The Enforcement of Child Labor Laws

AuthorE.N. Clopper
Published date01 January 1916
Date01 January 1916
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/000271621606300125
Subject MatterArticles
272
THE
ENFORCEMENT
OF
CHILD
LABOR
LAWS
BY
E.
N.
CLOPPER,
PH.D.,
Secretary
for
Northern
States,
National
Child
Labor
Committee,
New
York
City.
The
National
Child
Labor
Committee
has
renewed
its
cam-
paign
in
behalf
of
the
federal
child
labor
bill,
which
will
go
before
the
sixty-fifth
Congress
enjoying
the
prestige
of
its
overwhelming
endorsement
by
the
last
House.
It
provides
four
standards
already
quite
generally
recognized
by
the
individual
states:
(1)
an
age
limit
of
fourteen
years
for
employment
in
mills,
canneries,
workshops
and
factories;
(2)
a
minimum
work
day
of
eight
hours
for
children
between
fourteen
and
sixteen
in
such
establishments;
(3)
the
prohibition
of
work
at
night
in
such
places
on
the
part
of
children
between
these
ages;
and
(4)
an
age
limit
of
sixteen
years
for
employment
in
mines
and
quarries.
The
power
of
Congress
to
regulate
commerce
among
the
states
is
invoked
with
the
object
of
imposing
these
standards
upon
manufacturers
and
mine
oper-
ators
who
ship
their
products
from
state
to
state-a
provision
vir-
tually
all-inclusive.
For
those
who
refuse
to
meet
these
require-
ments,
suitable
penalties
in
the
form
of
fines
or
imprisonment
are
provided.
At
present
twenty-seven
of
the
states
have
the
first
standard
already
written
in
their
laws
without
weakening
exemptions,
while
seventeen
others
have
adopted
it
in
principle
but
permit
a
lower
standard
under
certain
conditions.
Eighteen
states
rigidly
require
the
second
standard,
while
four
others
make
exceptions.
The
third
standard
is
widely
recognized,
as
no
fewer
than
thirty-
three
states
insist
upon
this
elementary
provision
for
the
protection
of
working
children,
and
five
others
have
adopted
it
with
ex-
emptions.
The
fourth
standard
affects
only
those
states
with
mining
or
quarrying
industries,
and
has
been
incorporated
in
the
laws
of
twenty-two,
three
of
these,
however,
authorizing
departures
from
its
observance.
Hence
it
is
clear
that
the
federal
bill
does
not
seek
to
force
new
and
untried
restrictions
upon
the
employers
of
the
country,
but,
on
the
contrary,
is
intended
simply
to
establish
firmly
and
apply

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT