The CEO as a key microfoundation of global strategy: Task demands, CEO origin, and the CEO's international background
Published date | 01 February 2019 |
Author | Albert A. Cannella,Sven Kunisch,Markus Menz |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1184 |
Date | 01 February 2019 |
SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE
The CEO as a key microfoundation of global
strategy: Task demands, CEO origin, and the
CEO’s international background
Sven Kunisch
1
| Markus Menz
2
| Albert A. Cannella Jr.
3
1
Institute of Management, School of Management,
University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
2
Institute of Management, Geneva School of
Economics and Management, University of
Geneva, Genève, Switzerland
3
Department of Management, Mays Business
School, Texas A&M University, College Station,
Texas
Correspondence
Sven Kunisch, School of Management, University
of St. Gallen, Dufourstrasse 40a, 9000 St. Gallen,
Switzerland.
Email: sven.kunisch@unisg.ch
Research Summary: We explore the selection of new
CEOs with international backgrounds as a key micro-
foundation of global strategy. Building on executive suc-
cession, upper echelons, and international business
research, we argue that firms choose CEOs with interna-
tional backgrounds to match their task demands. We fur-
ther argue that depending on the CEO’s origin from
inside or outside the firm, different task demands matter.
Specifically, we propose that the relationship between
internal (firm-level) task demands and the new CEO’s
international background is more pronounced for inside
successions, whereas the relationship between external
(industry-level) task demands and the new CEO’s interna-
tional background is more pronounced for outside succes-
sions. An analysis of a sample of 363 CEO successions
in S&P 500 firms supports our reasoning.
Managerial Summary: Choosing a CEO with the
“right”experience is a crucial concern for many large
firms. While firms increasing seem to select new CEOs
with international backgrounds, not all firms do so. In
this article, we explore several factors that might influ-
ence this choice. Our results reveal that the predecessor’s
international background, the firm’s level of international-
ization, and the level of internationalization of the firm’s
industry influence whether a CEO with an international
background is selected. Moreover, while for inside suc-
cessions, the firm’s level of internationalization is particu-
larly important, for outside successions, the level of
internationalization of the firm’s industry is particularly
important. Our findings inform those who search, select,
and appoint new CEOs, including boards of directors and
(executive search) consultants.
Received: 31 May 2016 Revised: 24 February 2017 Accepted: 22 August 2017
DOI: 10.1002/gsj.1184
Copyright © 2017 Strategic Management Society
Global Strategy Journal. 2019;9:19–41. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/gsj 19
KEYWORDS
CEO succession, global strategy, international
background, microfoundations, upper echelons
1|INTRODUCTION
A crucial concern in global strategy research centers on CEO decisions and actions related to global
operations and competitiveness. These decisions and actions may differ substantially based on the
CEO’s international experience (e.g., Felin, Foss, & Ployhart, 2015; Foss & Pedersen, 2014; Ham-
brick & Mason, 1984). Yet, while scholars have extensively studied a variety of CEO characteristics
(for excellent reviews, see Berns & Klarner, 2017; Busenbark, Krause, Boivie, & Graffin, 2016; Fin-
kelstein, Hambrick, & Cannella, 2009; Giambatista, Rowe, & Riaz, 2005; Kesner & Sebora, 1994),
comparably little is known about the CEO’s international background.
The relatively limited scholarly attention to the CEO’s international background is in sharp con-
trast to the rising importance of this phenomenon (e.g., Favaro, Karlsson, & Neilson, 2013; Karls-
son & Neilson, 2009; Unknown, 2014; Russell Reynolds Associates, 2010; Unruh & Cabrera,
2013). On the one hand, large firms often seem to select new CEOs with international backgrounds.
While in 2002 only 21% of the CEOs of the S&P 500 had international experience (Warner, 2005),
in 2008, 52% of CEOs had international experience, such as spending significant time abroad on an
assignment with substantial responsibilities (Karlsson & Neilson, 2009). According to the leading
executive search firm Spencer Stuart, U.S. firms regard international experience and global perspec-
tive as key requirements for newly appointed CEOs (cf. Unknown, 2004). On the other hand, not all
firms choose new CEOs with international backgrounds. In fact, a recent global CEO succession
study claims that the “newest CEOs have neither the diversity nor the global backgrounds that you
might expect”(Favaro et al., 2013, p. 2). This suggests that either the firms do not find the appropri-
ate candidates inside or outside the firm or they do not value the respective experiences because it is
unclear what exactly the merits are.
Notwithstanding, a new CEO’s international experience appears to be highly relevant as a micro-
foundation of global strategy. The few studies that have explored CEOs’international backgrounds
have focused on the consequences (Carpenter, Sanders, & Gregersen, 2001; Daily, Certo, & Dalton,
2000; Herrmann, 2002; Herrmann & Datta, 2002, 2006; Roth, 1995). Although the knowledge is
not conclusive, collectively these studies suggest that a new CEO’s international experience can
have important consequences. Yet, with the exception of one study by Daily et al. (2000), we lack
studies that go beyond the performance consequences and that provide insights about when and why
firms actually select CEOs with international backgrounds and whether they come from inside or
outside the firm.
Our study is designed to advance knowledge about the role of CEO international background as
a key microfoundation of global strategy. We examine when firms actually select CEOs with inter-
national backgrounds and whether the new CEO’s origin as a key contextual factor impacts that
choice. To proceed, we draw on research from the areas of executive succession, upper echelons,
and international business. We argue that firms appoint CEOs with international experience because
such experience is necessary to effectively handle the managerial task demands associated with the
firm’s internal and external contexts. Combining insights from research on the CEO’s task demands
and the new CEO’s origin, we then propose that firm-related task demands (the firm’s internal
20 KUNISCH ET AL.
To continue reading
Request your trial