Towards digital transformation: Lessons learned from traditional organizations
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2185 |
Published date | 01 March 2018 |
Author | Glenn Parry,Vikas Kumar,Sally Eaves,John Loonam |
Date | 01 March 2018 |
RESEARCH ARTICLE
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2185
Strategic Change. 2018;27(2):101–109. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jsc © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 101
Abstract
Digitally enabled organizaons are supported by new informaon and communicaon technolo‐
gies, referred to as digital technologies, which increasingly promise enormous opportunies for
growth. The study reviews 10 case studies from the literature and analysis the approaches these
organizaons have taken to successfully implement digital technologies. The ndings reveal a
conceptual framework that seeks to support management in understanding the acons required
to implement digital transformaon.
1
|
INTRODUCTION
Digitally enabled organizaons are supported by new informaon and
communicaon technologies (ICT), referred to as digital technologies,
which increasingly promise enormous opportunies for growth. These
new digital technologies embrace ICT systems such as virtualizaon,
mobility, and analycal systems and are integrated with back‐oce
ICT to provide a holisc view of the digital enterprise. Such iniaves
are referred to as digital transformaons, which require organizaons,
and respecve management, to signicantly reect on the process
of successful implementaon. Yet, history teaches us that the imple‐
mentaon of large‐scale ICT‐enabled change iniaves have a poor
rate of success across organizaons. Some studies, for example, cite
up to 90% failure rates for the implementaon of enterprise systems.
Yet, our empirical understanding of how organizaons implement
digital transformaon iniaves remains fragmented, with Hess, Ma,
Benlian, and Wiesböck, for example, nong that “recent work in aca‐
demia has been largely concerned with providing guidance on certain
aspects of digital transformaon” (2016, p. 124). Consequently, this
study seeks to explore the acons required when implemenng digital
transformaon within tradional organizaons.
The arcle reviews 10 digital transformaons from the case litera‐
ture and proposes a conceptual framework. The proposed framework
will support researchers in building an exploratory perspecve on the
topic of acons taken by leaders for digital transformaon implemen‐
taon, while providing praconers with a useful benchmarking tool
to checklist key criteria important to the successful implementaon
of digital transformaon. The arcle begins with a preliminary review
of the literature on organizaonal business models and digital trans‐
formaon iniaves. The arcle then discusses the methodological
approach to inquiry, which is followed by ndings and the proposi‐
on of a conceptual framework. The arcle concludes by drawing out
the key academic and managerial implicaons from this study before
briey nong the study limitaons and proposing suggesons for
future research inquiry.
2
|
ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS
MODELS
As this arcle seeks to explore the acons required by organizaons
that choose to digitally transform their organizaons, it is important
to provide a brief overview of the eect this emerging topic has on
respecve business models. According to Lambert and Davidson, who
reviewed empirical studies that used the business model construct
between 1996 and 2010, “there is no widely agreed upon denion
and composion of the business model concept” (2013, p. 668). For
example, they note that Weill and Vitale describe the business model
as a set of “roles and relaonships among a rms consumers, custom‐
ers, allies, and suppliers” (2002, p. 34), while Afuah notes that it “is a
set of acvies which a rm performs” (2004, p. 9), with Osterwalder
and Pigneur viewing it as a support “in arculang how the rm cre‐
ates and captures value” (2009, p. 14), and nally Zo and Amit view‐
ing the business model as a “system of interdependent acvies that
transcend the focal rm and spans its boundaries” (2010, p. 216).
Towards digital transformaon: Lessons learned from
tradional organizaons*
John Loonam1 | Sally Eaves2 | Vikas Kumar3 | Glenn Parry3
1 Business School, Dublin City University,
Dublin, Ireland
2 Said Business School, University of Oxford,
Oxford, United Kingdom
3 Faculty of Business & Law, University of the
West of England, London, United Kingdom
Correspondence
John Loonam, Dublin City University,
Dublin 9, Ireland.
Email: john.loonam@dcu.ie
* JEL classicaon codes: D83, L86, O33.
To continue reading
Request your trial