TheOAS and the OECD Move against Transnational Bribery: Implications for U.S. Businesses and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/0045-3609.00041
Date01 March 1999
Published date01 March 1999
AuthorFranklyn P. Salimbene
The OAS and the OECD Move
against Transnational Bribery:
Implications for U.S.
Businesses and the Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act
FRANKLYN P. SALIMBENE
The payment of bribes to foreign public officials in order to
obtain or retain business has been an issue of continuing
concern to the United States government and U.S. busi-
nesses. With the passage of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in
1977 (hereinafter FCPA),1which made it a crime for U.S. businesses
to engage in such activities, the United States began a solitary
struggle to enlist the support of other nations in the battle against
transnational bribery.2Yet, not until recently did these efforts begin
to achieve any demonstrable success. That success came with the
signing of the Inter-American Convention against Corruption in
1996, and the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public
Officials in International Business Transactions in 1997.
These treaties, which require signatory states to enact criminal
sanctions against those engaged in bribing foreign public officials,
will place the same legal restrictions on foreign businesses that
the FCPA has placed on U.S. businesses. They also will promote
fair and open competition in the awarding of international con-
tracts, competition not distorted by cronyism and corruption.
Because of this linkage between the treaties and the FCPA, and
because of their significance for U.S. businesses, this paper will:
(1) provide a brief review of the FCPA; (2) outline the significant
© 1999 Center for Business Ethics at Bentley College. Published by Blackwell Publishers,
350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA, and 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK.
Franklyn P. Salimbene is an adjunct assistant professor of law and a research fellow at the Center
for Business Ethics, Bentley College, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Business and Society Review 104:1 91–105

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT