Take Me Out to the Ballgame, but Keep Me Away from the Concession Stand Workers: A Hypothetical Case Involving Negligent Volunteers at Ballparks

Date01 July 2016
AuthorKenneth M. York,Jennifer Cordon Thor
Published date01 July 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jlse.12049
Journal of Legal Studies Education
Volume 33, Issue 2, 293–316, Summer 2016
Take Me Out to the Ballgame, but
Keep Me Away from the Concession
Stand Workers: A Hypothetical Case
Involving Negligent Volunteers
at Ballparks
Jennifer Cordon Thorand Kenneth M. York∗∗
I. INTRODUCTION
Many of us enjoy attending major sporting events like professional baseball
and football games. We may even partake in the concession stand offerings
from time to time. Did you know that when you purchase an item from that
concession stand, the person working at the stand may not be employed by
the stadium? It is very likely that the person selling you a soda from behind
that stand is in fact a volunteer. This volunteer is donating her time to work at
that concession stand so that a nonprofit organization will receive a donation
from the stadium. What if that volunteer was negligent in the performance
of selling you that soda in a manner that caused you injury? Who is liable for
that injury? The hypothetical case that follows challenges students in a legal
environment of business course to answer that question by examining key
legal concepts in agency and contract law, and to conduct an ethical analysis
in a case involving volunteers.
Although the events in the following case are hypothetical,1the con-
tract that the students evaluate is a portion of an actual contract used by a
J.D., Assistant Professor of Management, School of Business Administration, Oakland Univer-
sity, Rochester, Michigan.
∗∗Ph.D., Professor of Management, School of Business Administration, Oakland University,
Rochester, Michigan.
1Many scholars have effectively used hypothetical case studies to demonstrate key legal
and ethical concepts. See, e.g., Robert J. Landry, III, Ethical Considerations in Filing Personal
Bankruptcy: A Hypothetical Case Study, 29. J. LEGAL STUD.EDUC. 59 (2012); Robert C. Bird, et al.,
C2016 The Authors
Journal of Legal Studies Education C2016 Academy of Legal Studies in Business
293
294 Vol. 33 / The Journal of Legal Studies Education
company called Delaware North Companies SPORTSERVICE (hereinafter
DNC), which provides concession services to Miller Park in Milwaukee,
Wisconsin.2Part II of this article discusses the various areas of law and ethics
that govern this volunteer arrangement, including an overview of the volun-
teer contract. In Part III, the hypothetical factual scenario is presented, and
is followed by discussion questions with teaching notes. The article concludes
in Part IV with the authors’ observations after using this hypothetical case in
a legal environment of business course.
II. APPLICABLE LAW AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Prior to using this hypothetical case, students should have a general under-
standing of some ethical theories and ethical decision-making models, as well
as an introduction to contract law and agency law. This hypothetical case is
best used after those topics have been covered in class. The instructor may
also want the students to conduct research into their own state’s treatment
of volunteer liability prior to or while participating in the case discussion.
A. Agency Law/Respondeat Superior
The law of agency governs many of our relationships in the business world.
Whether one is an employer or employee,3that relationship is oftentimes
governed by agency law. “Agency is the fiduciary relationship that arises when
one person (a principal) manifests assent to another person (an agent) that
the agent shall act on the principal’s behalf and subject to the principal’s
TroubledTimes at Upturn Records: Getting Traditional Legal Concepts to Dance to the New Online Beat,22
J. LEGAL STUD.EDUC. 1 (2004).
22013 Non-Profit Group Contract and Handbook for Miller Park,DEL.NORTH COMPANIES SPORTSER-
VICE, http://mlb.mlb.com/mil/downloads/y2013/BIC_2013Non-ProfitFundraising.pdf (last
visited Jan. 14, 2014) [hereinafter 2013 Non-Profit Group Contract]. A redacted copy of this docu-
ment is found in Appendix A.
3Sometimes individuals may be called independent contractors instead of employees. If a person
is an independent contractor, that person’s employer is generally not liable for torts committed
by the independent contractor during the course of employment. Courts look at the level of
control the employer has over the work being performed. If the employer has a lot of control
(supervision, provides the means/tools to perform the task), then that individual performing
the work will be considered an employee. If the employer has little control over how the work is
performed, that individual performing the work will be considered an independent contractor.
Graham v. James, 144 F.3d 229, 235 (2d Cir. 1998).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT