The belonging model of trust

AuthorKelly A. Delaney‐Klinger,Joshua R. Knapp,Therese A. Sprinkle,Michael J. Urick
Published date01 September 2019
Date01 September 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21370
RESEARCH ARTICLE
The belonging model of trust
Joshua R. Knapp
1
| Therese A. Sprinkle
2
| Michael J. Urick
3
|
Kelly A. Delaney-Klinger
1
1
Management Department, College of
Business and Economics, University of
Wisconsin-Whitewater, Whitewater,
Wisconsin
2
Healthcare Management & Organizational
Leadership Department, Lender School of
Business, Quinnipiac University, Hamden,
Connecticut
3
Business Department, Alex G. McKenna
School of Business, Economics, and
Government, Saint Vincent College,
Latrobe, Pennsylvania
Correspondence
Joshua R. Knapp, University of Wisconsin-
Whitewater, College of Business and
Economics, 809 W. Starin Road,
Whitewater, WI 53190-1790.
Email: knappjr@uww.edu
Abstract
Although we know that high-quality employee
organization relationships are beneficial, these relation-
ships are complex and not fully understood, especially
among employees of nonprofit organizations. In particular,
we know little about how these employees perceive trust,
which may overlook an important contributor to effective
management. We begin to address this issue by testing a
new theoretical model that conceptualizes perceived
insider status, psychological ownership, and organiza-
tional identification as foundations for the perception of
justice and subsequent trust. Our results indicate that psy-
chological ownership and perceived insider status relate to
trust through procedural and interpersonal justice. These
results contrast those typically found in for-profit contexts
in that organizational identification did not predict justice
and that distributive and informational justice did not pre-
dict trust.
KEYWORDS
justice, organizational identification, perceived insider status,
psychological ownership, trust
1|INTRODUCTION
A growing body of research examines the nature and importance of trust (i.e., the willingness to be
vulnerable to another party without fear of being taken advantage of, Mayer, Davis, & Schoorman,
1995; Rousseau, Sitkin, Burt, & Camerer, 1998) for nonprofit organizations. Researchers have exam-
ined how trust relates to financial donations (e.g., Alhidari, Veludo-de-Oliveira, Yousafzai, & Yani-
de-Soriano, 2018; Hager & Hedberg, 2016; Hou, Zhang, & King, 2017; Tremblay-Boire & Prakash,
Received: 28 August 2018 Revised: 5 May 2019 Accepted: 6 May 2019
DOI: 10.1002/nml.21370
Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 2019;30:133153. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/nml © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 133
2017), volunteerism (e.g., Siisiäinen & Kankainen, 2015; Taniguchi & Marshall, 2014), inter-
organizational collaboration (e.g., Bunger, 2013), and client attitudes (e.g., Hoogervorst, Metz,
Roza, & van Baren, 2016). Interestingly, much of this body of research is externally focused in that
either the trustee or the trustor typically exists primarily outside of the nonprofit organization itself.
There are some examples of research examining internal nonprofit employees and trust in their
organizations. For example, Zeffane and Bani Melhem (2017) found nonprofit employees in the
United Arab Emirates to be more trusting of their workplaces than for-profit employees. Similarly,
employee trust in management of nonprofits can be higher partly because of better communication
and manager fairness (Mirvis, 1992). In addition, Handy and Katz (1998) suggest that nonprofit
employees' trust is exemplified by self-selection into nonprofit roles despite sometimes receiving
lower pay. Yet these kinds of studies remain scarce and do not extensively examine trust formation
among nonprofit employees, and this body of work continues to be incomplete even though the topic
was identified as a critical concern over 25 years ago (Mirvis, 1992).
This research gap is unfortunate because nonprofit employees represent a large portion of the
overall workforce (7.4% globally, Salamon, Sokowski, Haddock, & Tice, 2013; 11.9% in the United
States, Salamon, 2018), and there are many well-documented benefits of employee trust identified in
for-profit contexts, such as improved attitudes, citizenship, individual performance (Dirks & Ferrin,
2001), cooperation (Balliet & Van Lange, 2013), knowledge sharing, and team performance (P. Lee,
Gillespie, Mann, & Wearing, 2010). To this end, we develop and test a new theoretical model (See
Figure 1) that conceptualizes how trusting nonprofit employeeorganization relationships can be
facilitated by a meaningful sense of belonging.
To explain, the perception of belonging within an organization can be founded on a sense of psy-
chological ownership (PO), perceived insider status (PIS), and/or organizational identification (OID)
Interpersonal
Justice
(Time 2)
Procedural
Justice
(Time 2)
Informational
Justice
(Time 2)
Distributive
Justice
(Time 2)
Trust
(Time 2)
Standardized path coefcients shown. ** p < .01 * p < .05
Residuals of Justice Measures Allowed to Covary
Psychological
Ownership
(Time 1)
Perceived
Insider Status
(Time 1)
Organizational
Identication
(Time 1)
-.11ns
.66**
.36**
-.11ns
.17**
FIGURE 1 Resultsfor the belonging model of trust
134 KNAPP ET AL.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT