The Interplay of Gender and Ethics in Corporate Offending Decision-Making

Published date01 August 2013
Date01 August 2013
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/1043986213496379
Subject MatterArticles
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice
29(3) 385 –398
© 2013 SAGE Publications
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1043986213496379
ccj.sagepub.com
Article
The Interplay of Gender
and Ethics in Corporate
Offending Decision-Making
Nicole Leeper Piquero1, Lynne M. Vieraitis1, Alex
R. Piquero1, Stephen G. Tibbetts2 and Michael
Blankenship (deceased)3
Abstract
There is a growing knowledge base on the factors associated with white-collar
and corporate offending decisions. Limitations to this line of research include the
lack of attention paid to moral and ethical considerations in decision-making and
the need to better understand potential gender differences in the processes and
outcomes of corporate offending. This paper uses data from a sample of adult MBA
students to explore the interplay between ethics, gender, and corporate offending
decisions. Results show that women are more likely to believe that corporations
need regulation (i.e., women are more ethical) and that they are less likely to report
affirmative offending intentions. Additionally, women are over two times more likely
than men to report lower offending intentions and higher ethics. Implications for
theoretical work on gender and organizations generally as well as within corporate
crime contexts in particular are outlined.
Keywords
ethics, corporate, offending, gender
Introduction
Gender is one of the strongest correlates of crime. While the gender gap is small for
some minor offenses and for alcohol and drug use, men almost always outperform
1University of Texas at Dallas, TX, USA
2California State University San Bernardino, CA, USA
3Boise State University, ID, USA
Corresponding Author:
Nicole Leeper Piquero, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W Campbell Rd GR 31, Richardson, TX
75080, USA.
Email: npiquero@utdallas.edu
496379CCJ29310.1177/1043986213496379Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice X(X)Piquero et al.
research-article2013

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT