The Dynamic Capabilities of Meta‐Multinationals

AuthorDavid J. Teece,Sohvi Leih,Donald Lessard
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1126
Published date01 August 2016
Date01 August 2016
THE DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES OF META-
MULTINATIONALS
DONALD LESSARD,
1
DAVID J. TEECE,
2
and SOHVI LEIH
2
*
1
MIT Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A
2
Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California
U.S.A
Plain language summary: Tod ay s multinational enterprises (MNEs) exhibit characteris-
tics that have not been discussed very much in previous studies. They are stateless in the
sense that operations are spread across nations, but also maintain some central authority.
We ca ll suc h MNE s meta-MNEsand analyze them using the Dynamic Capabilities frame-
work, a key framework in strategic management. We find that the capability of MNEs to
shape and adapt to changing environments is necessary for the emergence and success
of the meta-MNE. We also discuss prospects for meta-MNEs in the context of China.
Technical summary: Established theories of the multinational enterprise (MNE) were
created for a different, less globally competitive world. Todays MNEs are movingtoward
the stateless ideal type knownas a metanational. Because considerablecentral authority
remains, we call the emerging model the meta-MNE and use the Dynamic Capabilities
framework to analyze this phenomenon. Strong dynamic capabilities, including asset
orchestration, are necessary bothfor the very existence of the meta-MNEand for sustain-
ing its competitive advantage. We draw contrasts between the meta-MNE and the
traditional, home-centric MNE. We consider the ways in which nations still matter and
the policy implications of the emergence of the meta-MNE. We also discuss recent
developments in China that have greatly shaped the environment facing existing and
future meta-MNEs. Copyright © 2016 Strategic Management Society.
INTRODUCTION
The multinational enterprise (MNE) is one of the
worlds most innovative organizational forms,
morphing from the globe-spanning trade of the Dutch
East India Company(founded in 1602) and the British
East India Company (in 1603) to todayssprawling
networks of factories, offices, and research labs that
connect cities and regions throughout the world.
MNEs are the handmaiden of globalization, and their
stakeholders are among globalizations largest
beneficiaries.
Todays MNEs are, in fact, getting closer and
closer to yet a new organizational form, that of the
metanational, which was first described by Doz,
Santos, and Williamson (2001). The metanational
can be based anywhere, but is able to sense and
mobilize knowledge from leading customers and,
especially, fromkey industry-specific centers of inno-
vation anywhere in the world.
Home/host country dichotomies live on, but the
distinction should no longer be emphasized as
strongly as in most theoretical frameworks.
Know-how and markets have become more widely
dispersed and diversified, and the structures of
Keywords: dynamic capabilities; meta-multinationals; location
and capability development; competitive advantage; theory of
the MNE
*Correspondence to: Sohvi Leih, Haas School of Business, University
of California at Berkeley, 2220 Piedmont Avenue, Berkeley, CA
94720-1900, U.S.A. E-mail: sleih@berkeley.edu
Global Strategy Journal
Global StrategyJournal, 6:211224 (2016)
Published onlinein Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).DOI: 10.1002/gsj.1126
Copyright © 2016 Strategic Management Society

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT