The Endless Appeal to Rethink Public Administration

AuthorDonijo Robbins
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12694
Published date01 January 2017
Date01 January 2017
146 Public Administration Review • January | February 2017
The Endless Appeal to Rethink Public Administration
Donijo Robbins is full professor with
the School of Public, Nonprofit, and Health
Administration at Grand Valley State
University in Grand Rapids, Michigan,
and is former elected comptroller for the
City of Grand Rapids. She holds an MA in
economics and PhD in public administration
from Rutgers University-Newark. Her
research focuses on public budgeting and
financial management.
E-mail: robbinsd@gvsu.edu R ichard Clay Wilson, Jr. joins copious others
calling on academics and practitioners to
rethink public administration. His second
edition of Rethinking Public Administration: The Case
for Management provides an overview of “management
deficiencies that characterize the public sector” (1)
and argues that these deficiencies demonstrate how
critically important management is to the success of
government at all levels. “Government is duty-bound
to perform capably and cost-effectively” but numerous
obstacles constrain managers.
What gets in the way of management? Simply, people
get in the way. Wilson suggests that we do not think
about management enough, and when we do think
about it at macro and micro levels, we do so the
wrong way. Wilson s vie w is that management is the
ability to use available resources to produce the best
possible outcomes (123); “management is about
money and the values related to money such as cost-
effectiveness” (88). Besides the wrong way of thinking,
Wilson suggests politics, systems and structures,
graduate programs in public administration, and
Danny L. Balfour and Stephanie P. Newbold, Editors
Donijo Robbins
Grand Valley State University
Richard Clay Wilson, Jr ., Rethinking Public
Administration:  e Case for Management
(Irvine, CA: Melvin & Leigh, Publishers, 2016).
158 pp. ISBN: 9780978663841 .
ineffective communication skills are management
deficiencies.
In the first chapter, Political Territory, Wilson
showcases how politicians and everything that comes
from them—political appointees, policies, and
elections—disrupt a manager s ability to manage.
Politicians do not solve problems or manage,
instead, Wilson suggests, their job description is to
know how to speak well and respond to the current
political climate so to get reelected. Managers have
to implement and manage the policies made by
the politicians in offices often headed by political
appointees. Moreover, political appointees prevail over
the unsung professionals. “The career public sector
managers are rarely ever noted” when government
succeeds or fails (par. 2–3). Overall, political
values trump managerial values—“The concerns of
politicians accurately reflect the concerns of the public
and managerial values are not among them” (108).
However, toward the end of the chapter, Wilson
acknowledges that not everything is political and that
the “great majority of managerial issues in government
do not invoke politics” (43).
Furthermore, he suggests that graduate programs in
public administration should do for governments
what business schools do for the private sector.
Management works in the private sector because
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 77, Iss. 1, pp. 146–148. © 2016 by
The American Society for Public Administration.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.12694.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT