The Effects of Procedural Justice on Obligation to Obey, and Compliance among Incarcerated Offenders in South Africa
Author | Paul Oluwatosin Bello,Thabiso Donald Matshaba |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1177/00328855221136197 |
Published date | 01 December 2022 |
Date | 01 December 2022 |
Subject Matter | Articles |
The Effects of Procedural
Justice on Obligation to
Obey, and Compliance
among Incarcerated
Offenders in South Africa
Paul Oluwatosin Bello
1
and Thabiso Donald Matshaba
1
Abstract
This study explores the impacts of procedural justice on incarcerated offend-
ers’obligationto obey, and compliance with correctional rules and procedures
in selected South African correctional centers. The Tylerian process-based
regulation model holds that compliance with legal authorities is contingent
upon some normative and instrumental factors. While these factors have
been considered to shape compliance among inmates in correctional centers
in Western societies, there is a dearth of research on compliance behavior
among incarcerated offenders in correctional centers in transitional African
societies, including South Africa. A cross-sectional survey of participants
from selected correctional centers in South Africa assessed the effect of pro-
cedural justice and other exogenous elements on inmates’obligation to obey
and comply with correctional rules and procedures. The findings indicate,
among others, that inmates who assessed correctional officials as procedurally
just or fair were more likely to obey and comply with correctional rules and
procedures. The implications of the findings for the effective management of
incarcerated offenders are discussed.
1
University of South Africa (UNISA), Pretoria, South Africa
Corresponding Author:
Paul Oluwatosin Bello, Department of Corrections Management, School of Criminal Justice,
College of Law (CLAW), University of South Africa (UNISA), Pretoria, South Africa.
Email: bellopo@unisa.ac.za
Article
The Prison Journal
2022, Vol. 102(6) 673–693
© 2022 SAGE Publications
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/00328855221136197
journals.sagepub.com/home/tpj
Keywords
compliance, inmates, procedural justice, South Africa
Introduction
The importance of order in the effective management of correctional institu-
tions has been widely reported in literature (Meško & Hacin, 2019; Maguire
et al., 2019; Useem & Piehl, 2006; Reisig, 2001; Logan, 1993). Correctional
administrators usually rely on inmates’compliance for order to be maintained
and sustained in the corrections environment (Jackson et al., 2010; Maguire
et al., 2019). Although most correctional institutions have conventional mech-
anisms for maintaining order and enforcing compliance, they are typically
coercive, or a combination of formal sanctions and rewards. However,
these approaches have been found to be ineffective, and research does not
give much credence to them (Nuño & Morrow, 2020; Bottoms, 1999;
Reisig 1998; Sparks et al., 1996). In fact, a coercive approach to order main-
tenance in correctional environments has been found to breed hostility
between inmates and correctional officials, as well as deepening the social dis-
tance between them (Meško & Hacin, 2019).
Contrastingly, research has shown that a normative approach that is pre-
mised on impartial and fair use of authority may be appropriate in gaining
compliance and in achieving order in custodial institutions (Maguire et al.,
2019). A normative approach exemplifies the procedures, daily attitude, or
behavior of correctional officials towards incarcerated offenders in the custo-
dial environment in terms of how they treat inmates. Fair treatment or conduct
is widely reported to promote inmates’perceived obligation to obey correc-
tional officials (which is a proxy element of legitimacy), and in turn promotes
voluntary compliance (Campbell et al., 2020; Sparks & Bottoms, 1995).
Studies have also documented that fairorimpartialtreatment,moresothan
instrumental factors,is a strong predictorof compliance behavior in correctional
settings (Liebling, 2011). There is substantial evidence to suggest that correc-
tional officials who are courteous or well-disposed usually have a valuable
and sustained professional working relationship with inmates and, by extension,
treat inmates in a procedurally fair manner (Campbell et al., 2020; Maguire et al.,
2019). Beyond helping to create a healthy and safe custodial environment, such
gestures and practices often stimulate inmates’willingness to obey correctional
officials, as well as their voluntary compliance with correctional rules and pro-
cedures (Beijersbergen et al., 2015).
It would be impracticable for correctional officials to execute their duties
and maintain order in the corrections environment without corresponding
674 The Prison Journal 102(6)
To continue reading
Request your trial