Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
- Publisher:
- University of Arizona
- Publication date:
- 2011-12-20
- ISBN:
- 1533-4724
- Copyright:
- COPYRIGHT TV Trade Media, Inc.<br/>COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Issue Number
- Vol. 23 No. 2, June 2023
- Vol. 23 No. 1, January 2023
- Vol. 22 No. 2, June 2022
- Vol. 22 No. 1, January 2022
- Vol. 21 No. 2, June 2021
- Vol. 21 No. 1, January 2021
- Vol. 20 No. 2, September 2019
- Vol. 20 No. 1, March 2019
- Vol. 19 No. 2, September 2018
- Vol. 19 No. 1, March 2018
- Vol. 18 No. 2, September 2017
- Vol. 18 No. 1, March 2017
- Vol. 17 No. 2, September 2016
- Vol. 17 No. 1, March - March 2016
- Vol. 16 No. 2, September 2015
- Vol. 16 No. 1, March - March 2015
- Vol. 15 No. 2, September - September 2014
- Vol. 15 No. 1, March - March 2014
- Vol. 14 No. 2, September 2013
- Vol. 14 No. 1, March - March 2013
Latest documents
- A SHORT & HAPPY GUIDE TO JUDICIAL CLERKSHIPS DELIVERS, ESPECIALLY THE HAPPY PART.
- THE (NOT TOO SERIOUS) GRAMMAR, PUNCTUATION, AND STYLE GUIDE TO LEGAL WRITING.
- THE JOURNAL OF APPELLATE PRACTICE AND PROCESS.
- A PORTRAIT OF TRIBAL COURTS: TRIBAL COURT TOOLS AND LEVERS TO ENSURE PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS FOR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS.
- THE CASE FOR TERMINATION OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES.
- REEXAMINING RECALL OF MANDATE: LIMITATIONS ON THE INHERENT POWER TO CHANGE FINAL JUDGMENTS.
- DOES QUALITY MATTER? THE INFLUENCE OF PARTY BRIEFS AND ORAL ARGUMENTS ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT.
- WHAT TRIAL JUDGES WANT (AND DON'T WANT) IN APPELLATE OPINIONS.
- SOME THOUGHTS ON REPLY BRIEFS.
- APPELLATE ISSUES IN AND AROUND INDIAN COUNTRY.
Featured documents
- "REMARKABLE INFLUENCE": THE UNEXPECTED IMPORTANCE OF JUSTICE SCALIA'S DECEPTIVELY UNANIMOUS AND CONTESTED MAJORITY OPINIONS.
- DISRESPECTFUL DISSENT: JUSTICE SCALIA'S REGRETTABLE LEGACY OF INCIVILITY.
- Extended vacancies, crushing caseloads, and emergency panels in the federal courts of appeals.
- STANDING MATTERS: BRACKEEN, ARTICLE III, AND THE LURE OF THE MERITS.
- IT'S 3 A.M.: DO YOU KNOW WHAT YOUR STAFF JUST POSTED? SOCIAL MEDIA ETHICS PITFALLS FOR APPELLATE LAWYERS AND JUDGES.
- OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA-REBALANCING FEDERAL-STATE-TRIBAL POWER.
- ALL MIXED UP ABOUT STATUTES: DISTINGUISHING INTERPRETATION FROM APPLICATION.
- SUPPLEMENTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING.
- MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT - OR NOT: APPELLATE JUDGES' PREFERENCES AND PET PEEVES ABOUT ORAL ARGUMENT.
- WHEN THE UNITED STATES LOSES IN A CRIMINAL CASE: THE GOVERNMENT APPEAL PROCESS.