The Role of Feedback Quality and Organizational Cynicism for Affective Commitment Through Leader–Member Exchange

DOI10.1177/0734371X20923010
Published date01 September 2021
AuthorMieke Audenaert,Beatrice Van der Heijden,Tine Van Thielen,Tim Rombaut
Date01 September 2021
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20923010
Review of Public Personnel Administration
2021, Vol. 41(3) 593 –615
© The Author(s) 2020
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0734371X20923010
journals.sagepub.com/home/rop
Article
The Role of Feedback Quality
and Organizational Cynicism
for Affective Commitment
Through Leader–Member
Exchange
Mieke Audenaert2, Beatrice Van der Heijden1,2,3,4,5,
Tim Rombaut6, and Tine Van Thielen2
Abstract
Affective commitment is crucial for employees to guarantee that they adhere to
organizational interests and goals, but not self-evident for street-level bureaucrats
who have a great deal of discretionary freedom in doing their work. Street-level
bureaucrats can deviate from organizational goals during the execution of custom-fit
solutions, and particularly so when they are cynical toward their organization. To
increase affective commitment among street-level bureaucrats, leaders may play an
important role by providing qualitative feedback and having a high-quality leader–
member exchange relationship with their team members. We examined the cross-
level interaction of leaders’ feedback quality and police officers’ organizational cynicism
in relation with affective commitment through Leader–Member eXchange (LMX).
Building on theorizing on human resource (HR) attributions and on the assumption
in social exchange theory that individuals engage in different reciprocation efforts, we
expected that police officers who are more cynical toward their organization would
be hesitant to reciprocate with more commitment to their organization when their
leader’s feedback quality is low. Our findings in a sample of 266 police officers nested
in 71 teams supported this expectation. Hence, this study contributes to a better
1Institute for Management Research, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
2Research group HRM and Organisational Behaviour, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
3Open University of The Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands
4University of Kingston, London, UK
5Hubei University, Wuhan, China
6Politiezone Meetjesland Centrum, Eeklo, Belgium
Corresponding Author:
Mieke Audenaert, Research group HRM and Organisational Behaviour, Department of Marketing,
Innovation and Organisation, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University,
Campus Tweekerken, Hoveniersberg 2, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Email: mieke.audenaert@ugent.be
923010ROPXXX10.1177/0734371X20923010Review of Public Personnel AdministrationAudenaert et al.
research-article2020
594 Review of Public Personnel Administration 41(3)
understanding of how to foster the affective commitment of employees who have
discretion in their work. Feedback quality appears to be crucial, both for LMX and
affective commitment, and this particularly for police officers who are more cynical
about their organization.
Keywords
feedback quality, LMX, affective commitment, organizational cynicism, street-level
bureaucrats, police officers
Introduction
In many public sector organizations, employees gain more and more discretion, and
their affective commitment may be threatened by teleworking (De Vries et al., 2019),
by knowledge work (Walsh, 2016), and by the changing employment relationship in
this sector (Audenaert et al., 2019a). This study seeks to enhance our understanding
about how to foster the affective commitment of street-level bureaucrats, being
employees in a public sector context who have a lot of discretion. In particular, this
study focuses on police organizations which are “street-level bureaucracies” that are
characterized by tight hierarchy, but in which police officers have a considerable dis-
cretion to act according to their personal priorities and beliefs (Lipsky, 1980). Although
discretion is functional for police officers to create custom-fit solutions in specific
situations, it might hinder the realization of organizational goals when police officers
choose not to act on behalf of their organization. Therefore, police managers seek to
enforce compliance of their staff with bureaucratic requirements and performance
standards (Cronin et al., 2017). This approach to managing employee performance is
questionable because it is impossible to prescribe procedures with sufficient detail for
every possible situation (Johnson, 2015).
An alternative approach police managers can take is to reinforce affective commit-
ment, which entails emotional attachment to the organization by identifying with the
organization, enjoying membership, and feeling involved (Meyer & Allen, 1991).
Police officers may be more willing to pursue the organizational interests and goals if
they feel and experience high levels of affective commitment (Van Gelderen & Bik,
2016). Earlier research indeed supports that affective commitment makes police offi-
cers adhere to ethical standards and engage less in deviant behaviors (Haarr, 1997).
However, empirical studies demonstrate that police officers’ commitment to the orga-
nization is vulnerable and typically declines with tenure (e.g., Beck & Wilson, 2000).
Thus, further enhancing our understanding of how to maintain and foster police offi-
cers’ affective commitment appears to be relevant for the overall human resource man-
agement (HRM) knowledge base regarding managing employees with significant
discretion. More specifically, this study can advance theory and research on perfor-
mance management practices for street-level bureaucrats.
Building on previous research, we have chosen to focus on the effectiveness of
police managers’ feedback quality for fostering affective commitment (e.g., Metcalfe

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT