The Natural Environment

Published date01 May 1967
AuthorJoseph L. Fisher
DOI10.1177/000271626737100108
Date01 May 1967
Subject MatterArticles
127
The
Natural
Environment
By
JOSEPH
L.
FISHER
Joseph
L.
Fisher,
Ph.D.,
Arlington,
Virginia,
has
been,
since
1959,
President
of
Resources
for
the
Future,
Inc.,
where
he
was
Associate
Director
from
1953
to
1959.
From
1939
to
1943,
he
was
Planning
Technician,
U.S.
Natural
Resources
Planning
Board
and
(
1943
)
Economist,
U.S.
Department
of
State.
From
1947
to
1953,
he
was
Economist
and
Executive
Officer,
U.S.
Council
of
Economic
Advisers.
He
has
taught
at
Harvard
University,
Allegheny
College,
and
the
University
of
Colorado
and
is
a
member
of
the
American
Economic
Association,
the
American
Society
of
Public
Admin-
istration,
and
other
professional
organizations.
He
is
the
author
(
with
others
)
of
Resources
in
America’s
Future
(
1963
)
and
of
articles
in
various
scholarly
journals.
ABSTRACT:
In
the
United
States,
the
problem
of
sheer
quantity
of
raw
materials
has
given
way
in
importance
to
the
qualitative
problem
of
environmental
pollution.
On
the
quantitative
side,
physical
and
economic
indicators
and
goals
are
available,
but
on
the
qualitative
side,
such
goals
and
indi-
cators
are
more
difficult
to
conceive
and
work
with because
the
more
subjective
problems
of
individual
and
social
welfare
must
be
taken
into
account.
As
exemplified
by
the
water-
quality
studies
of
the
Delaware
Estuary,
probably
the
basic
indicator
for
social
welfare
would
be
the
net
social
benefits
(minus
costs
or
losses
in
some
sense)
that
would
result
from
various
selected
measures
to
deal
with
a
specific
problem.
Where
estimates
of
benefits
seem
impossible,
a
second-best
objective
would
be
minimizing
the
social
costs
of
selected
measures.
In
view
of
the
interrelatedness
of
environmental
pollution
problems,
the
concept
of
the
"environmental
problem
shed"
has
been
suggested—taking
into
account
the
various
interrelated
physical
and
social
problems
and
indicators
within
a
given
area.
Research
is
also
needed
on
the
processes
by
which
environmental
quality
standards
and
programs
are
reached,
the
direction
and
rates
of
change
for
which
statistical
indicators
are
necessary,
and
to
create
and
improve
the
indi-
cators
of
trends
in
environmental
pollution
and
its
effects
on
people.—Ed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT