Summary judgment
Author | Aaron B. Maduff |
Pages | 253-260 |
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
9-1 LITIGATING SEXUAL HARASSMENT & SEX DISCRIMINATION CASES §9.1
CHAPTER 9: SUMMARY JUDGMENT
§9.1 TASK: OPPOSE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
§9.1.1 WHAT AND WHY
§9.1.1.1 Legal Standard
See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc
Celotex Corp. v. CatrettMatsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp.,
Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.
-
Harlston v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
See
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc
Roberts and Chavarria v. Swift and Company
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc
Hindman v. Transkrit Corp.
Crawford v. Runyon
Hillebrand v. M-Tron Indus., Inc.
Breeding v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.quoting Lynn v.
Deaconess Med. Ctr. – W. Campus
Harris v. Interstate Brands
Corporation
To continue reading
Request your trial