Tensions and Challenges in the Management of Diversity and Inclusion in IT Services Multinationals in India

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21654
Published date01 March 2015
Date01 March 2015
AuthorRory Donnelly
Human Resource Management, March–April 2015, Vol. 54, No. 2. Pp. 199–215
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
DOI:10.1002/hrm.21654
Correspondence to: Rory Donnelly, Birmingham Business School, The University of Birmingham,
UniversityHouseEdgbaston Park Road, Birmingham B15 2TY, United Kingdom, Phone: +44 (0)121 414 5144,
E-mail:r.donnelly@bham.ac.uk.
Such practices often include the creation of mi-
nority interest groups and the provision of career
progression support specifically for workers from
these groups (Cooke & Saini, 2010).
This US-initiated agenda has gained interna-
tional currency among HR managers and orga-
nizational leaders, including those operating in
emerging economies (Healy & Oikelome, 2007;
Li, Wai Lung Chu, Lam, & Liao, 2011; Sippola
& Smale, 2007). India is a key exemplar among
these economies (Stumpf, Doh, & Tymon, 2010).
It is an extremely heterogeneous nation by eth-
nicity, language, and faith. Yet the legal and orga-
nizational infrastructure for diversity in India
is patchy and limited. Equal opportunities and
Introduction
Diversity and inclusion have become
prominent organizational and societal
concerns due to increasing market,
firm, and workforce internationaliza-
tion as well as legal, social, and eco-
nomic changes (Shen, Chanda, D’Netto, &
Monga, 2009). In this article, diversity and inclu-
sion (D&I) management refers to voluntary or-
ganizational interventions designed to recognize
and accommodate workers’ demographic and
personal differences into formal and informal
organizational structures through deliberate mea-
sures and policies, with the aim of maximizing
the contribution of staff to organizational goals.
TENSIONS AND CHALLENGES IN
THE MANAGEMENT OF DIVERSITY
AND INCLUSION IN IT SERVICES
MULTINATIONALS IN INDIA
RORY DONNELLY
Information technology (IT) services multinationals in India provide rich
environments for the analysis of emerging patterns of diversity and inclusion
management. Growing interest in this fi eld of management has been accentuated
by claims tabled by the business case and resource-based rationales. However,
challenges and tensions potentially undermine not only the viability of these
assertions, but also the impact of diversity and inclusion interventions them-
selves. This article investigates the tensions and challenges faced by a sample of
rms in India in relation to age, gender, and intra- and international diversity. The
ndings shed light on the implications of these tensions for HR management in
these organizations, which need to be addressed if the claims put forward by the
business- and resource-based perspectives are to be realized and the manage-
ment of diversity and inclusion is to be successfully aligned with business and
HR strategies. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: diversity, inclusion, India, business case, resource-based view
200 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, MARCH–APRIL 2015
Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm
India’s rapidly
expanding IT
services sector
features extensive
multinational
knowledge-intensive
activity, where
the application
and impact of D&I
initiatives is likely
to be salient, and
so it provides a
rich context for the
analysis of emerging
management
patterns.
The findings reveal tensions between the rhet-
oric of HRM theories and organizational policies,
management practice, and employee behavior in
the sample firms. Moreover, they cast light on the
implications of these tensions for HR management
in these organizations, which need to be addressed
if the claims advanced by the business-case and
resource-based perspectives are to be realized
and the management of D&I is to be successfully
aligned with their business and HR strategies.
The D&I Agenda: The Promise of Business
and Performance Enhancements
Diversity management is a relatively nebulous
functional construct, punctuated by contrasting
interpretations and continuing debate (Foster
& Harris, 2005; Oswick, 2010). This is because
it effectively constitutes a blanket term for the
management of a growing list of intersecting
individual differences, which vary with respect
to the degree to which they are directly visible.
Depending on national and organizational con-
text, these include but are not limited to age,
gender, ethnicity, disability, religion, social and
marital status, sexual orientation, personality,
and culture (Shen etal., 2009).
Diversity management builds on the social
categories covered by conventional equal opportu-
nities policies to include personal characteristics,
with the emphasis placed on positive voluntary
action rather than compliance with external leg-
islation (Jayne & Dipboye, 2004; Kossek, Lobel, &
Brown, 2005). Valuing, harnessing, and utilizing
demographic diversity and overcoming negative
discrimination and segregation are the commonly
espoused aims and ambitions of diversity advo-
cates and related policy statements (Healy, Kirton,
& Noon, 2010).
For some, this equates to a bifurcation with
the more traditional framework of equal oppor-
tunities, evidenced through the identification
of a range of distinguishing features (see, e.g.,
Kandola & Fullerton, 1998; Liff, 1997). However,
the degree to which these constitute practical or
analytical contours is subject to ongoing debate,
as is the extent to which there is evidence of any
real shift (Kaler, 2001). At firm level, this can be
particularly apparent due to overlaps in practice
and a tendency for the moniker of diversity man-
agement to be merely superimposed on to equal
opportunities policies, thereby obfuscating dif-
ferentiation on the behalf of HR practitioners and
organizational members (Foster & Harris, 2005;
Oswick, 2010).
Nevertheless, analyses of HRM discourse and
policy developments show that diversity manage-
ment continues to eclipse equal opportunities in
antidiscrimination legislation are components
of the Constitution and laws to protect the civil
rights of vulnerable groups, but they are not fully
comprehensive and are weakly enforced (Woodard
& Saini, 2006). Indeed, in an internationally com-
parative index of diversity readiness compiled by
the Society for Human Resource Management
(SHRM) and the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU)
(2009), India ranked 41 out of 47 countries.
Such national-level assessments may in part
be influenced by the scarcity of empirical research
examining the management of D&I in firms in
India (Budhwar & Varma, 2010). Consequently,
it is important that we address this lacuna by
enhancing our understanding of
D&I in this environment (Greene &
Kirton, 2010; Hoque & Noon, 2004;
Kamenou, 2007; Nishii & Özbilgin,
2007). India’s rapidly expanding
information technology (IT) services
sector features extensive multina-
tional knowledge-intensive activity,
where the application and impact of
D&I initiatives is likely to be salient,
and so it provides a rich context
for the analysis of emerging man-
agement patterns (see Ali, Kulik, &
Metz, 2011; Cooke & Saini, 2010).
The research detailed in this
article provides insight into the
management of D&I from the per-
spective of senior organizational
leaders in IT services multination-
als in India because of the pivotal
role of these actors and organiza-
tions in shaping policy and practice,
not only within but also outside
their firms. Through this prism, the
article focuses on the relationship
between organizational D&I policies
influenced by HRM theory and busi-
ness case arguments and the views
and actions of management and
staff, as accounted for by the sample.
In particular, the following research questions
are explored. How are age, gender, and intra- and
international diversity viewed and managed by
HR leaders in multinational IT services firms in
India? What challenges do they face in achiev-
ing their goals in relation to the management of
D&I policy and practice in these areas and why?
To address these questions, original data were col-
lected through qualitative semistructured inter-
views with top-level D&I agents in multinational
IT services firms in the high-tech clusters of Delhi
as well as the industry body, together with the
acquisition of organizational policy documents.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT