The Administrative Career of Dr. W. W. Stockberger

AuthorEldon L. Johnson
Published date01 June 1988
Date01 June 1988
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/009102608801700201
Subject MatterArticle
The
Administrative
Career
of
Dr. W. W.
Stockberger
by
Eldon
L.
Johnson
The
following
article is reprinted
from
Volume I, no. 1,
llie
Autumn 1940 issue of
Public
Administration
Review,
rh/s article is reproduced
to commemorate f/ie accomplisiiments of Dr.
Warner
W. Stocl a pioneer and leader in f/ie
field
of federal personnel administration.
Readers
may recognize Dr. Stocklierger as the individual for whom
IPMA's
highest honor award is named, and as the
first
director of
personnel for the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Among his many other accomplishments, Dr. Stockberger served as the
first
president of
the Society for Personnel Administration. This article was
written
by Eldon L.
Johnson,
formerly
editor
of
Public
Administration
Review,
and
administrator of the Graduate School of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. We thank him for allowing us to
reprint
this
article as a
tribute
to the achievements of Dr. Stockberger.
I
n
the
history
of
personnel administration
in the
federal government,
no
name
is
more important than that
of
Dr. Warner
W.
Stockberger, former Director
of
Per-
sonnel
of
the United States Department of Agriculture. When President Roosevelt
issued
his
Executive Order
of
June
24, 1938,
requiring that
all
federal departments
and certain independent agencies establish personnel divisions, headed
by
personnel
directors.
Dr.
Stockberger
had
already completed thirteen years
of
service
in
such
a
position.
The
example
set by his
years
of
pioneering effort undoubtedly
had
much
to
do both with
the
issuance
and
with
the
effectuation
of the
order.
In
making
its
personnel recommendations,
the
President's Committee
on
Administrative Manage-
ment
had
given special attention
to the
personnel organization
and
program
in the
Department of Agriculture.
In
carrying
out the
terms of the Order, many departments
and agencies found
the
Office
of
Personnel
of
Agriculture
a
valuable depository
of
personnel information
and
experience.
In
examining applicants
for the new
positions
of Director
and
Assistant Director
of
Personnel,
the
Civil Service Commission sought
the advice
of
Dr. Stockberger
and
later appointed
him a
member
of
the oral-interview
board.
Dr.
Stockberger enjoys
the
distinction
of
being
the
first important figure
in the
federal personnel field.
For
approximately
two
decades
he has
directed
the
personnel
program
or
assisted
in
formulating
the
personnel policies
of
one
of
the largest federal
departments.
To
those
who
know
him
professionally,
he is an
extraordinary public
servant.
To
those
who
know
him
personally,
he is
also
an
admirable individual
and
a kindly philosopher.
In
personnel circles
in
Washington
he is
often referred
to as
the "dean
of
personnel administrators." When
the
Society
for
Personnel Adminstra-
tion
was
organized
in 1937, he was
unanimously elected charter president; when
he
retired from
the
position,
he was
unanimously elected president emeritus
in
recog-
nition
of his
"distinguished service
and
inspiring leadership." Students
of
public
administration invariably cite
his
career
as a
brilliant example
of the
specialist,
the
Public
Personnel Management
Vol.
17,
No. 2
(Summer
1988) 91
scientist in this case, who succeeded as an administrator in a genered staff capacity.
An examination of his career will throw some light on the reeisons for that successful
transformation; but first it is necessary to understand the setting in which the trans-
formation took place.
THE
BACKGROUND
Like many other auxiliary services, personnel functions in the federal government
were until recently dealt with as an undifferentiated part of management. The Civil
Service Act of 1883 and the Retirement Act of 1920 established a central personnel
agency and made it responsible for taking hold of the personnel problem from both
ends,
initial employment and final retirement; but the vast and significant gap be-
tween was still left to the operating departments, not so much by design as by default.
The most significant phase of personnel administration, that which involves human
relations, morale, and the maximum utilization of human resources after recruit-
ment, was left untouched. It was, nevertheless, an inescapable part of departmental
management. It could receive special attention by special persons or it could be dealt
with in the normal course of managerial events, largely according to the pressure of
circumstances. Most of the old-line departments did not establish personnel offices,
except for record-keeping purposes, until required to do so by the Executive Order of
June 24, 1938. The most notable exception was the Department of Agriculture.
Until 1923 the history of personnel administration in the Department of Agricul-
ture was substantially the same as in all other federal departments. There was a
time when all appointments and salary adjustments received the personal attention
of the Secretary. As the Department grew, this function became too burdensome. The
organic act of 1889 provided for a chief clerk with genersd supervision over the clerical
personnel. Two years later, in 1891, an appointment clerk was named to keep essen-
tial personnel records. This was the first "personnel officer" in the Department and
the beginning of the first over-all department treatment of personnel, except through
the Secretary personally. Soon after the turn of the century another personnel agency
was created—a committee on personnel. Probably because it was primarily concerned
with important disciplinary cases, it was headed by the Solicitor. With the existence
of the chief clerk, the appointment clerk, and the disciplinary committee, personnel
administration was diffused among three agencies soon after Warner W. Stockberger
entered the Department in 1903 as a young scientist.
For 32 years, from 1891 to 1923, the appointment clerk was the center of all de-
partmental personnel functions. Toward the end of the period he assumed the more
imposing title of Chief Personnel Officer, and his office came to be known as the
Office of Personnel. The function did not change, however, except in quantity, until
the passage of the Retirement Act of 1920, which made the determination of the
length of service and the rates of pay of each employee of primary importance in the
calculation of retirement annuities. Not until the passage of the Classification Act
of 1923 was there a major move in the direction of expanding the personnel functions
or strengthening central responsibility for them.
92 Public Personnel Management
Vol.
17, No. 2
(Summer
1988)

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT