The Netherlands

Pages315-338
315
Chapter X
THE NETHERLANDS
A. Sources and Basics of Antitrust Law in the Netherlands
As the Netherlands is a member state of the European Union, two
sets of competition rules apply: EU competition law and Dutch
competition law. The EU competition rules have been described in detail
in the EU Chapter above.1 This chapter focuses on domestic Dutch law.
The general rules of Dutch competition law are stated in the Dutch
Competition Act2 (Mededingingswet, CA), which came into force on
January 1, 1998. The enforcement of the CA is entrusted to the Dutch
Competition Authority (Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit, NMa),
which is based in The Hague and is under the responsibility of the Dutch
Minister of Economic Affairs.3
The CA was meant to be and has been significantly influenced by the
judgments of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the General Court
(GC) as well as the enforcement policy and individual decisions of the
European Commission (Commission). This influence is dynamic in the
sense that future developments in EU competition law will automatically
affect the interpretation of Dutch competition law.4 The CA explicitly
provides for the application of Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)5 by the NMa,6 and the Dutch
1. See supra Chapter VI (“The European Union”).
2. Dutch Competition Act, Act of 22 May 1997, Staatsblad van het
Koninkrijk der Nederlanden [Stb.] 1997, 242. Where this chapter refers
to Articles without citing a source, such reference is to the Competition
Act.
3. Id. art. 2.
4. Kamerstukken II, Explanatory Memorandum to the Competition Act
(Memorie van Toelichting), 1995–96, 24 707, No. 3 [hereinafter
Explanatory Memorandum].
5. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Sept. 5, 2008, 2008
O.J. (C 115) 47 as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon Amending the
Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European
Community, Dec. 13, 2007, 2007 O.J. (C 306) 1 [hereinafter Treaty of
Lisbon]. The texts of Articles 101 and 102 of the TFEU are identical to
316 Antitrust Issues in International IP Licensing Transactions
competition rules are neither more restrictive nor more liberal than EU
competition law.7
1. Agreements that Restrict Competition
Article 6 of the CA is almost identical to Article 101 of the TFEU
and prohibits agreements, decisions, and concerted practices between
undertakings and associations of undertakings whose object or effect is
to restrict competition within all or part of the Dutch market.8 Prohibited
agreements are automatically null and void, unless an exemption is
applicable.9 Exemptions are provided for on the same grounds as those
set forth in Article 101(3) TFEU.10 In line with EU competition law,
companies have to assess for themselves whether their agreements meet
the exemption criteria.
More specifically, EU block exemptions and individual exemptions
have direct effect in the Netherlands. 11 Parties to IP licensing
transactions should, therefore, consider the EU rules set forth in
Commission Regulation 772/2004 of April 27, 2004 on the application of
Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of technology transfer
agreements12 (TTBER) and the Commission Guidelines that supplement
the TTBER and assist in the evaluation pursuant to Article 101 of the
TFEU.13
Under the EU enforcement system, individual and block exemptions
are applicable as such; no transposition measures into Dutch law are
needed. However, by operation of Dutch competition law, EU block
exemptions are also applied to purely national situations in the
Netherlands (i.e., to business practices that do not affect interstate trade
the text of Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, which was amended and
renumbered by the Treaty of Lisbon effective December 1, 2009.
6. Competition Act, supra note 2, art. 88.
7. Explanatory Memorandum, supra note 4.
8. Competition Act, supra note 2, art. 6(1).
9. Id. art. 6(3). The exemptions are contained in Article 7 of the Act.
10. Id. art. 6(3)(1).
11. Id. arts. 12, 14.
12. Commission Regulation 772/2004 of April 27, 2004 on the Application
of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to Categories of Technology Transfer
Agreements, 2004 O.J. (L 123) 11 [hereinafter TTBER].
13. Guidelines on the Application of Art. 81 of the EC Treaty to Technology
Transfer Agreements, 2004 O.J. (C 101) 2 [hereinafter Guidelines].

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT