No. 36-02, December 2012
Index
- Table of Contents
- Framing Address: a Framework for Analyzing Financial Market Transformation
- Rationales and Designs to Implement an Institutional Big Bang in the Governance of Global Finance
- The Governance and Disclosure of the Firm as an Enterprise Entity
- Making Money: Leverage and Private Sector Money Creation
- Central Bank-led Capitalism?
- Shareholders and Social Welfare
- Conceptions of Corporate Purpose in Post-crisis Financial Firms
- Banking and Competition in Exceptional Times
- The Market for Corporate Control: New Insights from the Financial Crisis in Ireland
- Limits of Disclosure
- The Future of Shareholder Democracy in the Shadow of the Financial Crisis
- The Long Road Back: Business Roundtable and the Future of Sec Rulemaking
- Financial Hospitals: Defending the Fed's Role as a Market Maker of Last Resort
- Toward a More Resilient Financial System?
- The Modern Corporation Magnified: Managerial Accountability in Financial-services Holding Companies
- The Financialization of the U.s. Corporation: What Has Been Lost, and How it Can Be Regained
- Shareholder Social Responsibility
- The Common Link in Failures and Scandals at the World's Leading Banks
- Corporate Governance as a School of Social Reform
- Revisiting "truth in Securities" Revisited: Abolishing Ipos and Harnessing Private Markets in the Public Good
- Hedge Funds and Risk Decoupling: the Empty Voting Problem in the European Union
- Equity Derivatives and the Challenge for Berle's Conception of Corporate Accountability
- Rebalancing Private Placement Regulation
- On the Rise of Shareholder Primacy, Signs of Its Fall, and the Return of Managerialism (in the Closet)
- Dinner Parties During "lost Decades": on the Difficulties of Rethinking Financial Markets, Fostering Elite Consensus, and Renewing Political Economy
- Who Wants to Watch? a Comment on the New International Paradigm of Financial Consumer Market Regulation
- Proposition 8 Is Unconstitutional, but Not Because the Ninth Circuit Said So: the Equal Protection Clause Does Not Support a Legal Distinction Between Denying the Right to Same-sex Marriage and Not Providing it in the First Place