Victimization Among Incarcerated Military Veterans: A Target Congruence Approach

Published date01 October 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/08874034231187303
AuthorMatthew W. Logan,Susan McNeeley
Date01 October 2023
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034231187303
Criminal Justice Policy Review
2023, Vol. 34(5) 419 –437
© The Author(s) 2023
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/08874034231187303
journals.sagepub.com/home/cjp
Article
Victimization Among
Incarcerated Military
Veterans: A Target
Congruence Approach
Matthew W. Logan1 and Susan McNeeley2
Abstract
Studies explicitly examining the antecedents of prison victimization are rare relative
to other institutional outcomes (e.g., misconduct) and are virtually nonexistent for
incarcerated military veterans. In the current study, we employed Firth regression
models to predict victimization among a subsample of military veterans housed by
the Minnesota Department of Corrections (MnDOC) using a target congruence
approach. Inconsistent with prior theory and research, we observed no differences
among veterans on the basis of race and physical or mental health disorders. We did,
however, observe a relationship between an individual’s risk of recidivism as measured
by the MnSTARR 2.0 and victimization whereby higher scores corresponded with
greater odds of victimization. Implications for theory and correctional policy are
discussed and directions for future research are given.
Keywords
prison, violence, correctional policy, military veterans
Personal safety is an omnipresent concern among those who live and work in prison.
Indeed, the deprivation of security and accompanying stressors are among the most
salient pains of imprisonment identified in the corrections literature (Steiner &
Wooldredge, 2021; Wooldredge, 2020) and are of primary interest to administrators
and staff whose goal is to promote order maintenance and security (Marquart &
1Texas State University, San Marcos, USA
2Minnesota Department of Corrections, Saint Paul, USA
Corresponding Author:
Matthew W. Logan, School of Criminal Justice & Criminology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX
78666, USA.
Email: mwl39@txstate.edu
1187303CJPXXX10.1177/08874034231187303Criminal Justice Policy ReviewLogan and McNeeley
research-article2023
420 Criminal Justice Policy Review 34(5)
Crouch, 1984). (In)security has been operationalized to include metrics of physical
victimization, although other forms (e.g., property-related) have been analyzed (Meade
et al., 2021; Struckman-Johnson & Struckman-Johnson, 2002; Wolff & Shi, 2009;
Wooldredge & Steiner, 2013, 2014). Prison victimization is not a uniform experience,
however, and studies have shown that some groups confer higher levels of risk than
others (McNeeley, 2022; Wooldredge & Steiner, 2012, 2016). One demographic that
has received limited empirical attention is military veterans.
This is an important oversight for at least three reasons. First, prior research has
indicated veterans tend to be at greater risk than the general population of experienc-
ing a variety of negative life outcomes that are relevant for studying prison adjustment.
Indeed, studies have found that they are more likely than nonveterans to be involved
in the criminal justice system, including the probability of arrest and subsequent incar-
ceration (Lucas et al., 2022). Results from population studies have also demonstrated
that military members are more prone to lifetime arrests relative to other demograph-
ics (Snowden et al., 2017) and research on the relative risk of imprisonment between
veterans and nonveterans has indicated that they are significantly more likely to be
incarcerated than their nonveteran peers (Greenberg & Rosenheck, 2012). Furthermore,
research has shown that increased criminal justice involvement among military veter-
ans is partly a function of the fact that they confer a higher risk of substance abuse
(Canada & Albright, 2014) and mental health disorder (Morgan et al., 2019) relative to
nonveterans, both of which are comorbid (Crum-Cianflone et al., 2016)—a point sub-
stantiated most recently by a systematic review on the most pressing criminogenic
risks for veterans, including antisocial behavior and substance abuse (Edwards et al.,
2023). Still, other studies have suggested that veteran status corresponds with higher
rates of lifetime trauma (Saxon et al., 2001) and greater risks of suicide while incarcer-
ated (Frisman & Griffin-Fennell, 2009; Wortzel et al., 2009).
Second, veterans constitute a notable proportion of the United States’ correctional
population. According to the most recent estimates from the Bureau of Justice Statistics,
there are between 100,000 and 180,000 veterans currently serving time in correctional
facilities (Bronson et al., 2015; Maruschak et al., 2021). Although these numbers are
proportional to their numbers in the community, the veterans in this report were more
than twice as likely to be incarcerated for violent and sexual offenses, relative to non-
veterans (26% vs. 12%). A spate of studies within the general penological literature
have further documented that the nature and severity of the offenses for which individu-
als are incarcerated are robust predictors of prison adjustment, including the initiation
and experience of serious institutional misconduct and victimization (Butler et al.,
2021; Kuanliang & Sorensen, 2008; Loucks & Zamble, 2001; McNeeley, 2022; Steiner
et al., 2014).
Third, research has shown that military veterans are not a monolithic group and
vary substantially from one another across several domains. Tens of thousands are
deployed overseas, yet many never serve in a warzone or experience combat; others
return from tours of duty having sustained some form of bodily harm or emotional
afflictions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury
(TBI) that negatively affect them over the life course (Booth-Kewley et al., 2010;

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT