Workplace and Non‐workplace Pro‐environmental Behaviors: Empirical Evidence from Florida City Governments

Published date01 May 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13003
AuthorKaifeng Yang,Aisha Azhar
Date01 May 2019
Workplace and Non-workplace Pro-environmental Behaviors: Empirical Evidence from Florida City Governments 399
Kaifeng Yang is a professor in the
School of Public Administration and Policy,
Renmin University of China and School of
Public Administration and Policy, Florida
State University. He has widely published on
public and performance management and
citizen participation.
E-mail: yangkaifeng@ruc.edu.cn
Aisha Azhar
University of Management and Technology, Lahore
Kaifeng Yang
Renmin University of China and Florida State University
Aisha Azhar is assistant professor in
the School of Governance and Society,
University of Management and Technology,
Lahore, Pakistan. She was a Fulbright
Scholar from Pakistan for her doctoral
studies at Florida State University.
Her research and teaching interests
include nonprofit management, public
management, disaster management,
public service motivation, and women’s
empowerment.
E-mail: aisha.azhar@umt.edu.pk
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 79, Iss. 3, pp. 399–410. © 2018 by
The American Society for Public Administration.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13003.
Workplace and Non-workplace Pro-environmental Behaviors:
Empirical Evidence from Florida City Governments
Abstract: Public employees are expected to be good stewards of public resources and engage in pro-environmental
behaviors (PEBs). Using different categorizations of PEBs, this article examines whether public employees
perform these PEBs in workplace and non-workplace settings. The article further investigates how PEBs are
influenced by salient characteristics of public organizations—that is, public service motivation (PSM) and civic
participation categorized as civic engagement and cognitive engagement. Data were collected through a survey
of public employees in two city governments in Florida. A structural equation model was employed to test the
proposed model. Findings indicate that PSM has a positive influence on workplace PEBs and similar PEBs in
the non-workplace settings. Civic engagement has a positive influence on both workplace and non-workplace
PEBs. Barriers significantly moderate the effects of PSM and cognitive engagement on workplace and non-
workplace PEBs.
Evidence for Practice
• Public employees with high levels of public service motivation and civic engagement are more likely to
perform environmentally friendly behaviors in both workplace and non-workplace settings.
• Appreciating and rewarding PEBs and minimizing value-action gaps to performing PEBs are strategies public
organizations can adopt in order to enhance pro-environmental outcomes.
• It is important to recognize employees’ potential to perform PEBs and encourage employees to participate in
civic engagement activities in their communities.
Sustainability or “going green” is one of the
most serious issues policy makers and public
administrators are concerned with in the present
era. While the issue of the environment has been
discussed in public administration scholarship from
various perspectives, such as policy diffusion and
adoption, economic development and management
capacity, less attention has been paid to its behavioral
aspects. Other social science disciplines have
examined the pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs)
of individuals as consumers, households, or citizens
(Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera 1987; Kollmuss and
Agyeman 2002; Steg and Vlek 2009; Stern 2000) and
of employees in private organizations (Graves and Sarkis
2011; Ramus 2002; Ramus and Steger 2000). However,
very few studies have examined the PEBs of public
employees. To date, Stritch and Christensen (2014) have
examined the link between PEBs and organizational
commitment and public service motivation, and Tsai,
Stritch, and Christensen (2016) have discussed the eco-
civic engagement of public employees.
Building on existing research from public
administration and other social science disciplines,
we examine the PEBs of public servants not only
as employees but also as individuals. Drawing on
past research, we classify PEBs into three types;
examine the influence of characteristics that are more
prevalent in public organizations, including public
service motivation (PSM) and civic participation;
and evaluate the role of barriers that inhibit public
employees’ PEBs, in order to better understand
individual employee participation in discretionary
PEBs in workplace and non-workplace settings.
This study conceives of public employees as individuals
who, regardless of their institutional directives or daily
life obstructions, are assumed to undertake PEBs by
their own will in both workplace and non-workplace
settings. Building on the value base of PEBs, this study
examines the public employee’s normative role as a
guardian of public resources, for whom protecting
environment becomes a higher expectation.
Notably, PSM and civic participation are not “unique”
to public employees; business employees have those
qualities, too. However, PSM and civic participation
characterize public servants more than private
Research Article
Address correspondence to: Kaifeng
Yang, School of Public Administration
and Policy, Renmin University of China,
Haidian District, Beijing, China, 100872.
E-mail:yangkaifeng@ruc.edu.cn

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT