17 Nbr. 1, March - March 2016
- Vol. 16 Nbr. 2, September 2015
- Vol. 16 Nbr. 1, March - March 2015
- Vol. 16 Nbr. 1, March - March 2015
- Vol. 15 Nbr. 2, September - September 2014
- Vol. 15 Nbr. 2, September - September 2014
- Vol. 15 Nbr. 1, March - March 2014
Latest documents
- STANDING MATTERS: BRACKEEN, ARTICLE III, AND THE LURE OF THE MERITS.
- APPELLATE ISSUES IN AND AROUND INDIAN COUNTRY.
- AN UNEXPECTED CHALLENGE: THE CONSEQUENCE OF A LIMITED TRIBAL APPELLATE CASELOAD.
- OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA-REBALANCING FEDERAL-STATE-TRIBAL POWER.
- THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT AND INDIAN LAW: FROM INDIVIDUAL ADVOCACY TO COLLECTIVE ACTION.
- APPELLATE COURTS: STOP ACCEPTING AN 'ABSURD' FIRST AMENDMENT ANALYSIS FOR NATIVE NATIONS' SACRED SITE DESTRUCTION.
- READING AMERICAN INDIAN LAW.
- DICTIONARY DIVING IN THE COURTS: A SHAKY GRAB FOR ORDINARY MEANING.
- THE JOURNAL OF APPELLATE PRACTICE AND PROCESS.
- ALL MIXED UP ABOUT STATUTES: DISTINGUISHING INTERPRETATION FROM APPLICATION.
Featured documents
- DISRESPECTFUL DISSENT: JUSTICE SCALIA'S REGRETTABLE LEGACY OF INCIVILITY.
- "REMARKABLE INFLUENCE": THE UNEXPECTED IMPORTANCE OF JUSTICE SCALIA'S DECEPTIVELY UNANIMOUS AND CONTESTED MAJORITY OPINIONS.
- STANDING MATTERS: BRACKEEN, ARTICLE III, AND THE LURE OF THE MERITS.
- DICTIONARY DIVING IN THE COURTS: A SHAKY GRAB FOR ORDINARY MEANING.
- WHEN AN APPEAL GOES WRONG: A 'CRIMINAL JUSTICE NIGHTMARE'.
- IT'S 3 A.M.: DO YOU KNOW WHAT YOUR STAFF JUST POSTED? SOCIAL MEDIA ETHICS PITFALLS FOR APPELLATE LAWYERS AND JUDGES.
- THE ROBED TWEETER: TWO JUDGES' VIEWS ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT.
- LAWYERS AS PEACEMAKERS.
- U.S. SUPREME COURT BRIEF WRITING STYLE GUIDE.
- Deciding not to decide: a limited defense of the silent concurrence.